YASS SANCTION! F*** CCP! F*** CHINESE! I AM VERY GOOD!
That surveillance tech had such a bright future ahead of it
https://twitter.com/axios/status/1400526288675348481?s=19
Good s*** from the Biden admin
Prob should have been done awhile ago
new report from amnesty international
the word genocide is not used- read it and make up your own minds
Wrong thread
whole thread is full of disinformation. hope many realise the majority of this is just anti-china propoganda. The west is scared of socialism and it always has been; just another such case of NATO powers interfering and trying to destabilse marxist nations.
whole thread is full of disinformation. hope many realise the majority of this is just anti-china propoganda. The west is scared of socialism and it always has been; just another such case of NATO powers interfering and trying to destabilse marxist nations.
China is neither socialist nor marxist? They are a competitor in the world capitalist economy
China is neither socialist nor marxist? They are a competitor in the world capitalist economy
also just saying by defintion china is both socialist and marxist - read their constiution lmfao. i guess they aren't either in the truest, most ideal sense, but they are not neccasaritly 'capitalist' . furthermore this is some interestinf reading to put s*** into perspective :)
reddit.com/r/communism/comments/5ku8dz/china_as_a_socialist_marxistleninist_state_a
This quote especially:
"Examining what companies are truly private is important because privatization is often confused with the spreading out of shareholding and the sale of minority stakes. In China, 100 percent state ownership is often diluted by the division of ownership into shares, some of which are made available to nonstate actors, such as foreign companies or other private investors. Nearly two-thirds of the state-owned enterprises and subsidiaries in China have undertaken such changes, leading some foreign observers to relabel these firms as “nonstate” or even “private.” But this reclassification is incorrect. The sale of stock does nothing by itself to alter state control: dozens of enterprises are no less state controlled simply because they are listed on foreign stock exchanges. As a practical matter, three-quarters of the roughly 1,500 companies listed as domestic stocks are still state owned."
Good thread breaking down what's in the report.
https://twitter.com/GFPhilosophy/status/1404787058774712328this is so real + amnesty international was foudned by british intelligence and employ cia funded propogandists to push their liberal agenda :)
mintpressnews.com/amnesty-international-troubling-collaboration-with-uk-us-intelligence/253939
also just saying by defintion china is both socialist and marxist - read their constiution lmfao. i guess they aren't either in the truest, most ideal sense, but they are not neccasaritly 'capitalist' . furthermore this is some interestinf reading to put s*** into perspective :)
https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/5ku8dz/china_as_a_socialist_marxistleninist_state_a/
This quote especially:
"Examining what companies are truly private is important because privatization is often confused with the spreading out of shareholding and the sale of minority stakes. In China, 100 percent state ownership is often diluted by the division of ownership into shares, some of which are made available to nonstate actors, such as foreign companies or other private investors. Nearly two-thirds of the state-owned enterprises and subsidiaries in China have undertaken such changes, leading some foreign observers to relabel these firms as “nonstate” or even “private.” But this reclassification is incorrect. The sale of stock does nothing by itself to alter state control: dozens of enterprises are no less state controlled simply because they are listed on foreign stock exchanges. As a practical matter, three-quarters of the roughly 1,500 companies listed as domestic stocks are still state owned."
worse wealth inequality than america, worse working hours, state legislating how many kids you can have, no votes, apps instantly banned when they criticise the government (clubhouse)
if i want a great social and economic system you can copy the nordic nations or even ghana and botswana
china is an authoritarian nation
also- just because the prc was founded upon marxist and socialist principles doesnt mean it is able to live up to them- america was founded on classical liberal ideas RE the individual and their rights- yet maintained slavery for many years later
It's best to judge it for what it is rather than what it proclaims to be
this thread is fine and the pro-uighur side have been overall the most reasonable and willing to understand scepticism
there are countless rebuttals to the denialism which when given, are met with ad hominem
this is so real + amnesty international was foudned by british intelligence and employ cia funded propogandists to push their liberal agenda :)
https://www.mintpressnews.com/amnesty-international-troubling-collaboration-with-uk-us-intelligence/253939/
yes the liberal agenda where people have human rights
sounds good to me
reddit.com/r/SocialDemocracy/comments/nz2m21/only_using_the_public_official_chinese_documents
Whether they constitute genocide is something else- but you can literally use chinese government documents to prove they are doing evil
post is literally only sourced by ccp released material
what is the excuse now?
worse wealth inequality than america, worse working hours, state legislating how many kids you can have, no votes, apps instantly banned when they criticise the government (clubhouse)
if i want a great social and economic system you can copy the nordic nations or even ghana and botswana
china is an authoritarian nation
also- just because the prc was founded upon marxist and socialist principles doesnt mean it is able to live up to them- america was founded on classical liberal ideas RE the individual and their rights- yet maintained slavery for many years later
It's best to judge it for what it is rather than what it proclaims to be
i dont neccasarily disagree with what you have to say, but the state mandated kids thing was to comabt a populaion growing at such a rate that china wouldn't be able to handle it lmao. i see ur point about the no voting and i would like to just point out; canada has no term limits nor is everyone entitled to the vote. while its not a one party state like china is neither is authoritarianism neccasarily a bad thing; China has done wonders after the century of shame because of the strong centeral government making efficient and swift descions
furthermore china lifts thousands above the poverty line, and according to state media (which is as trustworthy as any other CIA funded western source or imperialist nation's) absolute poverty in china is pretty much nonexistent: drive.google.com/file/d/1kVz6gmz3kfUBjugYGDpWcyk6irRsz9gw/view?usp=sharing
the nordic nations still exploit the global south; they are just america but with free healthcare lmao.
ur are 100% rightt about judging at face value though, China is at least more marxist than most nations, but definitly not what i would want it to be.
would also like to note that i am not blindly supporting china, i am a staunch critic of CCP imperailism in the south asia and african reguibns
https://www.reddit.com/r/SocialDemocracy/comments/nz2m21/only_using_the_public_official_chinese_documents/
Whether they constitute genocide is something else- but you can literally use chinese government documents to prove they are doing evil
post is literally only sourced by ccp released material
what is the excuse now?
wheres ur outrage about this? every state commits evil but China isn't committing genocide against uighur population. so much evidence to posit that most of these camps dont even exist and pretty much all claims are unsubstantiated.
on a side note sick avi king crule is dope i love the ooz
i dont neccasarily disagree with what you have to say, but the state mandated kids thing was to comabt a populaion growing at such a rate that china wouldn't be able to handle it lmao. i see ur point about the no voting and i would like to just point out; canada has no term limits nor is everyone entitled to the vote. while its not a one party state like china is neither is authoritarianism neccasarily a bad thing; China has done wonders after the century of shame because of the strong centeral government making efficient and swift descions
furthermore china lifts thousands above the poverty line, and according to state media (which is as trustworthy as any other CIA funded western source or imperialist nation's) absolute poverty in china is pretty much nonexistent: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kVz6gmz3kfUBjugYGDpWcyk6irRsz9gw/view?usp=sharing
the nordic nations still exploit the global south; they are just america but with free healthcare lmao.
ur are 100% rightt about judging at face value though, China is at least more marxist than most nations, but definitly not what i would want it to be.
would also like to note that i am not blindly supporting china, i am a staunch critic of CCP imperailism in the south asia and african reguibns
Global south countries can be prosperous social democracies. Ghana and Botswana are on their way to it