Apr 24, 2024·3 replies
bigbeltsFor him using his likeness and image
Did you even read what you replied to?
If the record isn't sold commercially
You can't be sued for using someones likeness and image if it's not being used commercially. He's not selling the record so no money is being made.
Apr 24, 2024He putting this on twitter and having check mark next to his name. It’s already bad sign. I don’t get why people look over this.
Apr 24, 2024·3 repliesThey don’t give a f*** about Tupac and preserving his legacy. They just want money
- Apr 24, 2024
Big Drizzy
Apr 24, 2024
Oseyhas he actually dropped anything or is he just posting on social media
Push ups is on streaming
Taylor Made isn’t though
Apr 24, 2024SMALL GLOThey don’t give a f*** about Tupac and preserving his legacy. They just want money
- Apr 24, 2024
Big Scorp
Apr 24, 2024·1 replykg65Kendrick fanboys so ready to hand out an L over this because their savior is MIA
Tell that midget to drop and stop trying to use legal s*** as a W in rap beef when the mf who supposed to drop ain’t drop yet
Awwwwwww.
- Apr 24, 2024·1 replySolemnNature
Awwwwwww.
Your boy will respond soon I promise, then you can actually make a thread with some decent content
Apr 24, 2024·2 repliesWhyCantILogInHas there ever been a good artist estate. Mac’s maybe
mac estate released that trash ass circles so idk
Apr 24, 2024SMALL GLOThey don’t give a f*** about Tupac and preserving his legacy. They just want money
- Apr 24, 2024magnolias
Let’s all take a deep breath and think outside the realm of rap beef for a second, some of y’all are in way too deep
here comes mr know it all
- Apr 24, 2024PapiChampu
If the record isn't sold commercially what can the estate even sue for?
copyright idk
- Apr 24, 2024·1 replyPapiChampu
Did you even read what you replied to?
If the record isn't sold commercially
You can't be sued for using someones likeness and image if it's not being used commercially. He's not selling the record so no money is being made.
Just read the f***ing article man. They would be suing for reputation damage
- Apr 24, 2024·1 replyPapiChampu
Did you even read what you replied to?
If the record isn't sold commercially
You can't be sued for using someones likeness and image if it's not being used commercially. He's not selling the record so no money is being made.
You can absolutely still sue people over using your likeness for noncommercial purposes.
- Apr 24, 2024·1 replyrastafire
?
- Apr 24, 2024Block Muteson
You can absolutely still sue people over using your likeness for noncommercial purposes.
Dudes are f***ing stupid
- Apr 24, 2024PapiChampu
Did you even read what you replied to?
If the record isn't sold commercially
You can't be sued for using someones likeness and image if it's not being used commercially. He's not selling the record so no money is being made.
Maybe they could argue he using it for advertising his song
- Apr 24, 2024·2 repliesbigbelts
Just read the f***ing article man. They would be suing for reputation damage
Would only hold up in court if the audience actually confused it as really Tupac. Since everyone knows it’s not actually him there is no reputation damage
Purrp 🌚Apr 24, 2024splicemac estate released that trash ass circles so idk
Dumbass btw^^
Apr 24, 2024splicemac estate released that trash ass circles so idk
?
- Apr 24, 2024·1 replyrastafire
- Apr 24, 2024·1 replyWhyCantILogIn
Would only hold up in court if the audience actually confused it as really Tupac. Since everyone knows it’s not actually him there is no reputation damage
That degree from devry university coming in handy
- ATF 🩻Apr 24, 2024WhyCantILogIn
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/tupac-shakur-sister-lawsuit-executor-estate-embezzlement-1283272/amp/
Tupac’s estate is controlled by some white guy that won’t give his sister any money btw
ICEMAN40 🧤Apr 24, 2024
BIG lifeline
