... okay

am i wrong?

If you're insinuating mfs was just walking around naked before Christianity than yes you're very wrong

what does this mean in relation to parents potentially not wanting to be forced into the conversation within their first 10 or so years?

i posted before the edit, but again i say as someone who doesnt have a problem wit the lifestyle

christianity made nudity sinful or whatever
not saying everyone was nude but they made it inherently “wrong” if that makes sense
like nudity wasn’t always sexual/sinful and the cultural shift was due to the spread of christianity

we do have to be conscious of the loophole this creates for creeps though. if some pervert can just say he identifies as a woman as means to go look at underage girls at a spa it is a problem

"after a man walked in"

Oh god I'm about to act up

Everybody always says "don't generalize!!!" but when it's time to call trans women dangerous perverts LET'S GOOOOOO

iirc it wasn't sinful just shameful but I don't really think most of that ties to Christianity in the modern world.

she aint cappin . he do got a D*** so he a NIGGA , but damn let sis rock out wit her cock out man we love everybody no need to be an a******

rip your account homie <3

It's disheartening being trans and reading this kind of stuff

What i say that was wrong ?

you can think that but ur not right

what the f***

who is doing that???

strawman argument

What's even the point of debating any of this

I can think that? I've read the bible in full multiple times just post a verse that contradicts what I said

and how do you explain the same sentiment across non christian cultures?

So what's the problem?

Karen's going to complain about anything

You guys wouldn't go out of your way to talk or look at people's genitalia but when it's trans people yall turn into the f***ing cock inspector

in his defense OP was scrambling for a source after ppl aint like the first one