Jun 2, 2025
PALESTINE DATTENThe entire site is posting itt
Preach
HBDUSA 🇺🇸Jun 2, 2025·1 reply
AvenueJonesAre you actually that fat?
The avi removed 100 lbs
Jun 2, 2025
orangetcovidumg stans
https://twitter.com/OVODocket/status/1929558336833511527
rebuttal?So now it’s real and not promo?
Jun 2, 2025·1 replyAvenueJones· editedDid you read it? And by read I mean actually scroll top to bottom not just search Drake and read from there
Jun 2, 2025
bmassfatter
i like my boys bbw
the type to suck you dry and then eat some lunch with you
Jun 2, 2025·4 repliesfeels like multiple things can be true here. labels were censoring and dropping artists prior to that lawsuit, lets be real. now at the same time, Drake’s lawsuit will make labels, particularly UMG, be hypersensitive to pretty much anything whenever they feel like it could blow up in their face
the discussion of the lawsuit will never be genuine. anyone that isnt bias, can acknowledge its lame. but i also get trying to defend your name/brand/business. not defending it, just saying i understand
all in all, looking forward to hearing why they wanted to censor this verse because its gotta be something more controversial and bigger than the Drake s***
- Jun 2, 2025·1 reply
Lil Uzi HorizontalWhite glove service with the bricks I am Luigi
more like
Jun 2, 2025orangetcovidumg stans
https://twitter.com/OVODocket/status/1929558336833511527
rebuttal?Anyone who sincerely starts a post online with ‘so just like drakes attorney stated’ should have their electric devices seized and be sentenced to community service
Jun 2, 2025·1 reply
DreamerDamn so it’s not true. My fault SZA tour doin decent I guess
they gone top out at $430M
2nd highest grossing black tour of all time on the way
- Jun 2, 2025
They posting OVODocket again huh
- Jun 2, 2025ICEMAN KIR
more like
If you don't come with my money I pop out of the bushes with a silencer
Jun 2, 2025John MaddenHoldee onnnnn
- Jun 2, 2025·1 replyNoFace
feels like multiple things can be true here. labels were censoring and dropping artists prior to that lawsuit, lets be real. now at the same time, Drake’s lawsuit will make labels, particularly UMG, be hypersensitive to pretty much anything whenever they feel like it could blow up in their face
the discussion of the lawsuit will never be genuine. anyone that isnt bias, can acknowledge its lame. but i also get trying to defend your name/brand/business. not defending it, just saying i understand
all in all, looking forward to hearing why they wanted to censor this verse because its gotta be something more controversial and bigger than the Drake s***
Especially for a song that doesn't even diss Drake
- Jun 2, 2025bmass
fatter
Forgot to log into your other account and respond guy
Jun 2, 2025·edited·1 replyorangetcovidumg stans
https://twitter.com/OVODocket/status/1929558336833511527
rebuttal?Lol every single contract is different. Def Jam probably had some level of creative control over the Clipse album. The rumored are Kendrick has 100% creative control, it was rumored UMG didn't know GNX was dropping until it was time to drop lol
And the optics of Push and Kendrick collabing this close to the beef is definitely a thing UMG would keep an eye on lol
I also hate how Drake stans are championing that OVO docket page when it's just a Stan page pretending to understand contract law and legal precedent
ICEMAN40 🧤Jun 2, 2025·1 replyGoshBut they also play video games together it’s not just Drake sxn rejects!!!!
@Dreamer we playing tonight btw.
Jun 2, 2025NoFacefeels like multiple things can be true here. labels were censoring and dropping artists prior to that lawsuit, lets be real. now at the same time, Drake’s lawsuit will make labels, particularly UMG, be hypersensitive to pretty much anything whenever they feel like it could blow up in their face
the discussion of the lawsuit will never be genuine. anyone that isnt bias, can acknowledge its lame. but i also get trying to defend your name/brand/business. not defending it, just saying i understand
all in all, looking forward to hearing why they wanted to censor this verse because its gotta be something more controversial and bigger than the Drake s***
- Jun 2, 2025·1 replyJPEGMAFIA· edited
Lol every single contract is different. Def Jam probably had some level of creative control over the Clipse album. The rumored are Kendrick has 100% creative control, it was rumored UMG didn't know GNX was dropping until it was time to drop lol
And the optics of Push and Kendrick collabing this close to the beef is definitely a thing UMG would keep an eye on lol
I also hate how Drake stans are championing that OVO docket page when it's just a Stan page pretending to understand contract law and legal precedent
yeah bro for sure
- Jun 2, 2025Valentine
they gone top out at $430M
2nd highest grossing black tour of all time on the way
It’s clearly bc of the boy
The honorable thing is to gimmie da loot
- orangetcovid 👌🏿Jun 2, 2025·1 replyAvenueJones
Did you read it? And by read I mean actually scroll top to bottom not just search Drake and read from there
this ain't it🤣🤣
accept ur L
- Jun 2, 2025
real question tho
if they were willing to censor and drop bro
what does that mean for the lawsuit?
then again, it is just Pusha T
- Jun 2, 2025
also, labels make so much money off conflict, there’s no way in hell, regardless if Drake wins the lawsuit or not, will it prevent diss tracks or censorship of whats being said in diss tracks
- orangetcovid 👌🏿Jun 2, 2025AvenueJones
Are you actually that fat?
yes
what now - Jun 2, 2025ICEMAN40
@Dreamer we playing tonight btw.
Say less twin
- Jun 2, 2025·2 replies
Pover T lost!