Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Jan 2, 2020
    figarooooo

    Corey D***erson

    Marlin legend

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Nats will have Howie Kendrick and Starlin Castro at second. Howie can split time across second and first to keep Ryan Zimmerman from being overworked.

    With the situation at second figured out, Carter Kieboom has become a good trade chip for us. Kris Bryant? More likely than it was yesterday.

  • Jan 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

  • Jan 4, 2020
    Osey

    New Mets logo

  • Unity 💯
    Jan 4, 2020
    Noir

    Nats will have Howie Kendrick and Starlin Castro at second. Howie can split time across second and first to keep Ryan Zimmerman from being overworked.

    With the situation at second figured out, Carter Kieboom has become a good trade chip for us. Kris Bryant? More likely than it was yesterday.

    Cubs not budging unless Robles is included

  • Unity 💯
    Jan 4, 2020

    And if we include Robles in a trade for anyone not named Mike Trout Mookie Betts or Christian Yelich I will have to seriously reconsider being a Nationals fan

  • Jan 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Considering Bryant would basically be a rental, Carter Kieboom and a couple pitching prospects would be a very fair offer.

    We shouldn't even be talking about this because simply giving Rendon what he wanted made the most sense. Oh well.

  • Jan 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Noir

    Considering Bryant would basically be a rental, Carter Kieboom and a couple pitching prospects would be a very fair offer.

    We shouldn't even be talking about this because simply giving Rendon what he wanted made the most sense. Oh well.

    Kieboom isn't that good, man

  • Jan 4, 2020
    Osey

    bruh when i saw that s*** on mlb

  • Jan 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    figarooooo

    Kieboom isn't that good, man

    He grades out as a top 15-20 prospect with a really good arm and had a .900+ OPS in AAA. He's a good trade chip. We also have some quality pitchers in the farm.

    Padres would make sense as a trade destination because they have great pitching prospects, he can play outfield behind Machado, and he's a west coast guy, but they haven't shown interest lately. Braves could easily put together a better package, but they're more interested in retaining Donaldson. Tbh I don't know where he ends up, I just know we've reached out with this Castro signing going down.

  • Jan 4, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Noir
    · edited

    He grades out as a top 15-20 prospect with a really good arm and had a .900+ OPS in AAA. He's a good trade chip. We also have some quality pitchers in the farm.

    Padres would make sense as a trade destination because they have great pitching prospects, he can play outfield behind Machado, and he's a west coast guy, but they haven't shown interest lately. Braves could easily put together a better package, but they're more interested in retaining Donaldson. Tbh I don't know where he ends up, I just know we've reached out with this Castro signing going down.

    sounds like Urias and he was a bum. 2B prospects have the highest bust rate for a reason

    Padres do make sense but since we aren't winning the WS this year it doesn't make sense to pay what he would cost at this point

    Braves definitely have the farm to add him and he makes sense, they're definitely getting someone

    i bet he stays put tho

  • Jan 4, 2020
    ·
    edited
    figarooooo

    sounds like Urias and he was a bum. 2B prospects have the highest bust rate for a reason

    Padres do make sense but since we aren't winning the WS this year it doesn't make sense to pay what he would cost at this point

    Braves definitely have the farm to add him and he makes sense, they're definitely getting someone

    i bet he stays put tho

    Kieboom is a natural SS, not 2B. But if we kept him he would be in competition for 2B unless Trea got hurt.

    I do think Bryant makes most sense in Chicago, it's just that their organization has been tight with contracts after a period of intense spending and I bet they ultimately let him walk the way we did Harper. If they 100% believe they're winning a title with him in the next two years, it would be logical not to shop him. Seems unlikely though.

  • Jan 4, 2020

    Padres superpen

  • Jan 6, 2020

    FanGraphs senior writer Dan Szymborski hasn’t released his full ZiPS projections for 2020 yet, but he did give a sneak peek at the forecast for Torres’ next five years on Friday as part of his annual recap of the Yankees’ season. Feast your eyes, Yankees fans:

    2020: .287/.348/.557; 136 OPS+; 41 HR
    2021: .292/.357/.588; 146 OPS+; 44 HR
    2022: .289/.357/.586; 145 OPS+; 44 HR
    2023: .289/.359/.602; 150 OPS+; 47 HR
    2024: .287/.360/.601; 150 OPS+; 47 HR

    mlb.com/news/gleyber-torres-projected-to-have-massive-2020-season

  • Unity 💯
    Jan 6, 2020

    Not even going to come close to those projections

  • Unity 💯
    Jan 6, 2020

    And not projected to hit .300 even once? Lmao

  • Jan 6, 2020

    Mans still hating on Gleyber.

  • Yo guys did anyone ever hear word on Pat/Patridge (Cubs fan)?

  • Jan 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    MLB.com power rankings are trash

    1. Yankees
    2. Dodgers
    3. Astros
    4. Twins
    5. Rays
    6. Braves
    7. Nationals
    8. Cardinals
    9. Athletics
    10. Phillies
    11. Diamondbacks
    12. Cubs
    13. Reds
    14. Indians
    15. Brewers
    16. Red Sox
    17. White Sox
    18. Mets
    19. Angels
    20. Rangers

    they really left the Padres off the list entirely how do you sleep this hard

  • Unity 💯
    Jan 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    figarooooo

    MLB.com power rankings are trash

    1. Yankees
    2. Dodgers
    3. Astros
    4. Twins
    5. Rays
    6. Braves
    7. Nationals
    8. Cardinals
    9. Athletics
    10. Phillies
    11. Diamondbacks
    12. Cubs
    13. Reds
    14. Indians
    15. Brewers
    16. Red Sox
    17. White Sox
    18. Mets
    19. Angels
    20. Rangers

    they really left the Padres off the list entirely how do you sleep this hard

    Why is having the Nationals at 7 laughable? If anything they should be higher. Twins at 4? Braves at 6? But Nationals at 7 is what made you laugh?

  • Jan 7, 2020
    Unity

    Why is having the Nationals at 7 laughable? If anything they should be higher. Twins at 4? Braves at 6? But Nationals at 7 is what made you laugh?

    twins at 4 is a joke too tbh, don't trust their rotation behind berrios

    And now that I'm looking at it I'd maybe have probably only have like 2 teams behind the Nats over em so it's not really laughable you're right.

    I do like Braves at 6, with the assumption they get Donaldson. They're gooood.

  • Imagine snitching

  • Jan 7, 2020

  • Jan 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    These cheat hack teams gotta be stopped.

  • Jan 7, 2020

    Boston teams really love to cheat.

Thread was locked by
a moderator