The wire has a lot more characters , has to build a world of Baltimore which many of us don’t know of the crime and cops . More characters talking . Each season covering a different aspect . What you guys are missing with the slow comments is THERE ARE LESS CHARACTERS TO ENGAGE WITH. We’ve seen laxmi 3 times diabatte 3 times Carol every episode manusos like 4 times and heavy this episode . The rest is the hive. Story just set in our world overall . There is less to take in .
With the main goal being cure the hive or feed the hive. Many of us know or feel it won’t be cured for multiple seasons or if it is cured they will be different . Questions of the alien signal , why they are immune or will a survivor choose to turn remain . There was the Native American woman who said she wanted to join them did she ?
Keeping the show so tight on Carol has its pros and cons because she is only so interesting
You hit the nail on the head.
When you look at most, if not all, of the most beloved shows of all time, what do they all have in common?
Ensemble casts. Characters bouncing off of each other & interacting heavily.
Pluribus is the complete inverse of this. 90% of the runtime is focused on one character. The majority of the other “characters” in the one single hive-mind, eventually reducing them all to one single character. And then there’s the other survivors, who we’ve seen basically for a total of one episode together, or isolated themselves in the case of Manousos.
That’s why I said that Pluribus’s “slow” is entirely different from BCS & BB’s “slow”. Those two shows still had ensemble casts to keep average viewers engaged in. Pluribus does not have that (yet).
The average person watches TV to fall in love with the characters. So far, there haven’t been many to fall in love with in Pluribus, and the main one is extremely miserable to the point of being unlikable for most people
I never said that this show is good because its "slow" (which isn't)
It’s definitely slow that’s not even arguable man
The wire has a lot more characters , has to build a world of Baltimore which many of us don’t know of the crime and cops . More characters talking . Each season covering a different aspect . What you guys are missing with the slow comments is THERE ARE LESS CHARACTERS TO ENGAGE WITH. We’ve seen laxmi 3 times diabatte 3 times Carol every episode manusos like 4 times and heavy this episode . The rest is the hive. Story just set in our world overall . There is less to take in .
With the main goal being cure the hive or feed the hive. Many of us know or feel it won’t be cured for multiple seasons or if it is cured they will be different . Questions of the alien signal , why they are immune or will a survivor choose to turn remain . There was the Native American woman who said she wanted to join them did she ?
Keeping the show so tight on Carol has its pros and cons because she is only so interesting
I was only comparing it to the wire in pacing terms, they literally the opposite in everything else what you even talking about
Just because Gilligan wants to make a minimalistic work doesn't make it better or worse than any other show with 200 characters
Usually when people describe a show as “slow” or “boring”, they mean that not much is happening besides people talking in rooms. Fair.
Pluribus doesn’t even have that
It’s mostly Carol doing something alone while barely speaking. That’s why I said this show’s slow is different from other shows’ slow
As I said you can watch the entire recent episode in 2x time speed and everything makes sense . This was a lingering slower episode that was redundant with no major unexpecteds. The hive told him he would touch a poisonous plant and he did . Carol was sad and lonely while still calling them .
I don’t grasp the point of there being 13 immune people when we don’t see the other’s perspectives at all or quickly
thx for confirming the "2x generation" theory lol
I’m not discounting anything, I’m just saying the types of slow starts both shows had aren’t the same imo.
You can’t point to numerous episodes of BCS where there were long stretches without any dialogue whatsoever
Sure, and amount of dialogue is not the only way to measure whether something is fast or slow paced. You're operating from a different value system than me. You raise the lack of dialogue, and I raise the stakes and mystery and comedy and emotion. All these things contribute to the pace as well.
You hit the nail on the head.
When you look at most, if not all, of the most beloved shows of all time, what do they all have in common?
Ensemble casts. Characters bouncing off of each other & interacting heavily.
Pluribus is the complete inverse of this. 90% of the runtime is focused on one character. The majority of the other “characters” in the one single hive-mind, eventually reducing them all to one single character. And then there’s the other survivors, who we’ve seen basically for a total of one episode together, or isolated themselves in the case of Manousos.
That’s why I said that Pluribus’s “slow” is entirely different from BCS & BB’s “slow”. Those two shows still had ensemble casts to keep average viewers engaged in. Pluribus does not have that (yet).
The average person watches TV to fall in love with the characters. So far, there haven’t been many to fall in love with in Pluribus, and the main one is extremely miserable to the point of being unlikable for most people
There is only so much I can care about a cure in a world I saw non infected for all of a hour of 7. Carol and Helen I feel bad for her loss but let’s say we ship her and zoisia them kissing or confessing their love for each other won’t do much for me . I was personally hooked by the possibility each of the immune would have their own thoughts and loved ones or reason they couldn’t resist hive. Seeing that would help me . I get the Carol focus but I can’t think of a show that has been this focused on so few characters . It is still magic that he makes it work this well
Sure, and amount of dialogue is not the only way to measure whether something is fast or slow paced. You're operating from a different value system than me. You raise the lack of dialogue, and I raise the stakes and mystery and comedy and emotion. All these things contribute to the pace as well.
What are the stakes ? Episode to episode you know 100% Carol will not be turned or die . She may eventually “ cure” this or aliens show up but what are the true stakes she has plot armor and he said he aims for 4 seasons
It’s definitely slow that’s not even arguable man
It is arguable. This is not objective. Art is a subjective experience.
thx for confirming the "2x generation" theory lol
I watched the episode twice you miss the point because out of paragraphs you can only respond to one sentence
It is arguable. This is not objective. Art is a subjective experience.
Words have meaning. If I said Pluribus was fast-paced that is objectively incorrect, there is nothing fast-paced about it
Sure, and amount of dialogue is not the only way to measure whether something is fast or slow paced. You're operating from a different value system than me. You raise the lack of dialogue, and I raise the stakes and mystery and comedy and emotion. All these things contribute to the pace as well.
But for the average person it is, nobody said anything about what you value. We’re talking about casual viewers’ mixed reception to this series so far.
The casual audience member wants dialogue in their films and shows, that is undeniably true
What are the stakes ? Episode to episode you know 100% Carol will not be turned or die . She may eventually “ cure” this or aliens show up but what are the true stakes she has plot armor and he said he aims for 4 seasons
The stakes are that our characters are trying to save the world. On top of that, the stakes are that our characters are trapped in a sociological experiment where they're suffering from loneliness on an extreme scale.
It is arguable. This is not objective. Art is a subjective experience.
I disagree. Slowness is an objective measurement, the personal observation of the slowness is what makes it subjective.
Jeanne Dielman (using an obvious example of something a lot of people call slow) IS absolutely slow, but it almost always finds itself in a rhythm that entrances or wonders.
But for the average person it is, nobody said anything about what you value. We’re talking about casual viewers’ mixed reception to this series so far.
The casual audience member wants dialogue in their films and shows, that is undeniably true
I couldn't give less of a f*** about what casual viewers want and thank god there's still artists out there that also don't give a f*** about what casual viewers want
I disagree. Slowness is an objective measurement, the personal observation of the slowness is what makes it subjective.
Jeanne Dielman (using an obvious example of something a lot of people call slow) IS absolutely slow, but it almost always finds itself in a rhythm that entrances or wonders.
I think you're right. I will correct: Where we draw the line for slowness is arguable. So, it's somewhere between Jeanne Dielman and Fast and Furious.
This thread is gonna be a hilarious s***show for years
You comparing this to the wire says everything lol
Copy pasting for my previous reply cuz u either skipped it or have serious lack of comprehension skills:
I was only comparing it to the wire in pacing terms, they literally the opposite in everything else what you even talking about
Just because Gilligan wants to make a minimalistic work doesn't make it better or worse than any other show with 200 characters
But for the average person it is, nobody said anything about what you value. We’re talking about casual viewers’ mixed reception to this series so far.
The casual audience member wants dialogue in their films and shows, that is undeniably true
I'm not just talking about what I value, I'm talking about what other people value as well. I don't feel that the reaction to this show is any more divisive than the one to BCS was. Also take into account, this is Apple TV's most streamed show.
This thread is gonna be a hilarious s***show for years
Well finally a fictional piece that provokes multiple conversations
The stakes are that our characters are trying to save the world. On top of that, the stakes are that our characters are trapped in a sociological experiment where they're suffering from loneliness on an extreme scale.
The stakes actually don't feel that high to me. So far I don't really care what happens to Carol if I'm honest, her loved one is gone and she doesn't really like people so she will probably be unhappy anyway. I assume she had no family as that's not been mentioned. Everyone else is happy.
I'm intrigued in how this season will end though and what "saving the world" means.
I would like to know what that alien signal was, what was significant about it since it was happening for millions of years, and why the signal was needed when they could turn all humans when they wanted to anyway (and I'm not sure how they did that).
I'm not just talking about what I value, I'm talking about what other people value as well. I don't feel that the reaction to this show is any more divisive than the one to BCS was. Also take into account, this is Apple TV's most streamed show.
Yeah off the Vince Gilligan name, he’s TV royalty
The interesting metrics will be how many people return for Season 2
Don't really mind the complaints. It is a pretty slow show. Doesn't mean it isn't actively building to something special.
Gilligan is a slow burner and most audiences haven't watched him from the start in real time. BB's crowd is almost entirely binge watchers. A lot of the audience here is goodwill from Gilligan's reputation more than it is the premise bringing them in.
Everything doesn't always have to come down to complaining about attention spans. What do you really expect when there's only 1 character and essentially no recurring cast? If you're not buying into Carol yet there's basically nothing to hold you down.
We don't actually know where this goes either or what the stakes really are.