NeonNigga23 ♻️Feb 23, 2022
cold mountainlike what the f***?
nigga better go check out Armani Caesar or some Rapsody
dumbass nigga
all three are fye
- Feb 23, 2022
Surprised the case hasn’t gotten thrown out yet. Too many conflicting stories and everyone seemed to be drunk
- Feb 23, 2022·1 reply
There’s no way Ak has a manager
Feb 23, 2022·1 reply
Juninho CLBBig ak
https://twitter.com/akademiks/status/1496600812197396480
Y’all should peep the replies to this tweet
- Feb 23, 2022·1 replytexasbrisket
There’s no way Ak has a manager
he does
- Feb 23, 2022
nancy getting it too lol
- Feb 23, 2022
NANCY PELOSIIIIIIII 😂😂😂😂
Feb 23, 2022someone is giving ak the inside scoop?
Feb 23, 2022Ak pretty annoying
- Feb 23, 2022·1 reply
Ak was two steps ahead of Meg man lmao
- Feb 23, 2022
Y0 Nancy....🤨... U OWE BIG AK AN APOLOGY TOO - Feb 23, 2022
I NEED A BIG MAC AND AN APOLOGY
- Feb 23, 2022Cam Skattebo Fan
Y’all should peep the replies to this tweet
THAT ASS IS BIGGER THAN MY WILL TO LIVE B**** DAMN
Feb 23, 2022·1 replyCam Skattebo FanI thought she said there was no mention of DNA at all 🤔🤔🤔
https://twitter.com/nancy__dillon/status/1496599157166936066ALL OF YALL need to apologize to Ak
- Feb 23, 2022Cam Skattebo Fan
I thought she said there was no mention of DNA at all 🤔🤔🤔
https://twitter.com/nancy__dillon/status/1496599157166936066I told you Ak is more reliable lmao
Feb 23, 2022·edited·4 repliesCam Skattebo FanI thought she said there was no mention of DNA at all 🤔🤔🤔
https://twitter.com/nancy__dillon/status/1496599157166936066Actually now that I see how it's worded, Ak is wrong here, isn't he?
She says "We are in the process of actually retaining an expert with respect to DNA", meaning there was nothing initially confirmed about the lack of DNA which Ak claims in this document.
Her prior tweet would be correct since DNA was never mentioned as a key piece, since an expert hasn't been involved that precisely handles DNA. Tory's attorney seeing things as favorable does not mean there's something certain here.
Unless I'm seeing this wrong?
Feb 23, 2022·1 replyLast time I was itt, it was at page 53
- Feb 23, 2022·1 replyHi Roller
he does
Only in title. No way his manager signs off on all this
- Feb 23, 2022texasbrisket
Only in title. No way his manager signs off on all this
oh nobody can tell BIG AK what to do
Feb 23, 2022Oblivion XLast time I was itt, it was at page 53
54 for me
f*** this s*** back to Donda 2 thread
orangetcovid 👌🏿Feb 23, 2022·1 replythe other reporter doubling down.
journalism is dead bro. Ak really washing these niggas and not even upholding their ethics
- Feb 23, 2022·1 replyNiggamortis· edited
Actually now that I see how it's worded, Ak is wrong here, isn't he?
She says "We are in the process of actually retaining an expert with respect to DNA", meaning there was nothing initially confirmed about the lack of DNA which Ak claims in this document.
Her prior tweet would be correct since DNA was never mentioned as a key piece, since an expert hasn't been involved that precisely handles DNA. Tory's attorney seeing things as favorable does not mean there's something certain here.
Unless I'm seeing this wrong?
This makes it seem like LAPD already did their own a***ysis, and they are hiring an independent expert to confirm the findings
- Feb 23, 2022Niggamortis
Actually now that I see how it's worded, Ak is wrong here, isn't he?
She says "We are in the process of actually retaining an expert with respect to DNA", meaning there was nothing initially confirmed about the lack of DNA which Ak claims in this document.
Her prior tweet would be correct since DNA was never mentioned as a key piece, since an expert hasn't been involved that precisely handles DNA. Tory's attorney seeing things as favorable does not mean there's something certain here.
Unless I'm seeing this wrong?
I took that as LAPD ran their own DNA test in regards to the gun, which was “favorable” to Tory, and now they’re waiting for a third party expert to do their own tests
- Feb 23, 2022MyBallsAndMyWord
This makes it seem like LAPD already did their own a***ysis, and they are hiring an independent expert to confirm the findings
Yup
- Feb 23, 2022Niggamortis
Actually now that I see how it's worded, Ak is wrong here, isn't he?
She says "We are in the process of actually retaining an expert with respect to DNA", meaning there was nothing initially confirmed about the lack of DNA which Ak claims in this document.
Her prior tweet would be correct since DNA was never mentioned as a key piece, since an expert hasn't been involved that precisely handles DNA. Tory's attorney seeing things as favorable does not mean there's something certain here.
Unless I'm seeing this wrong?
I feel like shorty gonna keep updating. Next report- oh evidence is inconclusive.
Remember she works for a huge publication, it takes longer for stuff to come out because they don’t want to waste being wrong. Ak can cut corners