also mao already had your ideas about the underclass without all of the twisting of marxism and weirdo class reducitionist s*** i dont know why you even wasted your fingers on the keyboard when you obviously dont know anything
@Synopsis dont think we forgot this
synop has a job and a college degree yall just try and paint him as one of these 17 year old instagram activist wannabe s***s and
ya aint een seen his bookshelf
I have a job and I dont pay rent.
You get a job
I have one but it's spreading me thin while being in school too
I have one but it's spreading me thin while being in school too
crine
19 days rent is due
https://voca.ro/1fuVmW4J8BYL
@Synopsis dont think we forgot this
takes me back
https://voca.ro/19UU7bBkIz3d
I think anger is just the primary means of communication we have on KTT. I agree with your points.
Just saying, read Mao, he talks about the peasant revolution. Read settlers, talks about how the colonized proletariat is the true revolutionary force, not the "white college educated proletariat" like you speak about.
Just know that the working class in the western world is different than the working class in the colonized world. Without that your ideas fall apart, obviously.
I don't subscribe to the belief that there needs to be a violent revolution. People don't live forever, instill good values in and educate the youth
I think anger is just the primary means of communication we have on KTT. I agree with your points.
Just saying, read Mao, he talks about the peasant revolution. Read settlers, talks about how the colonized proletariat is the true revolutionary force, not the "white college educated proletariat" like you speak about.
Just know that the working class in the western world is different than the working class in the colonized world. Without that your ideas fall apart, obviously.
I know. I like Mao's theory. You are condescendingly coming in treating me like an idiot.
But we are living in different times. The working class now have experienced a level of social mobility and are becoming soft. They are getting too comfortable within this system. The underclass are not comfortable and they are the ones prepared to fight.
I hate the phrase, ''No ethical consumption under capitalism'' That is the type of thing I am talking about. People need to stop the groupthink. The same communists are all following each other and sharing the exact same ideas and methods. Anyone different is excluded for thoughtcrimes.
synop has a job and a college degree yall just try and paint him as one of these 17 year old instagram activist wannabe s***s and
ya aint een seen his bookshelf
Having a job and a degree means he is more invested in capitalism than me. I have nothing to lose. Synopsis does.
Start asking questions of the more privileged who act militant. Are they prepared to lose it all? Because the state will take it from them.
Embrace unemployed, homeless communists. They are the ones you need. The state can take nothing from them.
Shaming a communist for being unemployed or not having a degree is laughable. That is capitalist propaganda. Literally.
True, only the most useless surplus lumpen scum, cast out of society, have any potential. Everything else has been compromised.
Having a job and a degree means he is more invested in capitalism than me. I have nothing to lose. Synopsis does.
Start asking questions of the more privileged who act militant. Are they prepared to lose it all? Because the state will take it from them.
i know what you’re talking about
s*** doesn’t always happen the way it’s predicted to
Embrace unemployed, homeless communists. They are the ones you need. The state can take nothing from them.
Shaming a communist for being unemployed or not having a degree is laughable. That is capitalist propaganda. Literally.
and also i didn’t mean for my post to be shaming anyone who didn’t have a degree or a job
btw
and also i didn’t mean for my post to be shaming anyone who didn’t have a degree or a job
btw
Yeah, I don't think that.
I just think more needs to be asked of the more privileged within communism. You don't nee to ask somebody who has nothing whether they are dedicated or not because we all know they are. Why would somebody with nothing not be invested in gaining something?
When somebody builds within capitalism, they are building something for the state to take away. If somebody woks hard for it, you have to start asking whether they are prepared for that. You have to wonder if they are conditioned for it.
This isn't often asked because people do not want to answer these questions. Answering them requires a high level of self responsibility.
The f*** you doing?
You said communists are the outcasts? It's me being an outcast.