loser is one of the worst terms to enter our vocabulary
It’s been so overused it’s starting to lose its meaning
It’s been so overused it’s starting to lose its meaning
The meaning is literally spelled out involuntary celibate yet people have just adapted the term to mean “loser” as if they aren’t some of the most toxic people on the internet. It’s so annoying
People like this are the reason the internet needs to have more regulations and laws put in place. S*** is like the wild wild west now.
Been the Wild West basically since inception
Wanna see the ktt version of that.
i understand trolling when it’s funny and you’ll make up a funny post, but i don’t get it in this context
loser is one of the worst terms to enter our vocabulary
Facts but what else would we call these type of human beings
I love this, but however much I despise his culture I respect his speech, he's well spoken
I disagree. It used to be the wild west, now it's much more regulated. Which is a dangerous because it gives governments the mean to instigate and astroturf seemingly organic movements, then they use the media they own to cover it and control a narrative. Then they use that s*** to justify legislative decisions.
That's how they do it in France at least
trying to fit in on an anonymous forum.. it needs to be way more psychological studies on this kind of s***.
People like this are the reason the internet needs to have more regulations and laws put in place. S*** is like the wild wild west now.
nah, it's the exact opposite, that's the problem. these people didn't start existing yesteday. the internet used to be the wild west, you never heard about people like this because they sat in their isolated chat rooms and forums. now the internet isn't some wild west gun blazing territory though - like the entire internet is owned by like 6 companies basically and information spreads faster than anything because of media cycles and centralized social media. there's no such thing as an internet circle or community existing in isolation anymore and that's what's resulted in all of this s***
I disagree. It used to be the wild west, now it's much more regulated. Which is a dangerous because it gives governments the mean to instigate and astroturf seemingly organic movements, then they use the media they own to cover it and control a narrative. Then they use that s*** to justify legislative decisions.
That's how they do it in France at least
If it was more regulated buzz-words like "loser" and "alt-right" wouldn't have become a real thing. I'm all for an authoritarian internet, there is so much s*** going on online and it's becoming a false-reality because people can't seperate it from digital to real life. Seriously. I fear for the future.
nah, it's the exact opposite, that's the problem. these people didn't start existing yesteday. the internet used to be the wild west, you never heard about people like this because they sat in their isolated chat rooms and forums. now the internet isn't some wild west gun blazing territory though - like the entire internet is owned by like 6 companies basically and information spreads faster than anything because of media cycles and centralized social media. there's no such thing as an internet circle or community existing in isolation anymore and that's what's resulted in all of this s***
So people are shooting up schools because the internet isn't as clandestine as it was before???
So people are shooting up schools because the internet isn't as clandestine as it was before???
yeah, literally. also anti-depressants being overprescribed to kids but thats a different story
also the first modern school shooting was in 1979 so its not like school shootings were an internet invention