Wait don't backtrack now. You used an appeal to the majority to try to defend your argument and he brought up a legitimate response that there are PLENTY of examples in history where most people were wrong or even straight up immoral. Like slavery where the vast majority of people thought that was okay too. Point being, that's not a good counter argument
hes comparing people being forced away from their freedom, tortured and obligated to do stuff against their will, to people accepting there are only two genders, which is the truth biologically. by human characteristics there are two s***or genders, Male and Female. I'm not even hating on trans people, I agree they can feel however they like, but biologically you are either a man or a woman
Every public person thats ever been advocating for pedophilia has also been an intersectional queer activist
Make of it what you want to but people have been using one to get to the other for decades
I don’t want to be the guy that says being gay or anything opens the door for that because I 100% believe there is nothing harmful or wrong in being gay or trans. Pedophilia on the other hand is 100% wrong.
BUT I think a thick line needs to be drawn so people don’t open that door that leads to bullshit.
hes comparing people being forced away from their freedom, tortured and obligated to do stuff against their will, to people accepting there are only two genders, which is the truth biologically. by human characteristics there are two s***or genders, Male and Female. I'm not even hating on trans people, I agree they can feel however they like, but biologically you are either a man or a woman
Can you show me biological evidence of gender like I asked? You're stating things that are scientifically incorrect, as there are also more than two sexes.
when it gets to harming people
transgender people existing doesnt harm people
That’s a fact. 100% fact. That’s why all I’m asking is where do we draw the line
Can you show me biological evidence of gender like I asked? You're stating things that are scientifically incorrect, as there are also more than two sexes.
It's not that difficult, If you was born with a p**** you are man, if you are born with a vagina you are a woman.
It's not that difficult, If you was born with a p**** you are man, if you are born with a vagina you are a woman.
So you, a KTT2 poster, is the arbiter of scientific truth as opposed to the educated scientists who are educated and have researched this topic?
Yeah, all the state ain’t the same but I just feel being in the state hub of all that progressive liberal s*** like Cali would have you a bit more progressive on average.
Not everyone thinks the same man. That sheep mentality is worrisome, no matter what the topic is
@ASAP_RICKY
I'm not watching a 13 minutes video. Explain me what's the difference please. And genders are an invention, s***is not.
100% and I’m glad you said it but Blonded still has yet
Pedophilia has always been considered wrong but condemning having s***with minors above the age of 13/14 is fairly new since it’s only been a thing for the last idk 70 years. It doesnt mean f***ing a minor shouldnt be condemned. Something being a social construct doesnt make it any less valid when it protects individuals like kids
I'm not watching a 13 minutes video. Explain me what's the difference please. And genders are an invention, s***is not.
"I'm refusing to look at your evidence while not providing my own."
We have documented verified evidence as to how the brain ages and matures and how behaviors change as you age which is the basis (whether you agree or not, and this isn't the case for some outdated laws or beliefs) for laws.
Dude stop trying to be slick, once again all of that doesn’t equal to the number we are as far as age goes. It does not equal to “you can do this at this age and that at that age”, because if so the drinking age wouldn’t be 21 in America yet 19 in Canada. So once again, the ACTUAL number your age is and what it pertains (drinking, driving, etc) is a social construct. Not the act of getting older.
"I'm refusing to look at your evidence while not providing my own."
I'm asking you to resume the video for me
I'm asking you to resume the video for me
I'm asking you to have the human decency to educate yourself on topics before you engage in a discussion you are not qualified to speak on.
Pedophilia has always been considered wrong but condemning having s***with minors above the age of 13/14 is fairly new since it’s only been a thing for the last idk 70 years. It doesnt mean f***ing a minor shouldnt be condemned. Something being a social construct doesnt make it any less valid when it protects individuals like kids
And that’s why I’m asking him where does he personally feel like we draw the line. That’s all I’m asking.
I'm asking you to have the human decency to educate yourself on topics before you engage in a discussion you are not qualified to speak on.
I'm not wasting any more of my time, bye chief
@ASAP_RICKY
Hahahahaha Hahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahaha no
Dude stop trying to be slick, once again all of that doesn’t equal to the number we are as far as age goes. It does not equal to “you can do this at this age and that at that age”, because if so the drinking age wouldn’t be 21 in America yet 19 in Canada. So once again, the ACTUAL number your age is and what it pertains (drinking, driving, etc) is a social construct. Not the act of getting older.
I just don't understand what you're trying to say, man. I really don't. Are you saying that the numerical value we have associated with our age is a social construct? Yeah, it is, because we based that off of however long it takes the Earth to revolve around the Sun
Regressive, yes. But how many of y'all would be willing to press him about this to his face?
I am frankie ocean fan please watch my video on why biological s***is a spectrum pls guys :)
I'm not wasting any more of my time, bye chief
I ask you to show any shred of scientific evidence to back up any of your claims, while providing a very short concise video to back up what I'm saying, and you run away.