Apr 3·1 replyremember when forbes pulled mental gymnastics to nitpick kanye's billionaire status? guess the payroll hit so they're not sitting behind their screens making up excuses as to why certain numbers dont count and they're assuming she reaps in 100% of gross
- Apr 3
white supremacy at its highest no cap
- Apr 3chachi tea
remember when forbes pulled mental gymnastics to nitpick kanye's billionaire status? guess the payroll hit so they're not sitting behind their screens making up excuses as to why certain numbers dont count and they're assuming she reaps in 100% of gross
Is that really what they’re assuming?
OPApr 3·1 replyDYNAMIC UNO 2wordsBut
What the tour grossed is not the same as what she earned from the tour
Are you saying she earned a billion from the tour alone?
Are you saying the billion evaluation is only based on that one tour and that one film?
No
Her net worth was around $700 million last year, according to Forbes.
She made around $190 million after taxes from her tour and $250 million after taxes from the film. So she added $440 million to her net worth last year.
$700 million + $440 million is around $1.14 billion.
That's how they got the billion dollar number from the article I posted.
- Apr 3
cap for their yt saviour story
we know the drill - Apr 3·1 replySilas
No
Her net worth was around $700 million last year, according to Forbes.
She made around $190 million after taxes from her tour and $250 million after taxes from the film. So she added $440 million to her net worth last year.
$700 million + $440 million is around $1.14 billion.
That's how they got the billion dollar number from the article I posted.
And that original 700 million didn’t include anything other than music and performances? None of the endorsements? Or perhaps this?
amazon.com/WONDERSTRUCK-EDP-3-4-OZ-SP/dp/B005LN670S
350 dollar perfume currently selling
With multiple other products on the line as well like creams
We acting like this don’t exist?
You made it clear you look down upon Rihanna and jay z for selling other products. I wonder what the difference is, and why you view it more negatively for them
Apr 3LisaYea because concert merch is the same as Rihanna starting fenty beauty to become a billionaire, Jay z starting clothing, liquor, clubs, streaming, etc to become a billionaire, Kanye starting Yeezy brand with Gap, etc
You sound more racist by purposefully being obtuse and not acknowledging her accomplishment
whatever bro stop cheating on your wife
Apr 3
my goat has ktt2 in shambles again
Apr 3·1 replyDYNAMIC UNO 2wordsAnd that original 700 million didn’t include anything other than music and performances? None of the endorsements? Or perhaps this?
https://www.amazon.com/WONDERSTRUCK-EDP-3-4-OZ-SP/dp/B005LN670S
350 dollar perfume currently selling
With multiple other products on the line as well like creams
We acting like this don’t exist?
You made it clear you look down upon Rihanna and jay z for selling other products. I wonder what the difference is, and why you view it more negatively for them
The article is saying that shes the only person whos had her fortune pushed into billionaire status by revenue from music/touring. Not that her fortune is solely made up of revenue from music/touring.
Apr 3
Pinheadbut she must have exploited people if she’s a billionaire
can’t be true
Only ppl she exploited was her fanbase
- Apr 3
forbes is just TMZ with more words
Apr 3
Bobby_96Since numbers equals quality, she's objectively the GOAT.
crine
- Apr 3·1 replyglockglockglock
The article is saying that shes the only person whos had her fortune pushed into billionaire status by revenue from music/touring. Not that her fortune is solely made up of revenue from music/touring.
Well OP said otherwise
- Apr 3
T SWIZZLE
- Apr 3DYNAMIC UNO 2words
Well OP said otherwise
they just broke it down for you on this same page lol