Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Mar 6, 2020

    😩🙌🙌bernie please ram your cock in bidens bussy gogogo dont hold back berns

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Undecided

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primary-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

    wtf does “no one” mean?

  • Mar 6, 2020
    DickerSpaniel

    wtf does “no one” mean?

    That means they just give Trump democratic nominee? :dno:

  • Mar 6, 2020
    Undecided

    FiveThirtyEight update:

    Nate Bronze strikes again

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    nate silver was right about 1 layup election in 2012 and now we all gotta pretend hes not full of s***

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    @Undecided lmao i think this is just in the event none of them clear the that needed threshold and it’s a contested convention, so idk if that’s just smart betting or we can consider that bloc to largely favor sanders

    either way that and the other graph aren’t that damning imo since they are almost entirely projection and it’s not like biden and bernie have been neck and neck prior, i’m sure biden’s projections didn’t seem the best at the time he was struggling

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    DickerSpaniel

    @Undecided lmao i think this is just in the event none of them clear the that needed threshold and it’s a contested convention, so idk if that’s just smart betting or we can consider that bloc to largely favor sanders

    either way that and the other graph aren’t that damning imo since they are almost entirely projection and it’s not like biden and bernie have been neck and neck prior, i’m sure biden’s projections didn’t seem the best at the time he was struggling

    You can scroll back to before South Carolina where Bernie had a 50% chance and Biden was like at 10%.

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ragedsycokiller

    What "fascist" tactics are you referring to then? That's usually the only complaint I've seen about them being violent

    @gabapentin already nailed it. im not saying violence/fighting is exclusive to fascists. using violence to unlawfully silence and intimidate others in the name of ideology is.

  • Mar 6, 2020
    DickerSpaniel

    wtf does “no one” mean?

    it's just the odds that neither of them get the majority

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    nate silver was right about 1 layup election in 2012 and now we all gotta pretend hes not full of s***

    nate silver is a dweeb of the highest degree but what he does has nothing to do with political a***ysis. it's all just math based statistics that he bases off of available data

    he gets s*** for giving Trump a 30% chance at winning in, but all that means is if you held that election 100 times, T wins 30 of him. Because he did win doesnt make him "wrong"

    I agree though, he got one election spot on and then people started sucking him off. The problem is, those same people dont understand probability take this s*** as gospel instead

  • Mar 6, 2020
    Undecided

    You can scroll back to before South Carolina where Bernie had a 50% chance and Biden was like at 10%.

    i mean idrk betting like that but seems to be expected, it’s all about just shifting projections based upon how the public “seems” to respond, which is largely first displayed through news and media, but the public does not always necessarily respond accordingly, which is when it gets shifted again, and we are currently within that waiting period.

    i’m genuinely interested to see how betting projections (and results) have been for the last few notable campaigns ie obama/hillary, bernie/hillary, trump/republican primary, hillary/trump etc

  • Nate Silver needs to make like his hairline and disappear.
    Can't believe he's still relevant after how horribly he fumbled the 2016 election every step of the race.

  • Ochocinco

    nate silver is a dweeb of the highest degree but what he does has nothing to do with political a***ysis. it's all just math based statistics that he bases off of available data

    he gets s*** for giving Trump a 30% chance at winning in, but all that means is if you held that election 100 times, T wins 30 of him. Because he did win doesnt make him "wrong"

    I agree though, he got one election spot on and then people started sucking him off. The problem is, those same people dont understand probability take this s*** as gospel instead

    also every time he opens his mouth to say something other than numbers-wonk-shit its always insufferable drivel

  • Mar 6, 2020
    fendi

    I can't stop laughing at this account making fun of biden's dementia

    https://twitter.com/biden4pres/status/1235364733152374785

    "full of beans" lmfaoooo

  • Ochocinco

    nate silver is a dweeb of the highest degree but what he does has nothing to do with political a***ysis. it's all just math based statistics that he bases off of available data

    he gets s*** for giving Trump a 30% chance at winning in, but all that means is if you held that election 100 times, T wins 30 of him. Because he did win doesnt make him "wrong"

    I agree though, he got one election spot on and then people started sucking him off. The problem is, those same people dont understand probability take this s*** as gospel instead

    It always cracks me up when people bring up 2016 Trump numbers.

    Yeah... they did predict Trump had a very small chance. The guy got 3,000,000 fewer votes and scraped by in one of the most unusual corner cases in the history of our elections.

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    saw it coming but still disappointing

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    Lmao everybody ITT mad as hell at Nate Silver

    Y’all should just start hyping Bernie up to run 3rd party and meme it into existence cause he isn’t getting the nomination

  • Mar 6, 2020
    WhiteChrxsDorner
    https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1236027279131762696

    saw it coming but still disappointing

    boooooooo

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Theory

    Lmao everybody ITT mad as hell at Nate Silver

    Y’all should just start hyping Bernie up to run 3rd party and meme it into existence cause he isn’t getting the nomination

    nobody is mad at nate silver lol

  • neon 🍄
    Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    edited
    Theory

    Lmao everybody ITT mad as hell at Nate Silver

    Y’all should just start hyping Bernie up to run 3rd party and meme it into existence cause he isn’t getting the nomination

    don't think anyone is fuming at nate

    he legit has had some terrible takes tho

    fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-is-winning-the-polls-and-losing-the-nomination

    like when he told everyone trump wouldn't win the gop nom

    the 538 site does seem correct though with how everything is shifting at the moment

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    WhiteChrxsDorner

    nobody is mad at nate silver lol

    There’s multiple posts on this page s***ting on him lol

  • Mar 6, 2020

    We just absolutely cannot have a president named “joe” wtf kinda name

  • WhiteChrxsDorner
    https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1236027279131762696

    saw it coming but still disappointing

    lmao, of course

  • Mar 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Theory

    There’s multiple posts on this page s***ting on him lol

    whats ur point? hes easy to s*** on

  • bernie presidency so so soon

Thread was locked by
a moderator