If Kendrick was on tape groping a minor and had multiple instances of being a creep and he lost a battle to those accusations he would get just as clowned

It really isn't, but I understand why you won't try as I will destroy your weak excuse. Kind of easy to recognize the individuals who've been doing that consistently for 22 months. And the fact that I always see them whenever I decide to open a thread these days - which isn't often - says a lot.

All you had to say was yes or no lol. You’re incapable of hiding your bias.

Quote this in 2036

I literally said yes with examples, I never had a bias I enjoy both artists when the music is good

Metallica never stopped getting clowned

Anyone with half a brain knows they were right and everyone hated them for calling it out at the time.

oh my god he's still doing this f***ing lawsuit

Honestly it’s not hard to imagine anyone else suing for this. You can’t call someone a pedophile if they aren’t a pedophile and not expect to be served with a lawsuit. Doesn’t matter who you are or where you said it.

“All you had to say is yes or no. Why did you bring up the video of Drake groping a minor? Bias is clear as day.”

You guys are rotten

It’s not hard to imagine anything if you have a vivid imagination, but the reality is he sued after losing a rap battle, anybody is getting clowned for that, including Kendrick

No. I already said “if the roles were reversed.”

U know if he would have said f*** a lawsuit, "you won Kendrick "(on a IG post) and took a break for a full year after that s*** happened, He would actually already be back by now

The clowning is more than expected I’m just arguing the legal perspective.

And we literally reversed and added the context that shows why the pedophile label stuck, like it’s been said before this isn’t something Kendrick made up just for the battle

Nah that would’ve been worse imo.

If I was the judge id entertain it, but drake gotta show up in person and defend the case himself

Why reverse the roles when Kendrick lacks the questionable history with minors that Drake carries with him? Are we reversing that onto Kendrick too?

Why simplify it as if Kendrick called Drake a pedophile for no reason? Why do Drake fans choose to be dense about this?

Even groomer would’ve been a stretch. Pedophile is beyond. Drake has a solid case.

Need that

Drake’s questionable history with minors is a moment on stage and a friendship with a minor, correct?

if someone calls you a pedophile and it’s not true you punch them in the mouth, particularly if it’s in a rap song

should be no problem for Drizzy Corelone, if we believe what he says in the music he’s getting people touched up every other day for way less

It’s a rap battle, it’s suppose to be exaggerated and a stretch

If one day Kendrick just had a press conference calling Drake a pedophile while no battle was being had, that’s a different situation, but in the context of the battle, there’s no case, as the judge said the first time