Reply
  • Sep 20, 2024

    TLDW: UMG & Facebook/Meta are partnering to have UMG artists release music through IG and having song shares/reel remixes count toward a sale of a song/album instead of a stream.

  • Sep 20, 2024

    What’s Mal take on it because I believe the opposite of what he believes automatically

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    so basically UMG saw how successful the carti songs were on IG and now they wanna capitalize on that with even more bullshit loopholes?

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    You lost your rabbit ass mind if you think im pressing play on a mal video lmao

  • Sep 20, 2024
    Sir Swagalot

    so basically UMG saw how successful the carti songs were on IG and now they wanna capitalize on that with even more bullshit loopholes?

    Literally can’t have a single thing anymore without money hungry suits tryna get a slice. Genuinely exhausting

  • Sep 20, 2024
    allmygirlsdoyoga

    You lost your rabbit ass mind if you think im pressing play on a mal video lmao

    Worst podcaster of all time 🔥

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    3 replies

    What if the way to get people to listen to more music...is by actually signing real talent instead of flash in the pan acts who trended on Tiktok...and then develop that talent into making music that can stick...and then doing proper promo and marketing for them and their singles?

    Crazy idea I'm sure.

  • Sep 20, 2024

    Mal has a slappable ozempic face

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    no, its just another added avenue that is moreso for the label/artists than consumers

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    I'm confused, haven't reels already counted towards streams?

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Water Giver

    no, its just another added avenue that is moreso for the label/artists than consumers

    gotta be cuz who is habitually listening to music on IG?

  • Sep 20, 2024

    This s*** is exhausting. I'm going back to buying CDs.

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    2 replies
    Smacked Voodoo

    What if the way to get people to listen to more music...is by actually signing real talent instead of flash in the pan acts who trended on Tiktok...and then develop that talent into making music that can stick...and then doing proper promo and marketing for them and their singles?

    Crazy idea I'm sure.

    cost too much money

  • Sep 20, 2024
    Sir Swagalot

    gotta be cuz who is habitually listening to music on IG?

    yeah and you cant search people out outside of a post neither - unless they make it like some myspace s*** where you can listen and/or put songs profiles but even then its the same thing

    streaming is great for labels, not th eartists, this is just another avenue for labels to consistently use their artists on other platforms in a copyrighted, pay out and papertrail type of way

  • Sep 20, 2024
    Smacked Voodoo

    What if the way to get people to listen to more music...is by actually signing real talent instead of flash in the pan acts who trended on Tiktok...and then develop that talent into making music that can stick...and then doing proper promo and marketing for them and their singles?

    Crazy idea I'm sure.

    Talented people want money and fair contacts lol. Motherfuckers chasing trends want a quick buck and will sign anything. The idea is that it's cheaper for these labels to take chances on literal, untalented nobodies trending on Social Media vs someone with real buzz and talent, 100 times over.

    They'll keep signing social media duds, until they get that 1 star they can make 1000x profit on, then they'll sign him/her to a real contract.

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    insertcoolnamehere

    cost too much money

    Well then they can continue losing money on these flop artists and their arena tours they can't sell out while desperately tryna squeeze pocket change out via streaming tricks and loopholes

  • Sep 20, 2024

    spotify fumbled they shoulda let artists upload stories on their spotify profiles

    mind you this sounds horrible but still

  • Sep 20, 2024
    TheFader

    I'm confused, haven't reels already counted towards streams?

    They are but they’re adding shares to the mix so sharing a song that’s uploaded to IG can count as a sale

  • Sep 20, 2024
    Smacked Voodoo

    What if the way to get people to listen to more music...is by actually signing real talent instead of flash in the pan acts who trended on Tiktok...and then develop that talent into making music that can stick...and then doing proper promo and marketing for them and their singles?

    Crazy idea I'm sure.

    Most Labels follow trends, not make them

    If cheaper to sign an artist with some sort of buzz and virality then put money into artist development and hope the investment pays off

  • Sep 20, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Smacked Voodoo

    Well then they can continue losing money on these flop artists and their arena tours they can't sell out while desperately tryna squeeze pocket change out via streaming tricks and loopholes

    capitalism never relied on common sense

  • Sep 20, 2024
    insertcoolnamehere

    cost too much money

    And A&R teams have deadlines to meet per contract, which these days can be quickly met by signing artists with large social media followings than waste money and time doing proper development.

  • Sep 20, 2024
    insertcoolnamehere

    capitalism never relied on common sense

    Shareholders want their returns, they don't care about artist development if it ain't bringing in easy money. So labels follow their wishes.