Reply
  • May 22, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    blase

    Neither should be put in prison for enrolling their kid in an outside district. They just throw you prison for anything. This is a non-violent act and is also a stupid law.

    That's not what the woman got 5 years for she had priors, got caught with intent to sell, robbed a bank and had a weapons charge if I'm correct. I think there was even more too. Usually these long sentences for light s*** is the result of priors or them finally getting them on something when they're doing other s***. It's like when Al Capone got so many years for tax evasion, its really to punish the other s*** they did. It becomes cumulative at that point.

  • May 22, 2020
    ·
    edited

    pretty misleading tweet and even thread title

    coulda shined light on injustice with exact crimes on an endless list of examples

  • blase 🦋
    May 22, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Gangstalicious

    That's not what the woman got 5 years for she had priors, got caught with intent to sell, robbed a bank and had a weapons charge if I'm correct. I think there was even more too. Usually these long sentences for light s*** is the result of priors or them finally getting them on something when they're doing other s***. It's like when Al Capone got so many years for tax evasion, its really to punish the other s*** they did. It becomes cumulative at that point.

    I wasnt implying that she got 5 years for that incident. I said neither should be sentenced to prison for enrolling their child in the wrong district. So you shouldn't be able to use that incident to increase someone's prison time either because it's not something that should be consider prison worthy to begin with.

  • May 22, 2020
    ·
    edited

    This woman got 15 days jail time that reverted to 5 years when a d*** sentence was thrown on top of it.

    The message is on point and I don't think throwing someone in jail 5 years for selling d**** is the right way to solve that issue (I guess she had other priors as well?), but the examples here don't really line up.

  • May 22, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    blase

    I wasnt implying that she got 5 years for that incident. I said neither should be sentenced to prison for enrolling their child in the wrong district. So you shouldn't be able to use that incident to increase someone's prison time either because it's not something that should be consider prison worthy to begin with.

    Yeah I don't think anyone should be sentenced for that but again it was moreso because they found a charge that could stick and she had priors. It's easier that way and takes less resources than building another investigation for the other s***.

  • blase 🦋
    May 22, 2020
    Gangstalicious

    Yeah I don't think anyone should be sentenced for that but again it was moreso because they found a charge that could stick and she had priors. It's easier that way and takes less resources than building another investigation for the other s***.

    Well in this case I wouldn't say the out of district charge stuck more. They seem to have charged and sentenced her with that incident and the d*** incident at the same time. They could've just sentenced her off the d*** incidents alone as there was already an investigation for them but I know how they do

  • May 22, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    No Pressure

    Lori does, you can't bribe your privileged kids way into school.

    Money talks

    Plus, everyone knows schools like these are just status symbols more than anything.

  • May 22, 2020
    NakedBalenciaga

    I would give her something hefty

    her daughters too

  • May 22, 2020

    Bimbo twitter strikes again lmao

  • May 22, 2020
    Pusha P

    Money talks

    Plus, everyone knows schools like these are just status symbols more than anything.

    More than status brother. You go to school like that plus your last name, no company tells you no.

  • May 22, 2020
    NakedBalenciaga

    I would give her something hefty

    It ain't even a question

  • May 22, 2020
    ucantlickyourelbow

    Seems like the Cops couldn't bust her for the dealing and pandering and set her up on a technical charge instead. Anyone smart would be up in arms about this, since police bending the rules to get revenge on someone is a slippery slope.

    They did it with OJ no?

  • ucantlickyourelbow

    Seems like the Cops couldn't bust her for the dealing and pandering and set her up on a technical charge instead. Anyone smart would be up in arms about this, since police bending the rules to get revenge on someone is a slippery slope.

    i mean it's not really petty revenge

    she's showing a history of committing crime over and over again and no remorse.
    it's forever f*** the police but not every black person in prison is there bc the system is broken