theguardian.com/world/live/2020/jan/03/iran-general-qassem-suleimani-killed-us-trump-drone-strike-baghdad-reaction-live-updates

First off what yall niggas doing over there,

Second of all why the government stating the obvious like they care about you after shooting first and warning yall later.

Someone get me out this timeline

These are oilfield workers, NGOs personnels, Iraqi dusk citizens and the list goes on.

Lmao they say after the fact cuz they couldn’t say it before without causing some kind of suspicion. They was more worried bout killing that one guy than their own citizens out there

its crazy that america has the right to destroy innocent lives and start a war in another continent while their asses are safe in the white house

Innocent lives
Where is this right expressed anywhere? Are you equating hostility towards a militia backed by a foreign nation that was engaging in attacks against military personnel as "innocent lives"? Lmao ok my guy.

Should've done this immediately after the US Embassy was attacked

war destroys far more than some militias
you wouldnt know tho i bet its safe there in your suburb

right ? but let something happen in their country then the entire universe must get shut down

I never said that war wouldn't affect people. You claimed the US had a right to do so, and I'm questioning where you got that reasoning from. I also don't live in the US.

if there are no consequences for your actions it means you have rhe right to do so
why you change your standpoint now

No it doesn't. You can have the "right" to do something and still face consequences. What standpoint did I change?

first saying i was equating hostility towards a militia only
destroy a whole city and all its citizens will have it harder every day than you in your entire life

What city is being destroyed? Are you posting about something that can hypothetically occur or something that has already happened? If it's the former, discussing theories is pointless as it's only conjecture.

voanews.com/middle-east/iraqi-cities-ruins-after-little-cash-rebuild

could find many articles like that
point is its something america did before and might do again, this is just history repeating itself again and again

why’re you defending the US’ right to violating international laws ?

after the iraq war and the constant drone strikes that have killed innocents there is no leg the US could possibly stand on and anyone defending it is a warmongering animal

I'm not defending them, I'm questioning Sucuk's logic. Unless you can point directly to where I defended the US and it's decisions.

Also, what law has been violated? Unless you know exactly what you're talking about, I'd refrain from making blanket statements that sound correct in your head.

iraq invasion = illegal
drone strikes = illegal
assassinating officials of countries you’re not at war with = illegal

The fact that you have to explain this to some people like it ain't obvious

Isn't attacking an embassy and bombing a military base also illegal? What's the supposed consequence for either of these actions?

Lol, Iran didn't do neither. Iraqis destroyed the embassy and some backwoods militia shelled the base.

Yet the Iranian general is killed, how does this even remotely make sense?

It does really, trumps just wanted to put his agression on Iran because he couldn't kill Iraqis and the militia are obviously guerrillas.

So all that was left as Iran, even though it did nothing. He just wanted to strike SOMETHING, ANYTHING.

Which he did.

Imagine still being in Iraq after 2003

I was referring to the militia, who have been linked to Iran. I don't even know how they've been linked myself, I'm quoting several news outlets that claim there is one.