Done arguing with high school level logic.
Did what I could

You haven't persuaded anyone because you have a single argument which fails to disprove the point, you're blinded by auto hatred of America so you think they cant be correct about anything worse

LMFAOOOO your arguments think that CIA funneling millions into propoganda is for the purpose of "slander" and that there is no material benefit from it

Then you do some weird fliparoo "Gotcha!" Where you claim China does the same s*** like I give a f***

Then you claim that Mao killed his own people

Just shows you have never read a book
Don't know how to make actual arguments with critical thinking
You just resort to logical fallcies.
Have fun in ur liberal heaven that American education has given u

Idk about this argument but even tho I dislike what people call liberals whenever I see someone saying liberal so and so in an argument I gotta cringe

Conservatives ruined it

Obviously it isnt just slander, I was understating

Also maos actions killed millions of peasants

It's not my fault you're a tankie f***ing idiot

Frankly Mao was a brutal, fat bully who can stay dead, he killed millions and china only started growing prosperous with Deng. The best countries on earth are liberal democracies, deal with it tankie

people who cap for wanting a chinese global hegemony are legitimately some of the most insufferable people on this planet. legitimately don't care if you hate the US; almost no one would argue you aren't probably justified and it's not exactly a subversive or transgressive view to hate the US at this point. like literally virtually everyone would agree getting rid of US global hegemony is a good idea; you can find articles about this s*** in Vox which when extrapolated even f***ing legitimate neo-nazis agree with tankies on. there is virtually no reason to want a modern chinese hegemony to replace an american one. mao isn't coming back and everything he did was basically futile. at least people who cap for the USSR can make at least some level of cultural argument against liberalism. i don't care if you believe this uighur s*** is real or not. dengism is a cringe and wanting it exported to the rest of the world is idiotic and nonsensical especially if you consider yourself communist and/or socialist

There are a multitude if other sources

So you only have whataboutism to offer. Got it

The thread outright says we dont f*** with ICE camps either. This thread is about the Uighurs. You can go make a thread about that if you want to

I also dont care if there is a link to the NED, being linked to america does not make them wrong.

All these threads end up with the argument "america actually doesnt care about democracy and countries only care about their own interest" yeah no s***????

The Iraq war was wrong and bad

I dont know why you assume everyone who disagrees with you is ignorant. Dislike of us hegemony is not a rare opinion. Most US citizens dont f*** with external wars

But we are talking about the Uighur genocide now, not american war crimes

Imagine hating the US so much youre literally questioning whether China is putting people in reeducation camps

This is like when Noam Chomsky took the fat L by questioning the Cambodian Genocide because he was hyper skeptical due to US involvement and now as a result he has to deal with being called a Cambodian genocide denier.

There is skepticism and then theres floating 167 page google docs of propaganda and just feigning ignorance because you hate the US.

And its no wonder that the first time a poster like Synopsis drops into this thread is in telling people to question the Uighur cultural genocide claims when no one denies theyre being put in reeducation camps.

Not even worth debating this s***. Clown show 101, its literally troll tier levels of skepticism where you have to wait for literal news from China on the Uighur camps.

We really cant have news from The Intercept, The Guardian, any acclaimed source we generally get news from thats considered to be held in high standard in Journalism

We really have to wait for some obscure series of info that doesnt derive from any European country, the USA, or a country with ties to the USA.

We really need Russia or China to expose this before irs believeable. Thats f***ing crazy fam

I propose the mods dont even allow threads like this anymore. This s*** is compromised

And I dont even try to post in this section anymore because every post is f***ing garbage

And the worst part is we know damn well, no one was or is going to do anything about the Uighur camps in China regardless.
At least to any substantial degree.

We literally have John Bolton alledging us that Trump said the Uighur camps were the right thing to do.

Our past admin obviously didnt give a f*** about the Uighurs outside of performative posturing.

So I dont feel the strong need to pull this hyperskepticism as if we clearly cant infer that some level of damage is being inflicted on the Uighur population

Its not even saying believe every source but these camps obviously exist and China clearly seeks to hide them from view

I dont think any other country would get away with this and have such "Ignore every potential news source I would otherwise use in a debate online" type post

Anyway Im out, dont quote me, dont tag me

P.S.
@lilyth_
Also this poster isnt even smart. Yes, the US has concentration camps on its own soil. US citizens are the ones calling it out.

This dude is literally reposting Articles from the Sun, a UK tabloid, but we cant post NYTIMES or The Intercept articles unless they s*** talk the US?

Like this dude literally grabbed a random source out of a hat lol. This Journalistic integrity goes out the window the moment the US is involved. Yall finna let people source police you over The Guardian but niggas can just post the Sun. Clown s***, clown posts, clown thread

Mods stop allowing these f***ing threads if youre not going to moderate them

welp looks like op should check his sources better next time. Adrian Zenz is a far right-wing psycho who can’t be trusted, and every single article about this uses him as a source.