Reply
  • May 17, 2020
    ·
    edited

    “In general, it is a disappointment, appalling really. There was better text that was rejected,” said Jamie Love, the director of the NGO Knowledge Ecology International. “The US, UK, Swiss and some others pushed against the WHO taking the lead in pushing for open licensing of patents and know-how for d**** and vaccines.

    “In a global crisis like this, that has such a massive impact on everyone, you would expect the WHO governing body to have the backbone to say no monopolies in this pandemic. It’s one thing for a country to use its economic clout to buy preferential access to d**** or vaccines. It’s another to prevent others from manufacturing and expanding global supply.

    theguardian.com/world/2020/may/17/us-and-uk-lead-push-against-global-patent-pool-for-covid-19-drugs

  • FREE 💜
    May 17, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Expecting the WHO to look out for people

  • May 17, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    FREE

    Expecting the WHO to look out for people

    All member states will vote soon on whether the vaccine should be open-source, but UK and US are refusing to corporate.

    We finna die die because trump and bojo are tryna advance the interests of the empire. smfh

  • May 17, 2020
    stingray

    All member states will vote soon on whether the vaccine should be open-source, but UK and US are refusing to corporate.

    We finna die die because trump and bojo are tryna advance the interests of the empire. smfh

    Its so sick

  • May 18, 2020

    Fauci was big into patenting vaccines/treatments for other diseases, so they got their team in place to make this happen