I would piss on and eat your body too ngl
Not sure how this is relevant to the argument but alright I guess
Just ignore them. Typical speciesm mindset with no scientific reasoning to back up the nonsense, regardless it’s sad that all lives involved were lost.
iflscience.com/will-my-dog-eat-me-if-i-die-evidence-points-to-yes-63028
nationalgeographic.co.uk/animals/would-your-dog-eat-you-if-you-died-get-the-facts/amp
No scientific evidence? Numerous studies cited in both articles.
Maybe the animals that you worship aren’t as “innocent” as you think, at least a human would have the “decency” to bury you.
Do they normally blur out crime scene locations on Google Maps?
The house where it happened is completely covered up when you search it up
Yeah. A lady went missing and was presumably murdered in my neighborhood after they arrested her husband and their whole house got blurred.
“Suspect was identified through DNA using genealogy databases, police say”
abcnews.go.com/US/idaho-murders-suspect-identified-dna-genealogy-databases-police/story?id=96088596
https://www.iflscience.com/will-my-dog-eat-me-if-i-die-evidence-points-to-yes-63028
https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/animals/would-your-dog-eat-you-if-you-died-get-the-facts/amp
No scientific evidence? Numerous studies cited in both articles.
Maybe the animals that you worship aren’t as “innocent” as you think, at least a human would have the “decency” to bury you.
An animal eating a food source doesn’t make it evil, “evil” and “morals” are human-centric traits we apply to animals through anthropomorphising them, no dog does anything to be nefarious or evil- they do perform biological functions; humans on the other hand are capable of voluntary abhorrent acts. I’ve got a masters in animal biology and conservation and currently studying a PhD but thanks for sharing links that explain basic biology to me playa. Just say you think humans are better than animals and keep it moving
I'm honestly surprised there aren't more serial killers like this who get inspired by movies
“Suspect was identified through DNA using genealogy databases, police say”
https://abcnews.go.com/US/idaho-murders-suspect-identified-dna-genealogy-databases-police/story?id=96088596
Ayo?
An animal eating a food source doesn’t make it evil, “evil” and “morals” are human-centric traits we apply to animals through anthropomorphising them, no dog does anything to be nefarious or evil- they do perform biological functions; humans on the other hand are capable of voluntary abhorrent acts. I’ve got a masters in animal biology and conservation and currently studying a PhD but thanks for sharing links that explain basic biology to me playa. Just say you think humans are better than animals and keep it moving
Then why should animal's lack of morality altogether be better than what humans do? They are not capable of morals so why give them credit for "not being worse than humans"?
I'm honestly surprised there aren't more serial killers like this who get inspired by movies
Copycat killers . Serial killers don’t get inspired to kill from movies. All that s*** starts from when their young and tiger upbringing
Dunno why people are clowning you at all; I’d save a dog over a random human any day, dogs are always innocent where as humans are inherently capable of and likely to be evil pieces of s*** at some point. You are correct ignore these bozos.
With your own reasoning they are merely innocent bc they are too stupid biologically to form thought processes complex enough to be considered guilt. So why should we give a damn about their innocence if that is all they are capable of?
Copycat killers . Serial killers don’t get inspired to kill from movies. All that s*** starts from when their young and tiger upbringing
I don't mean being inspired to kill obviously but the way they kill in the movies
An animal eating a food source doesn’t make it evil, “evil” and “morals” are human-centric traits we apply to animals through anthropomorphising them, no dog does anything to be nefarious or evil- they do perform biological functions; humans on the other hand are capable of voluntary abhorrent acts. I’ve got a masters in animal biology and conservation and currently studying a PhD but thanks for sharing links that explain basic biology to me playa. Just say you think humans are better than animals and keep it moving
Ok
Humans are better than animals, and it’s not even close either
And you claim I’m anthropomorphizing dogs by applying “morals” to them, when you and the other morons with you have been calling them “innocent” this whole thread. Do you not see the irony? Or are you dumb as rocks like the other guy?
If you were tied to a train track next to a dog I would save the dog and use the leftover time to take it for a walk
I know u in a bad place right now RONALDO GOAT
An animal eating a food source doesn’t make it evil, “evil” and “morals” are human-centric traits we apply to animals through anthropomorphising them, no dog does anything to be nefarious or evil- they do perform biological functions; humans on the other hand are capable of voluntary abhorrent acts. I’ve got a masters in animal biology and conservation and currently studying a PhD but thanks for sharing links that explain basic biology to me playa. Just say you think humans are better than animals and keep it moving
Also, notice how bro moved the goalpost. First it was “he’s lying dogs don’t do that” now it’s “you can’t blame them it’s a biological function”
Dunno why people are clowning you at all; I’d save a dog over a random human any day, dogs are always innocent where as humans are inherently capable of and likely to be evil pieces of s*** at some point. You are correct ignore these bozos.
Dumbass
I'm honestly surprised there aren't more serial killers like this who get inspired by movies
I know u in a bad place right now RONALDO GOAT
I’ve come to terms with the Al Nassr move. It is what it is
Dead asf that niggas turned into philosophers itt arguing the ethics and morals of saving a dog over a person and vice versa when 4 mfs got murked