Hard to see a road to victory for anyone else if Sanders wins both California and Texas
Hard to see anyone other than Bernie really having a legitimate pathway to a MAJORITY of delegates at the moment period.
Sadly however, it's very much so also a possibility still that even Bernie doesn't reach a majority and only gets a plurality (which would force a contested convention).
Y'all see the new WPA Intelligence poll released this morning showing Bernie up 7 in Nevada though?
How are people really spreading this crazy BS?? There's literally no one in the race remotely CLOSE to Bernie being pro-union
How are people really spreading this crazy BS?? There's literally no one in the race remotely CLOSE to Bernie being pro-union
He literally has the most union endorsements of any candidate and is the strongest on fair trade
Well yeah, states are weighted differently. I do think there is issues with the weighting of states.
I’m saying a lot of peoples defense of the electoral college is that popular votes would mean only states like California and Texas decide elections. But it is possible to lose more states yet still get the electoral college, so we might as well just make the elections decided by the popular vote
Polls dont matter when the dnc exists
Caucus’s are gonna be weird again because Bernie will probs get majority but he has to win enough delegates
Hard to see anyone other than Bernie really having a legitimate pathway to a MAJORITY of delegates at the moment period.
Sadly however, it's very much so also a possibility still that even Bernie doesn't reach a majority and only gets a plurality (which would force a contested convention).
Biggest risk right now is that if centrists start dropping out and they all fall behind one candidate
Crazy new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggests that the prevailing orthodoxy of the primary so far that many, myself very much included, have subscribed to-- that Bernie, head to head against only one other candidate who unifies the anti-Bernie vote, would get creamed-- might actually be bogus. Particularly if the other candidate was Bloomberg, Buttigieg or Klobuchar, he might actually get STRONGER. Take a look, y'all:
Crazy new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggests that the prevailing orthodoxy of the primary so far that many, myself very much included, have subscribed to-- that Bernie, head to head against only one other candidate who unifies the anti-Bernie vote, would get creamed-- might actually be bogus. Particularly if the other candidate was Bloomberg, Buttigieg or Klobuchar, he might actually get STRONGER. Take a look, y'all:
https://news.yahoo.com/new-yahoo-news-you-gov-poll-shows-sanderss-strength-going-head-to-head-with-rivals-181522968.html
the man is winning, of course that's bogus lmao
we literally had a tight dem race in 2016 in terms of popular vote, sanders vs THE ONE establishment candidate
now that sanders is even stronger why the f*** people would think he would lose 1on1 vs an establishment candidate?
stay off MSM asap
the man is winning, of course that's bogus lmao
we literally had a tight dem race in 2016 in terms of popular vote, sanders vs THE ONE establishment candidate
now that sanders is even stronger why the f*** people would think he would lose 1on1 vs an establishment candidate?
stay off MSM asap
2016 wasn't really tight at all, Hillary blew him out in most states she won. But I see your point. I guess I was so focused on Bernie's apparent ceiling I overestimated Bloomberg's (never thought Klobuchar or Buttigieg was a serious contender). Interesting that Warren is the closest to him here. Guess her dropping out would be a good thing after all.
Crazy how 4-5 months ago Bernie was in 3rd or 4th place in most polls
When he had the heart attack I thought that would take him out of the race.
But he only came back stronger
Crazy new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggests that the prevailing orthodoxy of the primary so far that many, myself very much included, have subscribed to-- that Bernie, head to head against only one other candidate who unifies the anti-Bernie vote, would get creamed-- might actually be bogus. Particularly if the other candidate was Bloomberg, Buttigieg or Klobuchar, he might actually get STRONGER. Take a look, y'all:
https://news.yahoo.com/new-yahoo-news-you-gov-poll-shows-sanderss-strength-going-head-to-head-with-rivals-181522968.html
“Yeah well this doesn’t matter because if you add up the percentages of who voted for moderates then they beat Bernie”
“Dozens of accusers emerge after Andrew Yang's wife reveals sexual assault“
cnn.com/2020/02/14/politics/evelyn-yang-doctor-sexual-assault-accusers-invs/index.html
Lmao... this is the most maliciously misleading headline that I’ve seen in a while.
“Dozens of accusers emerge after Andrew Yang's wife reveals sexual assault“
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/14/politics/evelyn-yang-doctor-sexual-assault-accusers-invs/index.html
Lmao... this is the most maliciously misleading headline that I’ve seen in a while.
yo what
they knew what they was doing
“Dozens of accusers emerge after Andrew Yang's wife reveals sexual assault“
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/14/politics/evelyn-yang-doctor-sexual-assault-accusers-invs/index.html
Lmao... this is the most maliciously misleading headline that I’ve seen in a while.
Jesus that’s f***ed up
yo what
they knew what they was doing
The story is barely about Yang’s wife, too
Like the my shoehorned her in there just for the headline
Crazy new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggests that the prevailing orthodoxy of the primary so far that many, myself very much included, have subscribed to-- that Bernie, head to head against only one other candidate who unifies the anti-Bernie vote, would get creamed-- might actually be bogus. Particularly if the other candidate was Bloomberg, Buttigieg or Klobuchar, he might actually get STRONGER. Take a look, y'all:
https://news.yahoo.com/new-yahoo-news-you-gov-poll-shows-sanderss-strength-going-head-to-head-with-rivals-181522968.html
This is only true in a vacuum though, no? Since the nominee is still decided on a plurality rather than simple majority, even if a popular is "more" popular in a generalized sense doesn't mean they're also stronger in the plurality since regional and demographic popularity individually matters more than overall collective popularity.
How likely is it that the Senate flips to a democratic majority this year?
Highly unlikely regardless of nom