Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    edited
    Pusha P

    This is a fallacy.

    His policies would benefit everyone, not just the youth.

    To not turn out and vote for him, regardless of who you are, says more about the average voter than anything.

    This isn’t a fallacy at all, and it isn’t even a statement about who his policies would affect. This is literally the response people had to Biden doing well in early polls.

    The idea was that Bernie would defy conventional wisdom in a lot of districts.

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Younger turnout surpassed older turnout in 2018.

    Am a poli sci major. I spend 90% of my time around ppl who actually care. A lot of them have no f***ing clue what a primary is or when to vote or the voting rules

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    I don’t think this is really fair tbh... I honestly think ego was a big part of her staying in. On paper, Warren is a pretty ideal candidate if you are talking about bridging moderates and progressives, she just ran her campaign like a coward.

    Warren has been a proponent of progressive politics and economic reform, she just isn’t Bernie. Calling Warren an enemy of progressives is really just trying to redefine progressive politics in the US.

    even if it was pure ego driving her rather than larger political machinations, how is that any better?
    and isnt redefining progressive politics the entire goal?

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    even if it was pure ego driving her rather than larger political machinations, how is that any better?
    and isnt redefining progressive politics the entire goal?

    It isn’t necessarily better at all. It just makes a lot more sense than some conspiracy to hurt Bernie.

    That may be your goal, but it is still disingenuous to turn around and say that Warren has been working against progressive ideals.

  • Mar 5, 2020
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    dont you think that sooner or later that situation will become untenable? if they are truly this impotent and unable to exert any real power, their days of relevance are numbered. a few hundred thousand suburban boomers who have had their brains melted by msnbc are hardly a constituency

    edit: only a coward deletes

    I wasn’t afraid of the post. I deleted it because I didn’t like the time I posted it. FOR ALL YOU NIGGAS READING THIS IF YOU EVER SEE ME DELETE A POST ITS NOT BECAUSE I REGRET POSTING IT ITS BECAUSE OF SOME OTHER S***
    why do you think I just be answering people when they ask what people are responding to

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Durkio World

    turnout in general increased this year. More people are actually paying attention. If Bernie couldn't start doing this with more serious voters like warren could, there's no way he could do it during the general.

    Not to mention when more people hear he wants to raise taxes on everyone, they will avoid him at all costs. No presidential candidate can win in the U.S. when they openly advocate for raising taxes on everyone no matter what you claim to pay for

    F*** it, then. We can all live with the corporate elites arms up our asses.

    I been prepped for this reality since grade school.

    I just saw a light of hope, but at this point it seems things have already taken off with no chance of coming back.

  • Buckleys Angel

    It isn’t necessarily better at all. It just makes a lot more sense than some conspiracy to hurt Bernie.

    That may be your goal, but it is still disingenuous to turn around and say that Warren has been working against progressive ideals.

    the problem is "progressive ideals" can be whatever the hell she says they are. those words don't really mean anything.
    and while i think shes pretty dumb, i dont think shes dumb enough to not recognize the damage her campaign did to not just sanders but to any vaguely left-of-center politics. the powers that be in the party obviously saw it too. the whole conspiracy vs ego thing is a distinction without a difference

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    dont you think that sooner or later that situation will become untenable? if they are truly this impotent and unable to exert any real power, their days of relevance are numbered. a few hundred thousand suburban boomers who have had their brains melted by msnbc are hardly a constituency

    edit: only a coward deletes

    And to answer your question, The youth or “woke” vote is the one that’s barely a constituency. The only people who actually get up and vote appear to be people who don’t want to fundamentally change the system. If everything’s trump and bush did hasn’t mobilized the youth to actually participate, then not much else can

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    posting this 4 times is a serious power move and i respect the hell out of it

  • Mar 5, 2020
    Synopsis

    Younger turnout surpassed older turnout in 2018.

    Am a poli sci major. I spend 90% of my time around ppl who actually care. A lot of them have no f***ing clue what a primary is or when to vote or the voting rules

    What % of that is KTT s***posters

  • Mar 5, 2020
    Pusha P

    F*** it, then. We can all live with the corporate elites arms up our asses.

    I been prepped for this reality since grade school.

    I just saw a light of hope, but at this point it seems things have already taken off with no chance of coming back.

    bro that’s not true at all yet please don’t let bullshit get to you 😂

    only FOURTY percent “done” (all the ST votes ain’t even been tallied yet) and there are debates coming up

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    "he was the frontrunner before anyone voted" is not a terribly convincing argument. he was polling high based off name recognition but that doesnt mean anything in an actual election

    You said he had no chance at winning. He was the front runner the entire campaign cycle. Then when his vote stopped being split so many ways, he returned to the front runner spot.

    I’m not even sure what we’re arguing here anymore lmao. End of the day, Bernie benefitted from having the vote split so many ways, and now that it’s a head to head he’s not going to win.

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Enpax

    And to answer your question, The youth or “woke” vote is the one that’s barely a constituency. The only people who actually get up and vote appear to be people who don’t want to fundamentally change the system. If everything’s trump and bush did hasn’t mobilized the youth to actually participate, then not much else can

    generally i think its a bad idea to view politics in generational terms rather than class terms or other more material ways but theres no getting around how bad youth turnout is

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    edited
    Theory

    You said he had no chance at winning. He was the front runner the entire campaign cycle. Then when his vote stopped being split so many ways, he returned to the front runner spot.

    I’m not even sure what we’re arguing here anymore lmao. End of the day, Bernie benefitted from having the vote split so many ways, and now that it’s a head to head he’s not going to win.

    my only point was that party leaders and donors clearly picked joe as the golden boy and had the others drop out. you can say it was inevitable (and i would probly be inclined to agree) but theres no denying it was a coordinated move.
    i aint arguing. just tryin to shoot the s*** with my friends on ktt2.com

  • neon 🍄
    Mar 5, 2020

    imagine how senile Joe is going to look against just Bernie on stage

  • Mar 5, 2020

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    generally i think its a bad idea to view politics in generational terms rather than class terms or other more material ways but theres no getting around how bad youth turnout is

    Even among the working class biden is still winning. California isn’t the norm

  • Mar 5, 2020
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    posting this 4 times is a serious power move and i respect the hell out of it

    It’s been like 8 times sometimes

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Enpax

    Even among the working class biden is still winning. California isn’t the norm

    among the working class, nobody is winning because most of them dont vote. And why would they? electoral politics havent done s*** for them historically
    if youre someone who believes in electoralism (and i am not), it seems obvious that you would try to turn out that massive bloc no one has been able to mobilize

  • lmao

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    among the working class, nobody is winning because most of them dont vote. And why would they? electoral politics havent done s*** for them historically
    if youre someone who believes in electoralism (and i am not), it seems obvious that you would try to turn out that massive bloc no one has been able to mobilize

    Worker participation in the early 19th century led to real gains in conditions. If working people aren’t voting then it’s because they don’t really care. And the “working” class may well be a minority at this point

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply

    why are warren supporters mad that people are calling them out on their fake progressivism

  • Mar 5, 2020
    ·
    3 replies

    I still don't trust Warren as VP. She has no integrity whatsoever.

  • fendi

    why are warren supporters mad that people are calling them out on their fake progressivism

    they would rather set themselves on fire than admit their politics are purely aesthetic and that they dont really care about any of the real world implications

  • JaeRell

    I still don't trust Warren as VP. She has no integrity whatsoever.

    i really cannot say enough how warren as VP literally benefits Bernie in no way. she would do him harm, in fact

Thread was locked by
a moderator