Disney ownership, plus the benefit of being bundled with ESPN and Disney+.
S*** espn too
with the bundle you get one free
cancelling joe pera was the last straw i want dudes head on a plate. why is he f***ing up some of like the only esteemed n unique TV brands left like adult swim n hbo for the sake of f***ing DISCOVERY
In for more content on HBO Max
to think we thought this only meant discovery content on hbo max too...
to think we thought this only meant discovery content on hbo max too...
My post aged terribly smh
Thor got 4 movies out.
Like the movies or not MCU is ran very good compared to anything really(in terms of putting out content)
cancelling joe pera was the last straw i want dudes head on a plate. why is he f***ing up some of like the only esteemed n unique TV brands left like adult swim n hbo for the sake of f***ing DISCOVERY
Discovery is all reality and cheap as f***
Really good writeup on this
Biggest thing I took from it:
A few months ago, when the Warner Bros Discovery merger happened Deadline quoted an anonymous employee who foresaw the mishigoss hitting the studio now, who knew what was to come for the once proud Warner Bros:
“From an employee that has been with Warner for over 20 years … this really feels like McDonalds has bought a Michelin star restaurant and thinks they know how to run it.”
The others are backed by studios as well. They'll be fine
True. I doubt people even subscribe long term to those. Average person is subscribed to 2-3 streaming services.
Really good writeup on this
https://www.patreon.com/posts/batgirl-and-what-70019421?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=postshare_creator (it's free)
Biggest thing I took from it:
A few months ago, when the Warner Bros Discovery merger happened Deadline quoted an anonymous employee who foresaw the mishigoss hitting the studio now, who knew what was to come for the once proud Warner Bros:
“From an employee that has been with Warner for over 20 years … this really feels like McDonalds has bought a Michelin star restaurant and thinks they know how to run it.”
thanks for sharing this
Is that good? Because I watched Bel Air on Peacock and now it's only there for WWE for me too lmao
I like it a lot haha
It’s only 3 episodes in and it’s starting to pick up
Vacation turned murder mystery show
Aye man listen... WBD looking terrible rn
For a time, according to multiple sources, Warners considered pumping more money into the Batgirl to beef it up into a 2023 theatrical release. Another source downplays the notion a theatrical play was seriously in contention, as from a script stage it was conceived as a streaming play. Either way, when a very early version of the film test screened, with temp VFX and score, it landed a score in the low 60s and is believed to have only tested once. Film producers and executives have long noted test screenings are best used as a gauge for whether audiences are engaged or disengaged at certain parts of the film, not as a final judgement call on a movie. For example, horror films that end up doing well are known for testing in the 60s. Batgirl‘s test score, which was a director’s cut, is comparable to tests for the first It (2017), which wound up grossing $700.3 million globally, as well as an early test for the upcoming Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Both of those films tested in the 60s.
Batgirl had the same test screening score as IT Chapter 1 and Shazam 2.
IT was huge and Shazam is being pumped for theaters so what gives
feel like they also drove off potential film collaborators w this move if I was a director I'm taking my movie to just about any other studio but warner bros
Also
The Batgirl news comes ahead of Warner Bros. Discovery’s earnings call Thursday, with rumors swirling that Warners is considering moving the release dates for two of its upcoming films — Shazam! Fury of the Gods (currently slated for Dec. 21) and Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom (currently set for March 17, 2023). On Wednesday, the studio revealed an October 2024 date for the Joker sequel, Joker: Folie a Deux.
Thor got 4 movies out.
Disney doubling down on Marvel too like their new bread and butter
Aye man listen... WBD looking terrible rn
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1554931713658261504For a time, according to multiple sources, Warners considered pumping more money into the Batgirl to beef it up into a 2023 theatrical release. Another source downplays the notion a theatrical play was seriously in contention, as from a script stage it was conceived as a streaming play. Either way, when a very early version of the film test screened, with temp VFX and score, it landed a score in the low 60s and is believed to have only tested once. Film producers and executives have long noted test screenings are best used as a gauge for whether audiences are engaged or disengaged at certain parts of the film, not as a final judgement call on a movie. For example, horror films that end up doing well are known for testing in the 60s. Batgirl‘s test score, which was a director’s cut, is comparable to tests for the first It (2017), which wound up grossing $700.3 million globally, as well as an early test for the upcoming Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Both of those films tested in the 60s.
Batgirl had the same test screening score as IT Chapter 1 and Shazam 2.
IT was huge and Shazam is being pumped for theaters so what gives
cmon comic book movies and horror films are a terrible comparison
edit: didnt see shazam thing but still
Aye man listen... WBD looking terrible rn
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1554931713658261504For a time, according to multiple sources, Warners considered pumping more money into the Batgirl to beef it up into a 2023 theatrical release. Another source downplays the notion a theatrical play was seriously in contention, as from a script stage it was conceived as a streaming play. Either way, when a very early version of the film test screened, with temp VFX and score, it landed a score in the low 60s and is believed to have only tested once. Film producers and executives have long noted test screenings are best used as a gauge for whether audiences are engaged or disengaged at certain parts of the film, not as a final judgement call on a movie. For example, horror films that end up doing well are known for testing in the 60s. Batgirl‘s test score, which was a director’s cut, is comparable to tests for the first It (2017), which wound up grossing $700.3 million globally, as well as an early test for the upcoming Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Both of those films tested in the 60s.
Batgirl had the same test screening score as IT Chapter 1 and Shazam 2.
IT was huge and Shazam is being pumped for theaters so what gives
dawg they tryna course correct and keep snyderverse canon yall can deny it all u want but its obvious batgirl was going to f*** up the timeline and position keaton as nick fury of dceu zaslav sees more money in cavil and affleck s*** makes perfect sense
shazam 2 doesnt f*** up the timeline
Nolan in the multiverse laughing at this s***
Also
The Batgirl news comes ahead of Warner Bros. Discovery’s earnings call Thursday, with rumors swirling that Warners is considering moving the release dates for two of its upcoming films — Shazam! Fury of the Gods (currently slated for Dec. 21) and Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom (currently set for March 17, 2023). On Wednesday, the studio revealed an October 2024 date for the Joker sequel, Joker: Folie a Deux.
Jokerverse gonna have a trilogy before DCEU Batman and Superman
Amazing Spiderman 2 came out then Holland went on to have 3 movies and like 3 appearances before a Man Of Steel 2
Amazing Spiderman 2 came out then Holland went on to have 3 movies and like 3 appearances before a Man Of Steel 2