op worried about missing cornucopia in fruit of loom logo when he should be worrying bout getting himself a cornucopia of b****es

Weird flex but ok

The great medieval Arabic philosopher, Avicenna, wrote that God does not see time as we do; i.e. for him there is no past nor present nor future. Now, supposing Avicenna is correct, let us imagine a situation in which God, from whatever vantage point he exists at, decides to intervene into our space-time world; i.e. break through from his timeless realm into human history. But if there is only omnipresent reality from his viewpoint, then he can as easily break through into what for us is the past as he can break through into what for us is the present or future. It is exactly like a chess player gazing down at the chessboard; he can move any of his pieces that he wishes. Following Avicenna’s reasoning, we can say that God, in desiring, for example, to bring about the Second Advent, need not limit the event to our present or future; he can breach our past — in other words, change our past history; he can cause it to have happened already. And this would be true for any change he wished to make, large or small. For instance, suppose an event in our year A.D. 2021 does not meet with God’s idea of how it all should go. He can obliterate it or tinker with it, improve it, whatever he wishes, even at a prior point in linear time. This is his advantage.

I submit to you that such alterations, the creation or selection of such so-called “alternate presents,” is continually taking place. The very fact that we can conceptually deal with this notion — that is, entertain it as an idea — is a first step in discerning such processes themselves. But I doubt if we will ever be able in any real fashion to demonstrate, to scientifically prove, that such lateral change processes do occur. Probably all we would have to go on would be vestiges of memory, fleeting impressions, dreams, nebulous intuitions that somehow things had been different in some way — and not long ago but now. We might reflexively reach for a light switch in the bathroom only to discover that it was — always had been — in another place entirely. We might reach for the air vent in our car where there was no air vent — a reflex left over from a previous present, still active at a subcortical level. We might dream of people and places we had never seen as vividly as if we had seen them, actually known them. But we would not know what to make of this, assuming we took time to ponder it at all. One very pronounced impression would probably occur to us, to many of us, again and again, and always without explanation: the acute, absolute sensation that we had done once before what we were just about to do now, that we so to speak lived a particular moment or situation previously — but in what sense could it be called “previously,” since only the present, not the past, was evidently involved? We would have the overwhelming impression that we were reliving the present, perhaps in precisely the same way, hearing the same words, saying the same words… I submit that these impressions are valid and significant, and I will even say this: Such an impression is a clue that at some past time point a variable was changed — reprogrammed, as it were — and that, because of this, an alternate world branched off, became actualized instead of the prior one, and that in fact, in literal fact, we are once more living this particular segment of linear time. A breaching, a tinkering, a change had been made, but not in our present — had been made in our past.

This is the only one of these that's actually interesting, EVERYONE, even people parodying the logo, remember it having a cornucopia

Taking this and extrapolating that it's proof of timeline changes or alternate dimensions is crazy though, it's interesting that we collectively all thought it had one, there's probably something that can be learned from it

correct, it goes very deep

Our brains hate disorder. Familiarity above all else.

Google who OP's uncle is

The thing that gets me is if you ask people how they learned what a cornucopia was, a lot will say that they found out BECAUSE of the FotL logo, it's not a familiar object

Again tho, I don't think there's any supernatural significance to this or whatever

Shut up

Lmao the logo was always the one on the right

We assigned a cornucopia to the logo because we associate pictures of fruits with a cornucopia, thus we thought so strongly the logo should have a cornucopia and we tricked ourselves

The Mandela Effect is real but it’s a result of us stubbornly sticking to what we think shouldve been there

That and the spelling of chic-fil-a

:pog:

Bernstein Bears

Wouldn't someone have a picture of it with the cornucopia

I could've swore it had one tho

It is currently fruit shaped

ya it’s the one on the left

mandela effect

You’re from universe 90S too? Greetings

Pics

This pic was taken on Jan 12 21

im buying a box pronto

Thread reeks of a buzzfeed article

buzzfeed.com/christopherhudspeth/examples-mandela-effect-parallel-universe-alternate-reality