same reaction 10 years ago when us conspiracy nuts were ‘rambling’ about things that are being discussed in this thread nowadays

⏸️

You could convince a nigga the earth was flat as long as you said it was in the epstein files

What are you trying to insinuate here?

It was one of the first things that came to my mind, poor children being more than just SAd, they straight scare em anyway possible to get the adrenaline runnin

Even if that shii ain’t real, just them actually thinkin is real is enough for them to do it

There’s way too much info. I can’t even keep up with this s***

Thank you Britain for doing the investigative journalism that our own country’s media has no desire to do about a scandal in our own country

It's a legit political tactic they're using... "Flooding the Zone"

It’s all goy boy conspiracy theories and antisemitism

You may be regarded

Yes you dumb goy

It was “release the files” for years and now that people’s favorite celebs are in them it’s now “being in them doesn’t mean anything”

GOY 🫵

Deadass

Some of yall niggas been posting some interesting this week. And I’m using interesting in a derogatory manner btw

Normies are so f***ing stupid because you can tell them the truth and they won’t believe it. They wait until some “authority figure” validates that reality for them.

And funnily enough, a lot of these “authority figures” have direct ties to corroborating or covering up for Epstein’s operation.

Epstein coined the normie masses “high restrictor individuals”. In the emails they discussed ways to control the normie masses, and imo their operation was hugely successful (thanks to the BBC, New York Post , Wikipedia,Reddit , 4chan, etc. all being Mossad counterintelligence pawn pieces ).

Whats is said in the e-mails regarding this?

He probably gets pegged

Read about it here.

justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00975405.pdf

is Epstein and Maxwell the only people to be arrested for this? usually when a s***trafficking ring gets busted, you'll see 10+ people mug shots posted.. although I've noticed those people usually look poor

All those gov links are a trap, they'll track you. Summarize here

Subject: Re: The benefits of deception
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:03:59 +0000
deception and self- deception , need better definitions. The recent work suggests that denial. is localized in the
brain. A restrictor of harmful information.- when knocked out. deception increases. i.e. knowing death is
within 100 years. is a knock out. a defect in the restrictor seems to increase the likelihood of depression.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Joscha Bach < > wrote:
Kevin, thank you for your excellent input and inspired questions on this topic!

The broad idea is that we'll need to build slack into systems of ubiquitous computing. That there's a paradox
in that in order to have a cohesive identity, certain aspects of our lives require omission (or e.g., deception).
There are two sides to this: first of all, many of our interaction partners may have difficulties to accept (or even
comprehend) the interactions and social norms that we maintain in other contexts (think: living in a small town
in the midwest vs visiting Burning Man; religious community vs. less usual sexual interests; family life vs.
work life; organizational role vs. friendships). As a result, we compartmentalize our social expression. In a
culturally inhomogeneous society, this kind of deception (in the sense of hiding parts of my personality
depending on the context) is a prerequisite of meaningful freedom.
But on a deeper level: while we may maintain the illusion of a coherent self, we do not possess a single social
persona. Our social identity emerges not only over our personality, but also over the individual relationships in
which it manifests. We become who we are through the reflection of others.
The ethnographer Tricia Wang coined "The Elastic Self' after spending a lot of time with Chinese and
American youth using various forms of social software (...)
The notion of the "Elastic Self' might capture both aspects. On one hand, we may explore different possible
ways of self-actualization by keeping social contexts isolated from each other, on the other, we usually
maintain more than one persona.
How would you build a system that provides a patient with the ability to continue acting deceptively -- in
order to maintain a cohesive identity -- while providing the doctor with the ability to find -- and act on --
perfect information?
The simplest setup: the patient is a BDI (belief, desire, intention) agent, and has accurate knowledge about
himself. He also has beliefs what part about his beliefs, desires and intentions are acceptable to the outside
world (which here is a homogenous hospital context and does not need further differentiation), and which ones
need to be adapted to fit the actual intentions. For perfect information, the doctor gets direct access to both
layers.
The BDI model of agency (i.e. the idea of describing an agent using a set of beliefs, desires and intentions) is a
somewhat crude simplification. We may well hold different, contradictory sets of beliefs and goals at different
levels, and the one that becomes relevant depends on the context, and the state the agent is in. Also, many
beliefs and intentions are not directly represented, but generated when needed, and their content and form may
EFTA00975405
be highly dependent on the interaction. In reality, there is often no perfect information for the doctor to act
upon, e.g., because some of the information will be generated during and depending on the actions of the
doctor.
We might want to skip that kind of accuracy if we just want to get an idea of the benefits of deception for the
organization. If we treat the patients (as well as doctors, nurses, ...) as straightforward BDI agents, the "perfect
information" would be the set of beliefs and desires that the patient functionally acts upon. If we want to
include self-deception, we might simply add another layer on top of that: the set of beliefs that the agent has
about his own beliefs, desires and intentions at any given time. For functionally accurate deception of others,
the patient needs to represent beliefs about the actual beliefs of the doctor, and actionable desired beliefs of the
doctor about the beliefs, desires and intentions of the patient himself. (A perfectly clairvoyant doctor would
have access to all belief layers of the patient, and the relationships between them.) Only if we want to assess
the benefits of deception to the agent himself do we need to implement a more detailed cognitive model.
Cheers,
Joscha

Also here is the link to the book they are talking about

dn720006.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-folly-of-fools-the-logic-of-deceit-and-self-deception-in-human-life/The%20folly%20of%20fools%20_%20the%20logic%20of%20deceit%20and%20self-deception%20in%20human%20life%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf