The most basic example

Every country feels like they are not the ones responsible for climat change

A party that would run a global campaign of going coal less before 2035 would make the world a better place since all the countries that are a part of it are tightly connected and would be a lock to take action

That is practically textbook mutiny, attempting to organize an opposing government under a formally worldwide acknowledged government.

No idea why op is so quick to say without force

Also just say international proletarian revolution

Be specific, what "united goals"? What's your ideology? People want their needs met but everyone has different needs. They won't just vote for someone because they're apart of a brand.

It's not that simple because the goals of every nation are different. If you're in the United States you might not realize guns are not popular with the rest of the world. Gay marriage is still seen as wrong in a lot of countries and it will take multiple generations to turn that around. So who are you for and who are you against?

You're talking about starting a club not an identity. Read up more about social politics and world history to see why this won't work on a big scale. There's a reason it hasn't happened already. People naturally break into fringe groups like the left and right, alt left, alt right, centrists, liberal or neolibral, conservative and so on. It's hard to get everyone on the same page because people aren't monolithic, there's too much nuance.

@OP Creative thinking here, it's definitely an interesting thought experiment. Although I agree with the sentiment and notion, I very much doubt the probability of this working successfully in the contemporary. I mean look at the overall response to this idea in here; no one even wants to bother entertaining the idea, let alone introduce and vote for it. Maybe one day, when our collective emotional intelligence increases substantially, could someone introduce this idea and—slowly but surely—gain some momentum. But, at least for the time being, humanity is not (and may never be) ready for something like this. Only time will tell.

pretty much how socialist parties started

Who's paying for the campaign? A campaign that raises awareness for a problem we already know about. Any campaign would be useless if it doesn't pay more than big coal companies who will fight back harder to stop it before it even begins.

And I suppose this global party would be immune to the temptation and influence of billions in cash being snow-shoveled in their path by the energy industry and the dozen global industries that have been created by that one's byproducts?

And this party would also be immune to those with opposing self-interests infiltrating and manipulating how/what information is distributed on the social media-like phone app that you imagine everyone using to create this utopia?

If they someone are immune to those two things, then I know for a fact they won't be immune to corporate/intelligence-backed death squads, hired from and localized in virtually any region that sees democratic movements succeed without Daddy's permission.

The Waldo Moment (2014)

In fact lets say that by some impossible series of events an international poll does emerge to submit to the government of one particular nation (which would mean every other government across the world would even entertain this proposal period), and by some impossible chance the citizens of every other country agree to this. They would suddenly be staring down the barrel of every military force in the world including their own allies that would refuse to submit, if not outright burned to the ground. Unfortunately the idea of one gov rule will never happen without extreme force and extensive bloodshed.

I'm not well versed in history at all but Alexander the Great and Hitler are the most immediate one that comes to mind to attempt something like this, although the former was much more respectable and charismatic and the latter had the support of Japan. Oda Nobunaga was the most successful in this endeavor, although he "only" united all of Japan which was a hell of a feat in its own at the time, albeit with extensive force and bloodshed.

sounds like the term, "world order"

im good

yeah and then they would spend most of their time enacting tragic events and sparking political conflicts that lead to unnecessary wars in order to turn a profit...what if

no

Government should be as little as possible and for as small a community as to actually serve the people’s interests.

NWO

❤️

If a whole thread of niggas don’t get what you sayin maybe you didn’t explain yourself well enough