Looks cute I like it
Tyler being edgy - that s*** sucks, forced gimmick, gotta grow up
Tyler changing up the sound/aesthetics for Flower Boy onwards - that s*** sucks, hipster bait, pandering etc
Tyler dropping IGOR - this s*** sucks, he don't even rap, voice sucks
Tyler dropping CMIYGL - this s*** sucks, pandering back for hiphop audience, pharrell biting, forced aesthetics
What do y'all even want from Tyler ffs lol
Anyone hating on Tyler after Cherry bomb is pathetic

![]()
news.artnet.com/art-world/please-enjoy-photos-damien-hirst-drake-bro-ing-sneakers-2011119
Idk how you ignored all the articles like these while searching for those images tbh
Looks like a dr. seuss universe
warhol as a "pop artist" himself isn't even better than a lichtenstein or haring, but comparing him to hirst is just
Fashion is an industry. Again, can these guys even sow or weave or dye or anything related to the actual production of the art.
They're all Steve Jobs bozos
Music is an industry, film is an industry... pretty much all art exists in a commercial context rn but that doesn't mean there isn't actual artistry involved.
there's no proof picasso ever said that
steve jobs stealing ass attributed that quote to picasso out of nowhere
It was Apple CEO Steve Jobs, however, who began attaching Picasso’s name to the aphorism in the 1980s
source
Whether or not Picasso said it doesnt take away from that universal fact that everyone is influenced by someone. No idea truly is original.
And there is evidence of that sentiment being said way before steve jobs got in the picture.
In 1920 the major poet T. S. Eliot published “The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism”, and he presented his own version of the maxim. Eliot interchanged the terminology used by Davenport by suggesting that: “to imitate” was shoddy, and “to steal” was praiseworthy. This change moved the expression closer to the modern incarnation employed by Steve Jobs:
One of the surest of tests is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different from that from which it was torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.
google.com/amp/s/quoteinvestigator.com/2013/03/06/artists-steal/amp
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/please-enjoy-photos-damien-hirst-drake-bro-ing-sneakers-2011119
Idk how you ignored all the articles like these while searching for those images tbh
I'm not reading some random blog so I really don't know what you're getting at.
I'm not reading some random blog so I really don't know what you're getting at.
good man
Tyler being edgy - that s*** sucks, forced gimmick, gotta grow up
Tyler changing up the sound/aesthetics for Flower Boy onwards - that s*** sucks, hipster bait, pandering etc
Tyler dropping IGOR - this s*** sucks, he don't even rap, voice sucks
Tyler dropping CMIYGL - this s*** sucks, pandering back for hiphop audience, pharrell biting, forced aesthetics
What do y'all even want from Tyler ffs lol
Niggas that hated on Flower Boy are just unanimously idiots tho. I thought that was a well known fact.
Whether or not Picasso said it doesnt take away from that universal fact that everyone is influenced by someone. No idea truly is original.
And there is evidence of that sentiment being said way before steve jobs got in the picture.
In 1920 the major poet T. S. Eliot published “The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism”, and he presented his own version of the maxim. Eliot interchanged the terminology used by Davenport by suggesting that: “to imitate” was shoddy, and “to steal” was praiseworthy. This change moved the expression closer to the modern incarnation employed by Steve Jobs:
One of the surest of tests is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different from that from which it was torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/quoteinvestigator.com/2013/03/06/artists-steal/amp/
Steve Jobs was a business man, a marketer, not an artist. Nor was he an engineer. Apple has turned into the EA Sports of tech and you get the same product with a roster update every year. Or they just cannibalize someone else's innovation and incorporate into their preexisting infrastructure. Not totally unlike rappers pretending their real passion was fashion cause they can pick out swatches.
Whether or not Picasso said it doesnt take away from that universal fact that everyone is influenced by someone. No idea truly is original.
And there is evidence of that sentiment being said way before steve jobs got in the picture.
In 1920 the major poet T. S. Eliot published “The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism”, and he presented his own version of the maxim. Eliot interchanged the terminology used by Davenport by suggesting that: “to imitate” was shoddy, and “to steal” was praiseworthy. This change moved the expression closer to the modern incarnation employed by Steve Jobs:
One of the surest of tests is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different from that from which it was torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/quoteinvestigator.com/2013/03/06/artists-steal/amp/
Nigga went to the literary critic archives i love to see it
Top one looks better
Bottom one is horrible
Yet they operate on the exact same artistic principles.
He’s just doing what he likes.
Igor was the only ‘miss’ and thats only cause yeah homie singing a lil hard on the ears.
Call me if ya get lost is a good album even if the concept imo is morally reprehensible (and this has nothing to do with wilshire thread, i just think niggas that make moves on a nigga in a relationship be just super scummy)
Nigga went to the literary critic archives i love to see it
Got into poetry as a kid
Igor was the only ‘miss’ and thats only cause yeah homie singing a lil hard on the ears.
Call me if ya get lost is a good album even if the concept imo is morally reprehensible (and this has nothing to do with wilshire thread, i just think niggas that make moves on a nigga in a relationship be just super scummy)
CMIYGL just ain’t memorable, it wasn’t bad it just wasn’t that good either
CMIYGL just ain’t memorable, it wasn’t bad it just wasn’t that good either
Nah joints like Massa go DUMB hard bro
Whether or not Picasso said it doesnt take away from that universal fact that everyone is influenced by someone. No idea truly is original.
And there is evidence of that sentiment being said way before steve jobs got in the picture.
In 1920 the major poet T. S. Eliot published “The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism”, and he presented his own version of the maxim. Eliot interchanged the terminology used by Davenport by suggesting that: “to imitate” was shoddy, and “to steal” was praiseworthy. This change moved the expression closer to the modern incarnation employed by Steve Jobs:
One of the surest of tests is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different from that from which it was torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/quoteinvestigator.com/2013/03/06/artists-steal/amp/
yeah that's also more what I think the quote is about
but people in general (not u) use it to justify plagiarism/theft with a
"well since picasso (a great artist) said it it must be true" mentality
I don't really care about intellectual property for the sake of making money of of creations, it's the lack of artistic integrity that bothers me when this "artists steal" narrative gets brought up
there's a differnce between copying, re-using, re-imaging older concepts without insulting your audience's intelligence and just "stealing" someone's art
ie: buying a song, changing one word in the chorus then claiming to have written the entire song by legally putting your name as the songwriter
The aesthetic looks like a fallout commercial
Just need to add vault boy into those pictures
Yet they operate on the exact same artistic principles.
The emoji cheapen the image. the cover reminds me of those karmaloop emoji sweatpants/hoodies they used to sell back in 2013-14. If it was something like this, it would look better.