Not even, it’s just that a 1hr long album is not concise by any definition
What if every track slaps and weaves into each other?
Concise to me aint about length more the way the individual songs come together to make an album
What if every track slaps and weaves into each other?
Concise to me aint about length more the way the individual songs come together to make an album
This is just misunderstanding the definition of the word “concise” and not a different interpretation of the word
it always has to be posted.
What is better than this album lets be honest
This is just misunderstanding the definition of the word “concise” and not a different interpretation of the word
Oh yeah
“Airtight”
all the albums posted and you chose d'angelo and radiohead to call out. i'm praying for you
all the albums posted and you chose d'angelo and radiohead to call out. i'm praying for you
5 minutes of jamming is not “airtight”
Be objective
5 minutes of jamming is not “airtight”
Be objective
in the case of what i posted, in rainbows is 10 tracks 42 minutes and generally regarded by fans of the band as a skipless album. so there just must be a track or two you don't like off of it, which is fine lol
I ain’t even mad that we only got 12 tracks after 14 years. This is the definition of high quality.
wouldn't say either is perfect despite bot having some outstanding songs tbh
both aren't really albums either so it makes sense
I ain’t even mad that we only got 12 tracks after 14 years. This is the definition of high quality.
yaaa I need to run it back, might vibe with it for a bit this fall
i was thinking 30-35 mins or under would be the definition of concise
i think we can give a little more leeway to hip-hop, which often tends towards long-ass albums (and mixtapes!)
for instance to me Yeezus is def the album where kanye (whose albums to that point are all pretty long) best balances conciseness and overall quality
10 songs, 40 minutes
in many genres that would just describe a normal/standard album but i'd argue for its concision