Probably the Beatles but Mick had a cold ass response when he was asked lol "Our band is lucky to still be playing stadiums while The Beatles don't exist"
Probably the Beatles but Mick had a cold ass response when he was asked lol "Our band is lucky to still be playing stadiums while The Beatles don't exist"
Damn
Probably the Beatles but Mick had a cold ass response when he was asked lol "Our band is lucky to still be playing stadiums while The Beatles don't exist"
That is a cold ass response although the Beatles hated touring
It’s wild to think they never performed any of their good s*** ever, except once on some f***ing rooftop as a free performance
i've listened to the stones more and have more fav songs from them than the beatles tbh
Beatles wins in a hit battle
but Rolling Stones had more interesting songs imo
idk man. the stones had hits from the 60's - 80's. the beatles were only pumping them out for one decade
Facts is the kinks >>>
in a hits battle, they would get washed by the beach boys
idk man. the stones had hits from the 60's - 80's. the beatles were only pumping them out for one decade
Beatles hits are much wider known so in a 20 v 20, Beatles will take that.
preference wise I find the Rolling Stones to be more unique.
it's like MJ vs. Prince imo. Mj hit wise but preference I take Prince.
in a hits battle, they would get washed by the beach boys
I was more referring that the kinks were best British band from 60s tbh
But facts though BB’s were overall best from 60s Brian Wilson is f***en mastermind