Trump has a right to believe votes fraudulent even if you disagree but he has taken it through the appropriate legal channels and there was no substantial evidence to support his claims.
Pence did his part in confirming who the actual president elect was and now Biden is the President.
It's almost like now that Trump is gone the media do not have anything to talk about so they are going to milk every story they can out of Trump and the runoff of his supporters.
I mean 75 million people think the election was truly rigged
And people also stormed the capitol to disrupt an election
Trump has a right to believe votes fraudulent even if you disagree but he has taken it through the appropriate legal channels
Sure...all legal...
He was also recorded trying to threaten the Georgia SoS into altering election results.
I mean 75 million people think the election was truly rigged
And people also stormed the capitol to disrupt an election
not EVERY trump support thought this c'mon dude there's enough disingenious energy as it is
not EVERY trump support thought this c'mon dude there's enough disingenious energy as it is
just going to say that
A completely fair election was lost and the f***er spent two months lying and begging every legal and illegal avenue possible to try to keep power.
“Find 11,000 votes”
A completely fair election was lost and the f***er spent two months lying and begging every legal and illegal avenue possible to try to keep power.
“Find 11,000 votes”
yea but he didn't and democracy ended up winning
yea but he didn't and democracy ended up winning
Yes, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a threat to it
Imagine if these states did “find” votes and overturned an election that every channel (except MAGA) has said is completely legit.
Trump has a right to believe votes fraudulent even if you disagree but he has taken it through the appropriate legal channels
!https://youtu.be/lX2gQsQElJY
Sure...all legal...
Everyone thinks they just walked in, nah lol look at these animals. And look at the comments blaming “BLM or Antifa” wtf is antifa anyways
i hate bringing up the 2016 election since we are in 2021 now but couldn't you say a lot of parallel behavior happened in 2016 between PSAs from celebs trying to persuade consciences electors to not elect Trump, petitions to not give Trump the presidency and all the Russia stuff
not EVERY trump support thought this c'mon dude there's enough disingenious energy as it is
i think the majority believed him that it was rigged/fraud
Trump has a right to believe votes fraudulent even if you disagree but he has taken it through the appropriate legal channels
!https://youtu.be/lX2gQsQElJY
Sure...all legal...
Like i said earlier Trump can believe what he wants but he still needs to go through the appropriate policies and procedures.
The fact that twitter took the time to put in the disclaimer is proof of what im trying to argue in the OP
He was also recorded trying to threaten the Georgia SoS into altering election results.
probably part of the reason he was impeached a second time
i guess the whole thread can be boiled down to i dont like when the media uses dumb buzz phrases to heat up the country.
not EVERY trump support thought this c'mon dude there's enough disingenious energy as it is
I live in the south. A lot of conservatives believe the election was rigged. Like a scary amount
Like i said earlier Trump can believe what he wants but he still needs to go through the appropriate policies and procedures.
The fact that twitter took the time to put in the disclaimer is proof of what im trying to argue in the OP
The fact that twitter took the time to put in the disclaimer is proof of what im trying to argue in the OP
How? A privately owned company is well within their rights to challenge disinformation on their platform. Trump is not entitled to argue and react however he wants without critique.
He was only silenced (on a privately owned platform) when he held direct, obvious influence over a riot that led to multiple deaths. If Republicans want to hop on their cross over that, they can take 5 minutes to read up on what free speech actually entails.
i hate bringing up the 2016 election since we are in 2021 now but couldn't you say a lot of parallel behavior happened in 2016 between PSAs from celebs trying to persuade consciences electors to not elect Trump, petitions to not give Trump the presidency and all the Russia stuff
Hillary had conceded within 24 hours
The fact that twitter took the time to put in the disclaimer is proof of what im trying to argue in the OP
How? A privately owned company is well within their rights to challenge disinformation on their platform. Trump is not entitled to argue and react however he wants without critique.
He was only silenced (on a privately owned platform) when he held direct, obvious influence over a riot that led to multiple deaths. If Republicans want to hop on their cross over that, they can take 5 minutes to read up on what free speech actually entails.
I'm not arguing against Twitter. I'm arguing that including a disclaimer under any post that has anything to do with election results proves that the democratic process is alive not only within the government but within influential companies who try to ensure that the public gets appropriate information and that mass media is going to continue to sensationlize this ever present threat to democracy even tho Trump is gone at this point.
EDIT: cause they don't have anything to talk about now and they thrive off of putting the public in this tribalism mindset
Hillary had conceded within 24 hours
yea but he ultimately followed through with the transfer of power.
don't presidents hold the right to challenge election results?