Reply
  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Shockwave

    lol I didn’t think they were gonna take action, I already pulled the songs and Spotify wasn’t the only service I used. L for the people who had their songs removed

    I wonder if they’ve taken steps addressed the copyright infringement epidemic - unofficial remixes, leaks under fake names and the like. I sure hope they don’t, that means a lot of chopped up remixes are being taken down

    Just saw your edit. The copyright infringement issue is on the copyright owner. They have to be aware about it and then alert the distributor of those song(s) to take them down and give them the profits earned. Also Spotify/streaming platform isn't the ones who are liable in this situation, all the liability is on the music distributor (tunecore, distrokid, onerpm, amuse, cdbaby etc) and artist who released a song with copyright material.

    This s*** happened to me, I posted a beat and then someone used it and released it on all music streaming platforms without buying a lease. It racked up some decent streams and the guy wasn't responding to my emails.

    I then contacted their distributor and told them they didn't have the rights to use that beat so they were infringing on copyright and they took it down from everywhere and sent me the profits earned from that song. Was really easy tbh.

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    VeggieKubernetes

    I was actually more curious about the granular breakdown of cost of hosting and content transfer in the cloud on Google cloud platform and how scalable it is for that kind of service

    I used to use intricately.com but I don’t have a business account for that anymore.

    I’ll loook up those statements tho and see what I can dig up, thanks

    Yea got the 10k infront of me rn and they just don't breakdown the cost more. Although if you go to the section where they describe each term you gonna have more detail.

    So if you go to the IR on Spotify, look at the 2020 AR, go to page F-12 you can see what they define as a cost of good.

    Pretty much what we said, royalties and server costs.

    Too bad companies don't like to breakdown their costs unless is in their favor.

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    etant

    Yea got the 10k infront of me rn and they just don't breakdown the cost more. Although if you go to the section where they describe each term you gonna have more detail.

    So if you go to the IR on Spotify, look at the 2020 AR, go to page F-12 you can see what they define as a cost of good.

    Pretty much what we said, royalties and server costs.

    Too bad companies don't like to breakdown their costs unless is in their favor.

    Sweet thanks fam

    Now I can see if they cook the books like nba teams do to underpay players 👀

  • Apr 16, 2021
    VeggieKubernetes

    Sweet thanks fam

    Now I can see if they cook the books like nba teams do to underpay players 👀

    Hahaha their s*** is audited by the big 4, it's so f***ing hard to actually understand if they are saying some f*** s*** straight to your face.

    Oh btw it's cost of revenue not cost of good, if you trying to ctrl f.

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    TIIMMY BURNER

    So let me get this straight, a business should slash spending on what could help them make money (promo) and should instead pay people more. I see why you aren't a CEO anywhere.

    Id be the peoples CEO

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    we ain't making that much lmaoooo

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Yung Dagger D

    Just saw your edit. The copyright infringement issue is on the copyright owner. They have to be aware about it and then alert the distributor of those song(s) to take them down and give them the profits earned. Also Spotify/streaming platform isn't the ones who are liable in this situation, all the liability is on the music distributor (tunecore, distrokid, onerpm, amuse, cdbaby etc) and artist who released a song with copyright material.

    This s*** happened to me, I posted a beat and then someone used it and released it on all music streaming platforms without buying a lease. It racked up some decent streams and the guy wasn't responding to my emails.

    I then contacted their distributor and told them they didn't have the rights to use that beat so they were infringing on copyright and they took it down from everywhere and sent me the profits earned from that song. Was really easy tbh.

    That’s interesting, how do you find out how distributed the songs? Because as you know those services allow you to choose a label name.

    Someone who was distributed under some independent label (via Empire) took my homies beat, they tried contacting the a&r/executive of that label but he left them on read.

  • Apr 16, 2021

    That's actually fantastic.

  • Kenig 💭
    Apr 16, 2021

    Apple Music is objectively better than spotify

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Chris Crack

    we ain't making that much lmaoooo

    I gotta check out one of your albums, I’ve seen the name but I’m not familiar with your tunes

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Swope

    Id be the peoples CEO

    ***Bankrupt

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    TIIMMY BURNER

    ***Bankrupt

    Don't care we up

  • Apr 16, 2021

    It is important to note that Spotify runs a massive ad-supported music service with very different economics to the paid Spotify Premium tier, while Apple Music only offers a paid service.

    is the article in op suggesting all of the artists get a part of Spotify’s ad revenue ?

  • Apr 16, 2021
    Swope

    Don't care we up

    If you bankrupt your company then how would you be able to keep paying the artists? You'd be a lot like movie pass, the people's champ for a couple months.

  • Apr 16, 2021
    VeggieKubernetes

    Fair is relative to total income and operational expenditure.

    I know Spotify made an announcement that they would be leveraging the GCP and at that scale, it ain’t exactly cheap.

    I’d have to see a complete breakdown of costs tbh, and given that streaming has historically been a losing venture, I doubt it would do much for the artists

    You really are wasting your time talking sense to that guy, many have tried

  • Apr 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Swope

    ok and

    Lmao imagine your company going bankrupt because you have to pay a billion dollars to the girl that made Dance Monkey

  • Apr 16, 2021
    Theory

    Lmao imagine your company going bankrupt because you have to pay a billion dollars to the girl that made Dance Monkey

    05 f*** em

  • Apr 16, 2021
    Shockwave

    That’s interesting, how do you find out how distributed the songs? Because as you know those services allow you to choose a label name.

    Someone who was distributed under some independent label (via Empire) took my homies beat, they tried contacting the a&r/executive of that label but he left them on read.

    I found out the distributor because I got a copyright claim on the beat on Youtube and saw the name. Just upload it on YouTube you'll see who the distributor is once you get the claim.

    Here's an example

    Yeah sometimes the label does ignore and won't act unless you threaten legal action against them but just go straight to the distributor first and try getting them to take it down.

  • Apr 16, 2021

    That's good money down the line for up and coming artists, sorry

  • Apr 16, 2021
    m FREE PALESTINE x

    imagine if they paid 4 ktt posts 😔

    nigga what?? Imagine posting on KTT and not secretly being sponsored by a rappers team to gas them up on a kanyewest forum

  • Apr 30, 2021
    Shockwave

    I gotta check out one of your albums, I’ve seen the name but I’m not familiar with your tunes

    peep and lmk what u think!