apnews.com/aec7beb03e9e0e0e6e3c58111293e0ea

So Tara Reade’s evidence now amounts to “maybe there’s a report where I said I was uncomfortable”.

Big if true.

Bro, I'm tired of this s***.

It's so dumb, this women is not credible. I've been trying to be respectful but I refuse to be out here looking like some ape who slanders what may be a victim of abuse.

It's just this is getting out of hand

She was blasting sexual harassment all f***ing day.

She is de facto a liar by mere definition.

"Tara:

I actually did come forward in 1993 but not to the press. But I went through protocol and complained.

Katie:

What was your complaint about?

Tara:

Sexual harassment."
web.archive.org/web/20200331050720/https://www.currentaffairs.org/2020/03/tara-reade-tells-her-story

Deadass, this s*** is done. No more, we need to move the f*** on.

lmaoo

You say "lmaoo" because you have a hack mentality.

Who actually believed that she filed a complaint against Biden but no one ever thought to mention it over his entire time in the senate and as VP?

It was a lie before and now even moreso.

AP exclusive literally implies nothing but everyone will run with it because now they get to elect their blue rapist.

You post this link ignoring the main crux of this, being that the complaints would fall within Senate jurisdiction and not within Biden's personal archives hosted at the U of Delaware.

Also crazy how this link mentions "Reade told Insider that while she never filed a complaint about the assault allegations, she complained to supervisors in Biden's office about harassment and being made to feel uncomfortable."
Now its just "I felt uncomfortable"

Also "received the Biden Senatorial Papers as a gift from Vice President Biden. The document related to that gift is a gift agreement. Gift agreements are not public documents.""

So you mean that Biden handed his personal senatorial papers after the Obama vetting process which contained a complaint against him? As a gift?

And you believe this?

Not to mention these articles are from the same Business Insider that put the transcript of their Tara Reade Witness interview behind a paywall which mentioned that Reade talked to a witness prior to the interview and apparently reminded her of the event.

It implies she's lying.

"In recent weeks, Reade told the AP and other news organizations that Biden sexually assaulted her, pushing her against a wall in the basement of a Capitol Hill office building in 1993, groping her and penetrating her with his fingers. She says she was fired from Biden’s office after filing a complaint with the Senate alleging harassment."

"On Friday, Reade said she was referring to having “chickened out” by not filing full harassment or assault allegations against Biden. In multiple interviews with the AP on Friday, Reade insisted she filed an “intake form” at the Senate personnel office, which included her contact information, the office she worked for and some broad details of her issues with Biden."

It's utter cap to act like AP, one of the most skeptical on this case didn't publish this to point out inconsistencies in her story.

It supplies evidence that shows she flat out changed her story.

She has changed her story so much that it is actually difficult to keep the versions straight.

Using bogus rape claims and exploiting actual sexual assault victims to attack a political opponent: the real horseshoe theory

Fr, I said nothing when she changed her reasons from being fired to leaving cuz of American imperialism to an abusive husband.

I'm deadass getting tired of this s*** and the Kav comparisons. Ford isn't an instrument of projection to be used for political battles like she was in the hearing and is being used now.

This s*** is disgusting, I have stayed silent on this s*** out of fairness to victims of sexual abuse as to not prime or cause a re occurrence of their past trauma but this s*** is too f***ing much.

The Kav comparison was lame to begin with. The controversy with Ford’s claims was that the GOP was trying to force his appointment through without even acknowledging the accusations, and they actively tried to interfere with investigating the claims.

Like I can deadass go hard on this s***

And how did I know this complaint didn't exist?
Because prior she was doing the same s***

Like the f*** is this story? This is the type of s*** to just make me vote green, at least their f*** s*** is about qualified and non qualified candidates. I shouldn't have to be situated like "Is this women lying, are journalist coaching witnesses, did Biden rape her, did everyone who endorsed Biden fail if he did rape her, was Obama's vetting process skewed".

Like tf is this s*** lmao. I feel like I'm in an Ayn Rand book

Yeah, the GOP just straight up ignored her and Kav literally blamed a cabal of Clinton and Democrat elites on propping up her allegation when Ford wanted to stay anonymous in the first place.

Contrary to Tara "tic toc" Reade

Not to mention Ford had a straight up therapist note from 2k12 about bumfuck Kav when none one else would know who the f*** he was. I doubt someone engineered a story about how in high school Kav and her friend, Mark Judge, accused of literally taking turns f***ing drunk girls by an ex girlfriend, almost raped her at a drunk high school party. (Not to mention, why would she even mention MARK "Women sometimes don't say what they mean" JUDGE if she was lying)
Then took it to her therapist in couple's counseling.
Now could Kav be innocent? Sure, but this is a job interview and it really sounds like he probably f***ing did it.

These cases aren't even remotely the same.

"Why didn't she make this claim when I say she should have made it "

OH another tweet

Anyways Biden has been a creep for years.

Did I even say that you stupid idiot?

I'm talking about a complaint, as in a filed f***ing senatorial complaint you knuckle dragging moron.

The subject of our very f***ing conversation.

This is the type of anger that can only be espoused when you know your candidate is a creepy sexual predator and now you've gotta defend him

Yikes, instead of apologizing for a mistake, you're going to attack me and attribute Biden as "my candidate" because I'm defending him.

Good to see you are indeed a partisan hack. Maybe, you can apologize for accusing someone of dismaying alleged victims of sexual assault based on when they confide to the public and then trying to gaslight them when they knowingly get upset.

Cuz its not like Lil'Synopsis didn't actually read my post properly and went for one of his cute prepared one liners to a post about filing a literal document to the senate as opposed to one talking about verbal complaints to the public.

Not until you apologize for defending a sexual creep such as Biden.

Synopsis’ corny ass really thinks he can still try and shame this into existence

What is this random "No u" retort. Biden is a creep, it doesn't mean he digitally penetrated this individual.

Biden being a handsy old guy who points fingers at protesters, sniffs hair or w.e that weird s*** is, doesn't necessarily mean he is guilty of whatever random accusation is made of him.
Now you can feel free to think Biden did it, this is like Kav, a job interview of sorts and the court of public opinion.

However, you are replying to me with some f***ing garbage and then trying to insult me for being upset. Have some self awareness

I don't even dislike Synopsis. That's my problem.

He's free to feel that way about Biden's creepy hand magic tricks of 80s inappropriate touching and modern respectful time workplace harassment.

The accusation of him fingering someone is a cap

And of the recent allegation or sexual harassment against a 14 year old?