why do you go out your way to defend garbage?

i think both the nav cover and wunna cover are pretty cool, they're at least interesting, in my opinion they're intentionally trying to look goofy. its like an art style.

how does it not fit? what virgil doing has been done before but sure isn’t having the same energy tho

i dont mean garbage, but say the nav cover for example. i know that the character looks goofy and a lot of people find it to be an awful cover, but i think its kind of humorous and cool, i havent seen that kind of art on many covers before, it doesnt dserve to be called outright garbage

I get they may look goofy,

but they took a lot of skill to make

anyone that studies 3D design can acknowledge this

Nah fr that’s pathetic. That is one of the worst cover arts I’ve ever seen. Look at how poorly cut out his head is. Virgil I hope you’re reading this bro that s*** garbage

virgil has designed some pretty cool stuff beforehand so it makes me think he wants to be making some kind of statement by doing these covers that seem half-assed

Need it without the date on

Virgil is incredibly hit or miss

yeah. and it kinda looks like a video game/cartoon which is commonplace in hiphop

wonder what yeezus cover reveal thread on ktt1 looks like

i dont think its the same. this s*** physically hurts me eyes. it's lazy and trash

i just can't believe people actually greenlit this s***. no one stepped up and said this s*** aint it?

Maybe the best album cover ever

Man giving us that 3% approach

agree, contemporary art needs more love

hmm ok

I seen this and had no idea it was real judging by how s***ty it looked, only to find out Virgil designed it.. which added to my shock

i reckon they want to popularize this as much as possible, not just money wise but legacy speaking, so putting his most popular photo or first to find at least on cover in a way immortalizes this and his image

i mean that by saying what is prolly their intention, not my defense or stand on it

????????