Reply
  • Jan 3, 2020

    In the name of communism..

  • Jan 3, 2020

    Bro America didn’t have the balls during a 15 year war to kill high profile taliban leaders Bc is the political backlash it would cause

    And then last night happens

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
  • Gojira 🦖
    Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    A secular Iran shall rise!

    Inshallah!

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    edited

    Zendebad Iran

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Idk bout no political s*** but Iranian broads>>>>>>>>>>white b****es

  • Jan 3, 2020
    Mike2210

    Idk bout no political s*** but Iranian broads>>>>>>>>>>white b****es

    Iranians are very good looking people

  • Jan 3, 2020
    Giannis

    Only fitting!

    http://rss.gcnlive.com/alexJones/

    the goat tbh

  • Gojira 🦖
    Jan 3, 2020
    hot pancakes

    Not claiming this is a fact because I don’t know enough about the situation, but just showing how there seems to be two sides to this from the Iranian perspective

    People wanna ignore this lmao, the regime is still f***ed and the people hate them too.

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Gojira

    A secular Iran shall rise!

    Inshallah!

    they had that before

    then us and the british staged a coup

  • Jan 3, 2020
  • Jan 3, 2020

    Keep seeing kids who did national guard a weekend a month post on Facebook about how they’re “ready to defend America” Lmaoo

  • Gojira 🦖
    Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Synopsis

    they had that before

    then us and the british staged a coup

    There’s a good portion of Iranians who will gladly let Trump f*** the regime up if it means the end of the Supreme Leader and ultimately theocracy itself.

    Obviously the smarter citizens would want the Iranian people to end it themselves, but they are desperate.

    Yes, Mossadegh was the best case scenario, and America f***ed themselves over in the long run for that. In the end though, the people of Iran still have to solve their regime problems themselves but there is a good amount who will let Trump intervene even if it means imperialism.

    They just don’t want the Supreme Leader anymore.

  • Jan 3, 2020
    Undecided
    https://twitter.com/rosemcgowan/status/1213101280278790150

    Weak response. Let the meatheads in our army die for lockheed martin's Q1 profits

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Gojira

    There’s a good portion of Iranians who will gladly let Trump f*** the regime up if it means the end of the Supreme Leader and ultimately theocracy itself.

    Obviously the smarter citizens would want the Iranian people to end it themselves, but they are desperate.

    Yes, Mossadegh was the best case scenario, and America f***ed themselves over in the long run for that. In the end though, the people of Iran still have to solve their regime problems themselves but there is a good amount who will let Trump intervene even if it means imperialism.

    They just don’t want the Supreme Leader anymore.

    It's not up to America to intervene on behalf of the Iranian people. We have no right to participate in regime change.

  • Gojira 🦖
    Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Synopsis

    It's not up to America to intervene on behalf of the Iranian people. We have no right to participate in regime change.

    Are you living in a nation where your free speech is severely limited, your leader instantly gets rid of any secular political figure or party, you are bound to a religion you may not even follow, your economy is s***, but it’s all in the name of the religion?

  • Jan 3, 2020
    Gojira

    Are you living in a nation where your free speech is severely limited, your leader instantly gets rid of any secular political figure or party, you are bound to a religion you may not even follow, your economy is s***, but it’s all in the name of the religion?

    Doesn't matter. It's still not up to America to go about changing regimes.

  • Jan 3, 2020
  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Gojira

    Are you living in a nation where your free speech is severely limited, your leader instantly gets rid of any secular political figure or party, you are bound to a religion you may not even follow, your economy is s***, but it’s all in the name of the religion?

    You can't publically criticize the troops or police in America, the top 1% own half the wealth of this country, we have theocrats in charge all over this country, particulary the hillbilly states. I could go on and on.

  • Jan 3, 2020
    Moody mann

    You can't publically criticize the troops or police in America, the top 1% own half the wealth of this country, we have theocrats in charge all over this country, particulary the hillbilly states. I could go on and on.

    It's also illegal to criticize Israel and boycott them in this country

  • Jan 3, 2020

    maybe if we hadn't already royally f***ed ourselves over in the region, we could bring about diplomatic negotiations that would encourage other areas to be more modern in their approach to human rights

    it would also help if we weren't hypocrites ourselves on the subject or the biggest violators of national sovereignty ever. Hard to preach to other countries about equality and human rights when we can't respect them ourselves.

  • Jan 3, 2020

    It's hillarious how they blame this general for killing US troops when they shouldn't have been in Iraq in the first place lmfao.

    Just a continuation of foreign policy blunders

  • Jan 3, 2020

    He didn’t create Hezbollah. Wtf 😂😂😂

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Woke up this morning to 22 likes, several of them on one of my longer posts explaining the complexity of the situation.
    This really put me in a more optimistic mood about ktt's reading abilities, thanks fam for actually reading through the stuff.
    Seems like we can still have some actual conversations on here, not just one-liners thrown against each other.

  • Jan 3, 2020

    LOL THE WAR IN YEMEN???? BRUH