I shouldn't laugh but this is essentially their defence
I cant lie I have been laughing at those saying "this is to go viral its tongue and cheek those aren't the court documents " even when Balenciaga like "nah we sorry about the bondage and documents"
People who believe this is conspiratorial, why do you think Balenciaga chose to make it so obvious?
This is barely in the realm of stratagem
They’re laughing at us lol. What the f*** is anyone gonna do about it? Complain on Twitter for a few days- if that.
the teddy bears is the thing with bondage gear right
everything else just looks like jewelry and accessories to me unless im f***ing blind
I cant lie I have been laughing at those saying "this is to go viral its tongue and cheek those aren't the court documents " even when Balenciaga like "nah we sorry about the bondage and documents"
Nah this got me
They’re laughing at us lol. What the f*** is anyone gonna do about it? Complain on Twitter for a few days- if that.
Thank you, I see your point
People who believe this is conspiratorial, why do you think Balenciaga chose to make it so obvious?
This is barely in the realm of stratagem
I mean at this point it becomes who set up the set and the idea of the project. Yes the photographer has photographed children around the world with their toys and adults with guns,but who set up this specific scenes and was like "yeah thats it". Even if you remove a conspiracy level mindset like wtf is the scene for those that think we just tinfoil
the teddy bears is the thing with bondage gear right
everything else just looks like jewelry and accessories to me unless im f***ing blind
the document is just weird as f***, why include that. what was the intention?
The document is not from the same weird child photos
“Still, Lapine builds her case by erroneously linking the images to photos from an entirely separate — again, entirely separate — campaign promoting Balenciaga's collaboration with adidas.”
Following on from your comment above: it seems like a focus on the juxtaposition between childhood innocence and modern life?
If you remove the bondage bear
isn't helping that the photographer retweeted this terrible article comparison
chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2022/6/7/23152759/gun-restrictions-rights-second-amendment-mass-school-shootings-violence-child-porn-pornography
and yes I read the article and get its supposed to be a shocking title that brings people in
isn't helping that the photographer retweeted this terrible article comparison
https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2022/6/7/23152759/gun-restrictions-rights-second-amendment-mass-school-shootings-violence-child-porn-pornography
and yes I read the article and get its supposed to be a shocking title that brings people in
Jesus Christ it gets worse
I don't see the problem can someone elaborate
It's generally not good business practice to associate children, non-consenting things, with s***and fetish
isn't helping that the photographer retweeted this terrible article comparison
https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2022/6/7/23152759/gun-restrictions-rights-second-amendment-mass-school-shootings-violence-child-porn-pornography
and yes I read the article and get its supposed to be a shocking title that brings people in
So you’re saying he should be in jail
The document is not from the same weird child photos
“Still, Lapine builds her case by erroneously linking the images to photos from an entirely separate — again, entirely separate — campaign promoting Balenciaga's collaboration with adidas.”
The child p*** document being from ANOTHER campaign makes it even worse tbh. That’s two different Balenciaga projects involving children and sex; wtf is up with that
Following on from your comment above: it seems like a focus on the juxtaposition between childhood innocence and modern life?
If you remove the bondage bear
oh yeah I get that but its just really short sighted
So you’re saying he should be in jail
We need to know the accountability. If he was following directions from the top & all that. It's a business issue foremost
You’re remedial as f*** LMAO
the s*** is real thanks to him showing me the FULL document.
Everyday I wake up i’m glad i’m not as stupid as you niggas
You might think youve peeped the scene, you havent, the real ones far too mean, the watered down one, the one you know, was made up centuries ago
So you’re saying he should be in jail
incorrect. I am saying you don't help people drawing conclusions when you support dumb articles or don't clear things. Again his work outside of this has photographed kids in a better manner. In the case of kids whoever thought pairing them with a bondage toy is odd to me
like the s*** is weird
oh yeah I get that but its just really short sighted
It's a nonsense way to sell clothes
It's a nonsense way to sell clothes
put simply. I am not on some "this is them taunting us they are all in on it " level I am simply "holy s*** these people really didn't think about this or if they did don't really care or see it as even possibly ruining their brand. "
1:37 of this vid
!https://youtu.be/9QIfKKhkl1sBro went 2 minutes in dead silence just to drop a cardboard box of a comment then let the video continue
isn't helping that the photographer retweeted this terrible article comparison
https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2022/6/7/23152759/gun-restrictions-rights-second-amendment-mass-school-shootings-violence-child-porn-pornography
and yes I read the article and get its supposed to be a shocking title that brings people in