subjectively

Nope someone thinking the other way around can be just as valid

Hell I can say Migos are better than Pink Floyd and it's just as a valid opinion

There are certain measures that can be objective.

If OP’s intention is to get KTT to stop using stupid and empty terms, he’s out of luck

False.

Nas is objectively a better MC than the Migos for example.

Some things in life are just facts, not opinions.

I agree with this. there's loudness...etc. danceability.

you can use objective aspects to observe technicalities in music, but how you measure it & how much weight you put on it is completely subjective.

So how would you measure that "objectively"

Bro do you not understand words

I’m just playing Devils Advocate ITT but truth is it really is subjective

taste is very subconscious

I think he means more in a general sense, like saying that "Drake makes 'objectively better' music than Jay-Z" in the way of personal taste in music and not a specific skill or attribute like lyricism.

Why does someone need to play devil’s advocate for a simple truth this site is crazy man

In for a potential hit thread

Lol its fun relax

you only say that bc you put extra weight on certain aspects of being an MC when you judge more than other aspects

ktt2 really making new classics im so proud of us for evolving

JIK is objectively better than LR

He’s not objectively better. His approach to rapping is more complex and lyrical than the Migos but that still doesn’t make him objectively better

when you think about it the internet has really made us all act so different socially man wtf

So if there’s no objectively better music then should musical debates even exist

I mean it’s a music forum at the end of the day we just like talking bout music

Obviously, but “better”—literally the only word OP is taking issue with—is not

Being better is not, being more enjoyable is