I made the statement that, "There was no such thing as zero." He looked at me with a puzzled look upon his face for a moment and then the professor said, "Lets say you had an apple and I had an apple and you gave me your apple." "How many apples do you have?" I said, "I have two apples." He said, "You don't understand, you gave me your apple." I said, "No, you don't understand.
Man wrote a whole book on this
https://tcotlc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/OTOET_PREVIEW_055_SEPTEMBER_29_2020.pdf
If
4/2 is the inverse operation of 2 x 2 = 4
Then
it would naturally follow that
2/1 is the inverse operation of 1 x 1 = 2
he onto something
Even beyonce agrees with jim
Hydrogen technology has existed for while now
1 x 1 = 2
If
4/2 is the inverse operation of 2 x 2 = 4
Then
it would naturally follow that
2/1 is the inverse operation of 1 x 1 = 2
he onto something
2 is a prime number. that's literally the reason he's wrong. EDIT: the fundamental theory of arithmetic is a more in depth explanation.
2 is a prime number. that's literally the reason he's wrong. EDIT: the fundamental theory of arithmetic is a more in depth explanation.
ok nerd