Reply
  • ·
    1 reply
    Dropped stomp

    What damage control ? S*** wasn’t going to stop with one tumble especially considering the majority that have seen it believe it’s an alright film,

    DC comes out with something that reviews well and you won’t say one word, but go ahead and wear yourself out.

    Ah yeah the 200 people that have seen the movie and actually like it is certainly helping DC Studios

    Maybe they should focus on making good movies so that I don’t have to talk s***

  • ·
    1 reply
    Sonyomom

    Ah yeah the 200 people that have seen the movie and actually like it is certainly helping DC Studios

    Maybe they should focus on making good movies so that I don’t have to talk s***

    Man of tomorrow soon
    Clayface soon

  • ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    Man of tomorrow soon
    Clayface soon

    I’m excited for MoT but Clayface hasn’t really grabbed me yet.

    Just hope Gunn steps up with the talent he involves in these

  • Sonyomom

    I’m excited for MoT but Clayface hasn’t really grabbed me yet.

    Just hope Gunn steps up with the talent he involves in these

    He’s gotta oversee this s*** more too lol. Craig doesn’t seem like he was the right man for this.

  • Safran too but maybe they actually need Safran to work less

  • thewrap.com/creative-content/movies/supergirl-box-office-bomb-explained

    Some industry insiders who spoke to TheWrap say the problems run deeper than one underperforming film. “All this is, is a Gunn and Safran production deal,” one DC insider said of DC Films’ current trajectory. “It’s not a brand. Announcing a universe was dumb. DC created an expectation and now you have delivered one Superman movie.”

    With the Paramount-WBD merger looming, a top agent even questioned whether Gunn survives the fallout. “I don’t know how nervous DC is, but certainly James Gunn should be nervous,” the agent said. “There will always be a DC and the current execs have survived previous regime changes, but I don’t think Gunn survives.”

    A Warner Bros. insider pushed back on concern over Gunn and Safran’s larger strategy or any potential leadership changes to be made by Ellison, reiterating that they have a 10-year DC plan and “Supergirl” was just a single-film miss. The insider said the studio is “disappointed” with the film’s performance, adding the character “didn’t connect.”

    The narrative has begun

    Gunn might have his way out lmao

  • Wild idea:

    What if they made Batman a recurring antagonist in this universe?

    Rather than having two separate live-action Batman franchises running simultaneously, what if instead they used the character as the antagonist in these villain-led films? (Clayface, Bane/Deathstroke, etc.)

    He would still be a good guy obviously, but he would be an antagonist solely from a structure standpoint

    The villains are the main characters of these films and the stories follow them, but Batman is their main adversary the entire time, you could almost make him a horror-esque villain