Tbone

5y

· edited

Have you studied economy ?

And oil is not going to take over because it’s a resource not a dollar value. We have more oil than we have of anything except maybe water

Synopsis

5y

You realize bernie wants to cap eliminate premiums, cap d*** prices so no one pays more than 200$ a year and make it so you don't get billed for visiting the doctor or hospital right?

Synopsis

5y

You realize bernie wants to cap eliminate premiums, cap d*** prices so no one pays more than 200$ a year and make it so you don't get billed for visiting the doctor or hospital right?

Tbone

5y

That’s what they want you to think, the polls are iffy

Tbone

5y

The current president also wants to lower d*** prices but he’s being blocked from doing it.

So what, it has to be Democrat’s who push things forward otherwise it gets blocked? Then people claim republicans never do anything? Yeah because they’re always being blocked.

Synopsis

5y

Why lie lol

https://khn.org/news/gop-senators-distance-themselves-from-grassley-and-trumps-efforts-to-cut-drug-prices/amp/

The GOP blocked it

Synopsis

5y

You realize bernie wants to cap eliminate premiums, cap d*** prices so no one pays more than 200$ a year and make it so you don't get billed for visiting the doctor or hospital right?

Tbone

5y

Everyone wants to do that Synopsis

But it’s about the other side allowing it to happen I.e. votes. Presidents always get blocked by the opposition.. so even if Bernie wants it, the republicans will have to “let” him do it just like the Democrats have to “let” trump do it or it won’t ever happen

Even though it is clearly bipartisan it actually isn’t .. they just want our votes

Because Democrats always say stuff and then they don’t do it after they’re elected. The same can happen for republicans of course

Synopsis

5y

No not everyone wants to do that lmao. Others want some s***ty bound to fail public option. And thats why bernie understands you have to have the people on your side. He's already said he'll primary anyone who tries to prevent it

Tbone

5y

· edited

Sounds like a dictator to me

Like Canada’s current pm who is a dictator

How you might ask? Similar to what you said about Bernie. Anyone who he doesn’t like gets crushed, what do I mean?

Well for exam0e, last year there was a university in Canada that has two groups one is pro life the other is pro choice. Well the Pm of Canada states that any school group that is against pro choice will no longer be funded or given the scholarships they were supposed to get for creating a club etc...

That’s dictatorship, he’s choosing to give power to certain Canadians over other Canadians.

Another example is m103 a motion that the PM set forth which criminalizes anyone who is islamophobic (I know it’s not a word that is the point) p. The reason they use that term and they chose not to define it within the law in fine prints is because they want it to be ambiguous so they can ruin people’s career for simply saying “Islam is not a peaceful religion” or whatever you might say. Anywho , vote for your choice but be wary of snakes 🐍

Tbone

5y

· edited

Sounds like a dictator to me

Like Canada’s current pm who is a dictator

How you might ask? Similar to what you said about Bernie. Anyone who he doesn’t like gets crushed, what do I mean?

Well for exam0e, last year there was a university in Canada that has two groups one is pro life the other is pro choice. Well the Pm of Canada states that any school group that is against pro choice will no longer be funded or given the scholarships they were supposed to get for creating a club etc...

That’s dictatorship, he’s choosing to give power to certain Canadians over other Canadians.

Another example is m103 a motion that the PM set forth which criminalizes anyone who is islamophobic (I know it’s not a word that is the point) p. The reason they use that term and they chose not to define it within the law in fine prints is because they want it to be ambiguous so they can ruin people’s career for simply saying “Islam is not a peaceful religion” or whatever you might say. Anywho , vote for your choice but be wary of snakes 🐍

Kub

5y

Discord Democratic Socialists stand up!!!!

Synopsis

5y

Im communist not a dem soc.

Synopsis

5y

Or a president who actually wants whats best for the people

Tbone

5y

Sounds like a dictator to me

Like Canada’s current pm who is a dictator

How you might ask? Similar to what you said about Bernie. Anyone who he doesn’t like gets crushed, what do I mean?

Well for exam0e, last year there was a university in Canada that has two groups one is pro life the other is pro choice. Well the Pm of Canada states that any school group that is against pro choice will no longer be funded or given the scholarships they were supposed to get for creating a club etc...

That’s dictatorship, he’s choosing to give power to certain Canadians over other Canadians.

Another example is m103 a motion that the PM set forth which criminalizes anyone who is islamophobic (I know it’s not a word that is the point) p. The reason they use that term and they chose not to define it within the law in fine prints is because they want it to be ambiguous so they can ruin people’s career for simply saying “Islam is not a peaceful religion” or whatever you might say. Anywho , vote for your choice but be wary of snakes 🐍

Synopsis

5y

That's not what a dictator is lol. Not even close. Dictators aren't democratically elected and are not subject to checks on their power

Tbone

5y

Just because he was elected doesn’t mean he can’t be a dictator sure he was elected but he still uses his PM powers in ways that are against the way laws are set out to be. Laws are supposed to make all people in the country equal, they’re absolutely not supposed to give certain groups of people extra advantages. Why wouldn’t I choose to be a Muslim since it’s so much easier to get a job now as a muslim in Canada because if they don’t hire you you can argue it was islamophobia and that alone can scare employers into hiring you. This is totally wrong.

Another law he set up is if you mix gender someone I.e. if I am currently idenifying as a woman and you say hey sir, I can have you lose your job or worse in some instances.. it’s already happened it was a huge news thing when it happened even though people kept saying “no one will abuse the law” people did almost immediately,

You’re not supposed to give a certain group of people privileges that others don’t get. That’s the beginning of a dictatorship. Read about dictatorships and you’ll see it’s not always someone who just takes over by force it can happen slowly over time too

In fact, all of the important/noteworthy things that the Pm of Canada has done so far has been this kind of stuff. The only other thing I can think of that he did aside from unbalance they laws in made cannabis legal and even that has been unsuccessful in deterring the black market and getting kids to stop using

Synopsis

5y

There is just so much wrong with this I don't know where to begin.

One of the core tenants of modern liberal ideology is to make sure that you give certain "privileges" to those who have been historically disenfranchised to level the playing field. It has nothing to do with dictatorship.

Hell if you're theory was correct then there'd just be a bunch of canadians converting to Islam which isn't the case.

Tbone

5y

My theory is not a theory p. This is what is happening in Canada. And actually people have already abused these laws I already told you.

No people aren’t going to convert because most of us are christians in Canada, we aren’t going to convert for anything

Ps helping people who are disenfranchised has already happened,

This is way beyond that, this is giving people who are already doing just as well as the rest of us a privilege they don’t need. I have never seen anyone make fun of someone for real for bein black or white or Muslim or Christian etc.. and when you do see it it’s only the few a******s who are like that. They certainly did not need this sort of law being pushed in 2017 to today.

This is not the same as what you’re saying. Yes we should make things equal but guess what we’re all Canadian here. We’re already equal. This is making the laws unequal and everyone knows it,

People in Canada should have the full right to criticize Islam if they want. We already have laws in place which protect against actual discrimination but calling it islamophobia and not giving a definition to that term just leaves the door open meaning I could say I don’t have any Muslim friends and that could be taken as “islamophobia” simply because they chose not to define it in the clause

This is how countries get destroyed. Start with a law that gives certain people a safety then eventually it becomes another law and another.. most people are much too busy to pay attention to all the laws passing. So they eventually get passed and we eventually no longer have Canada we have a new country in which muslims are the rulers. This is something that Islam has done for hundreds of years, they know they can’t defeat us with military assault so they do it like this.

Now I’m not saying that will happen but it has happened often in the past, it’s what Islam is used for. Yes many use it for true religion but many use it to infiltrate. There is a reason people criticize Islam and for it to be illegal to even talk about Islam like I am right now is silly.

You can criticize any other religion as much as you want but not Islam in Canada
In Canada you can not criticize Islam but you can call for the death of all the Jews and Christians and Buddhists and Sikh etc

What I am really saying is if someone is a Muslim and they don’t like what I am saying p, they don’t like my jive, they can pretty easily find a way to call me islamophobic and bring me to jail or make me lose my career etc.. if someone doesn’t like you they can do something about it and it has already happened..

This is an attack on our sovereignty over our own thoughts in Canada aka free speech what you call it in the USA

Synopsis

5y

I can't take anything you say particularly seriously. but

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-318.html

If you call for the death of jews, sikhs, buddhists or christians in canada, it is literally a crime lol.

Tbone

5y

· edited

The point is I can say anything about Jewish people or christians and no one cares but if I say “Islam has created terrorists.” I could lose my life and possibly go to prison

Calling for the death of anyone is a crime I was trying to prove a point, you know what I mean anyways I’m sure

Synopsis

5y

No you couldn't. Why are you lying?

Tbone

5y

That’s what they want you to think, the polls are iffy

Tbone

5y

· edited

Yes I could. Research m103 Canada

Lose my life as in career and such not be put to death

Once M103 becomes a Law it will happen

Right now it’s still just M103 aka a motion
But once it’s a bill and put into law I will not be able to even say what I have said to you in this forum without the worry of going to prison. Lots of people in Canada are against this but it doesn’t matter. It will happen based on the House of Commons voting

Synopsis

5y

I know what m103 is. It is literally a non-binding motion. That means it is not a law, it is not a bill, it is a motion for the government to condemn islamaphobia and study how to reduce hate crimes and collect data on hate crimes.