How do we know this? I don’t want to go back and read this whole thread.
Genius and other off brand lyric sites were the only source for the credits. He's not credited officially anywhere on any of the tracks he supposedly helped write. Also, here's a conversation between what I can only presume is Noah, and a Wikipedia editor discussing whether or not they should leave his credits up (they didn't)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Noah_Sammak
Someone please give a summary on what happened
![]()
@S open a gofundme, all of us pitch in. Use the money to counter sue, win the lawsuit and divide the profits among your KTT brothers.
@​S open a gofundme, all of us pitch in. Use the money to counter sue, win the lawsuit and divide the profits among your KTT brothers.
When S secures a penny for each of us
When S secures a penny for each of us
If he claims to be affiliated to the Weeknd, then we should potentially get that Weeknd money (or the label he's signed to)
books.google.com/books?id=snM9xQEACAAJ&sitesec=reviews
"The book came with photos of Noah sucking some male toes, I don't know what's happening but I gave this book to my 7 year old daughter and she came up crying to me."
What page did this thread pop off?
Off the rip tbh

YOU HAVE BEEN VISTED BY COOKIE MONSTER SAMMAK. REPOST THIS IMAGE OR HE GETS A WRITING CREDIT ON YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE
This is not a book to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force.
In one place in “Shades,” and in the restricted space of two-thirds of a page, Sammak has scored 114 offenses against literary art out of a possible 115. It breaks the record. There are two ways of disliking poetry; one way is to dislike it; the other is to read Shades. As a writer he has mastered everything except language; as a novelist he can do everything except tell a story; as an artist he is everything except articulateÂ, he leads his readers to the latrine and locks them in.
But the amount of utter s*** in the volume is almost infinite — s*** conceptionÂ, execution, dialogue and sentiment. Whoever buys the book on the strength of Noah's reputation, will be cheating himself of his money, and we believe we shall never see the man who has endured the reading of the whole of it…. Comment upon the structure is needless. But even this string of nonsense is equalled by the nonsense that is strung upon it, in the way of crazy sentiment and exaggerateÂd passion. What the book means, we know not. To save it from almost utter worthlessnÂess, it must be called a prose poem, and even then, it might be supposed to emanate from a lunatic hospital rather than from Australia. We say it with grief — it is too bad for Mr. Sammak to abuse his really fine talents as he does. A hundred times better if he kept them in a napkin all his natural life.
it's kinda crazy none of us thought of that though, that could've been any of our names up in the thread title
talk about yourself pls