Reply
  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    CLB Fractions

    its meant to treat each state as equal 50 states 2 senators each.

    thats not undemocratic

    also most americans do not "support center left policies"

    also if you were to fet rid of the senate you would need to change the way the whole country is ran.

    The country was not even remotely close to as urbanized when the Constitution (and therefore the Senate) was created. The Senate was created with the assumption that a huge portion of the population would be living in rural states.

    Same thing with the creation of states. The rules for what should be considered enough population to constitute an entire new state when people were moving Westward in the 1800s was not at all “future proofed”. If it was, there wouldn’t be 2 separate Dakotas lol.

    And to your point about the country not supporting center left policies, that’s true. It would be more accurate to say that most people in the US favor outright leftist policies.

  • Mar 14, 2021
    Young D

    The country was not even remotely close to as urbanized when the Constitution (and therefore the Senate) was created. The Senate was created with the assumption that a huge portion of the population would be living in rural states.

    Same thing with the creation of states. The rules for what should be considered enough population to constitute an entire new state when people were moving Westward in the 1800s was not at all “future proofed”. If it was, there wouldn’t be 2 separate Dakotas lol.

    And to your point about the country not supporting center left policies, that’s true. It would be more accurate to say that most people in the US favor outright leftist policies.

    I agree with the first part. I just dont think geting rid of the senate is the answer I think we should abolish states. have people vote for a party and just have one big legislative body similar to a parliament. so everyone has a voice etc.

    also most of usa does not support leftist policies this is false. most of usa is centrist/center right

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    CLB Fractions

    look up how the usa was formed... the states came together etc its a unique history behind it.

    If you were to abolish senate then you should abolish states as well.

    I know you said economically center left and thats false... you need to learn to read

    Ik how the US was formed

    Considering canada has provinces, france has provinces, Australia has states so that’s just plain false wtf r u talking about

    How tf will states disappear if senators disappear thats my preferred policy prescription but not even what we’re talking about. We’re talking about adding more states to take away the outsized voices empty, sparse “red” land has on American legislation.

    Just because you say something doesn’t make it true tf kind of debator are you? Show me two economic conservative policies that have/had majoritarian support, the trump tax cuts?

    I cant even name anymore past that cus modern economic conservativism is so intellectually bankrupt policy wise, all they can talk about is cultural issues like blm, immigration, police and dr seuss.

    Meanwhile medicare for all has like 50% NATIONALLY, over 60% including just independents and dems. A public option is even higher

    15$ Minimum wage outperformed both biden AND trump in Florida. Trump carried the state by like 52% but the provision passed with voters by like 60%. Thats a red state. Nationally last poll i saw had it around 70% among all voters

    Same thing for free college, child credits, labor policies so on

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Young D

    The country was not even remotely close to as urbanized when the Constitution (and therefore the Senate) was created. The Senate was created with the assumption that a huge portion of the population would be living in rural states.

    Same thing with the creation of states. The rules for what should be considered enough population to constitute an entire new state when people were moving Westward in the 1800s was not at all “future proofed”. If it was, there wouldn’t be 2 separate Dakotas lol.

    And to your point about the country not supporting center left policies, that’s true. It would be more accurate to say that most people in the US favor outright leftist policies.

    Nigga really trying to defend the utility of an institution that was created when people OWNED people and showered like once a month

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Maartins

    Nigga really trying to defend the utility of an institution that was created when people OWNED people and showered like once a month

    when did i defend it? read...

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Maartins

    Ik how the US was formed

    Considering canada has provinces, france has provinces, Australia has states so that’s just plain false wtf r u talking about

    How tf will states disappear if senators disappear thats my preferred policy prescription but not even what we’re talking about. We’re talking about adding more states to take away the outsized voices empty, sparse “red” land has on American legislation.

    Just because you say something doesn’t make it true tf kind of debator are you? Show me two economic conservative policies that have/had majoritarian support, the trump tax cuts?

    I cant even name anymore past that cus modern economic conservativism is so intellectually bankrupt policy wise, all they can talk about is cultural issues like blm, immigration, police and dr seuss.

    Meanwhile medicare for all has like 50% NATIONALLY, over 60% including just independents and dems. A public option is even higher

    15$ Minimum wage outperformed both biden AND trump in Florida. Trump carried the state by like 52% but the provision passed with voters by like 60%. Thats a red state. Nationally last poll i saw had it around 70% among all voters

    Same thing for free college, child credits, labor policies so on

    u clearly dont if ur comparing states to provinces...

    also i never said most of usa is conservative? nice strawman

    also most americans do not support medicare for all they support universal coverage which is different.

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    CLB Fractions

    when did i defend it? read...

    I just saw yr post

    It still doesn’t make sense. I support one legislative body like a parliamentary system as well cus i think they favor the voices of the people better.

    The house democrats are the perfect example like they are solidly center left, while senate dems are more center (speaking from a global perspective what would be considered left, center left and center)

    It’s actually been amazing to see. People love to hate nancy pelosi and i dnt share the same politics as her, im more to her left but the house passed a minimum wage, the labor bill PRO act, the john lewis voting act etc. The house has regularly been more progressive and representative for the past 4-7 years and that’s how it should be in a democratic system

    US senators are too detached from people, not to mention the arcane senate rules like the filibuster that exacerbate the detachment

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Shabazz999

    so the 700,000+ residents of DC don't deserve representation in congress? and lobbyists tend to be transplants who have no connection to the rest of the city.

    the very simple solution would be to create a separate enclave where the federal government will continue to function and give the rest of the city statehood

    No, they don't.

    That's the whole point of the power the lobbyists have.

    Or we can leave things the way they are now so your side doesn't get 2 more senators which is really what this is about.

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    CLB Fractions

    u clearly dont if ur comparing states to provinces...

    also i never said most of usa is conservative? nice strawman

    also most americans do not support medicare for all they support universal coverage which is different.

    Provinces are literally just states man

    There is no difference except some systems they have more or less autonomy. France for example is extremely centralized but canadian provinces actually have slightly more autonomy than us states. They control their medicare for all systems separately, and quebec has immigration autonomy for foreigners but other than that on tax laws, education etc they operate virtually the same way American states do

    There is absolutely nothing that implies eliminating senators would eliminate states

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    If people really cared that much about representation, they'd just add DC to Maryland. They don't for a reason

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Maartins
    · edited

    I just saw yr post

    It still doesn’t make sense. I support one legislative body like a parliamentary system as well cus i think they favor the voices of the people better.

    The house democrats are the perfect example like they are solidly center left, while senate dems are more center (speaking from a global perspective what would be considered left, center left and center)

    It’s actually been amazing to see. People love to hate nancy pelosi and i dnt share the same politics as her, im more to her left but the house passed a minimum wage, the labor bill PRO act, the john lewis voting act etc. The house has regularly been more progressive and representative for the past 4-7 years and that’s how it should be in a democratic system

    US senators are too detached from people, not to mention the arcane senate rules like the filibuster that exacerbate the detachment

    I partially qgree with what you are saying. I just think we should change how the legislative branch is entirely.

    instead of for example one voting district getting one representative where the minority in that district are not represented. have a national vote. for example

    50% of usa voters support blue
    40% support red
    5% green
    5% yellow
    then based on vote % distribute seats

    I think this is a better way for more voices to be heard while being democratic this would also allow for more parties

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    Saint Aquinas

    If people really cared that much about representation, they'd just add DC to Maryland. They don't for a reason

    We care about representation AND diluting the power of empty pieces of land lmaoo what No one is denying that. It’s not a cynical take, it’s literally a save democracy take, people calling for this are very open about why it’s needed

    Can u imagine what 20 yrs from now when urbanization is even worse how lopsided things will be. The 50 republican senators ALREADY represent 40 million less people? That doesn’t bother you a little? Even on sentimental level when thinking about the health and validity of our democracy?

  • Mar 14, 2021

    Let’s not get started on the electoral college smh

  • Mar 14, 2021
    Maartins
    · edited

    We care about representation AND diluting the power of empty pieces of land lmaoo what No one is denying that. It’s not a cynical take, it’s literally a save democracy take, people calling for this are very open about why it’s needed

    Can u imagine what 20 yrs from now when urbanization is even worse how lopsided things will be. The 50 republican senators ALREADY represent 40 million less people? That doesn’t bother you a little? Even on sentimental level when thinking about the health and validity of our democracy?

    Lmfaooooooo

  • Mar 14, 2021
    Maartins

    Provinces are literally just states man

    There is no difference except some systems they have more or less autonomy. France for example is extremely centralized but canadian provinces actually have slightly more autonomy than us states. They control their medicare for all systems separately, and quebec has immigration autonomy for foreigners but other than that on tax laws, education etc they operate virtually the same way American states do

    There is absolutely nothing that implies eliminating senators would eliminate states

    when the states formed they acted almost as sovereign entities. each state had a unique culture etc. this is the whole reason why we have two chambers.

    new jersey plan wanted just one chamber and every state two senators but they compromised etc

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Saint Aquinas

    No, they don't.

    That's the whole point of the power the lobbyists have.

    Or we can leave things the way they are now so your side doesn't get 2 more senators which is really what this is about.

    "my side" my guy idgaf about democrats or republicans and anyone in this sxn can attest to that. if the capital of the country was oklahoma city and it's residents wanted statehood i would still support it. this country was founded on no taxation without representation right?

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    CLB Fractions

    I partially qgree with what you are saying. I just think we should change how the legislative branch is entirely.

    instead of for example one voting district getting one representative where the minority in that district are not represented. have a national vote. for example

    50% of usa voters support blue
    40% support red
    5% green
    5% yellow
    then based on vote % distribute seats

    I think this is a better way for more voices to be heard while being democratic this would also allow for more parties

    Ye i see yr point

    In a perfect world maybe but rn extra states are the most viable reforms

  • Mar 14, 2021
    Maartins

    We care about representation AND diluting the power of empty pieces of land lmaoo what No one is denying that. It’s not a cynical take, it’s literally a save democracy take, people calling for this are very open about why it’s needed

    Can u imagine what 20 yrs from now when urbanization is even worse how lopsided things will be. The 50 republican senators ALREADY represent 40 million less people? That doesn’t bother you a little? Even on sentimental level when thinking about the health and validity of our democracy?

    the 40 million is somewhat misleading imo but ur point stans

    biden won by 7 million votes the split should be similar to that

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Maartins

    Ye i see yr point

    In a perfect world maybe but rn extra states are the most viable reforms

    redraw the states lmao

    but i think its fine as is because u only need 51 votes in the senate to end fillibuster and pass whatever you want. i think it should be higher tbh

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    CLB Fractions

    redraw the states lmao

    but i think its fine as is because u only need 51 votes in the senate to end fillibuster and pass whatever you want. i think it should be higher tbh

    google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/11/6/21550979/senate-malapportionment-20-million-democrats-republicans-supreme-court

    I see yr logic but yr not extrapolating correctly. This methodology used what party the senator caucus with then extrapolated that to population of the state

    So lets say south dak elected two republican senators (bcus those voters lean conservative) then the whole population of tht state is represented by them even tho the whole population didnt vote for them

    I think what yr trying to do is go by vote ratios democrat senators won vs republican senators but we’re talking representation of people and ideas

    So using that logic a state like cali that has more people than canada or state like ny with 20 million people hving 4 senators between them u quickly see how it adds up. Democratic senate delegations simply just represent more people and voters quantitatively

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Shabazz999

    "my side" my guy idgaf about democrats or republicans and anyone in this sxn can attest to that. if the capital of the country was oklahoma city and it's residents wanted statehood i would still support it. this country was founded on no taxation without representation right?

    "no taxation without representation" does not inherently mean direct representation given the history of our country.

    And of course they want statehood. That's more power. Doesnt mean it makes sense to grant it to them. A capital is designed to be just that. Nothing more.

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Maartins

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/11/6/21550979/senate-malapportionment-20-million-democrats-republicans-supreme-court

    I see yr logic but yr not extrapolating correctly. This methodology used what party the senator caucus with then extrapolated that to population of the state

    So lets say south dak elected two republican senators (bcus those voters lean conservative) then the whole population of tht state is represented by them even tho the whole population didnt vote for them

    I think what yr trying to do is go by vote ratios democrat senators won vs republican senators but we’re talking representation of people and ideas

    So using that logic a state like cali that has more people than canada or state like ny with 20 million people hving 4 senators between them u quickly see how it adds up. Democratic senate delegations simply just represent more people and voters quantitatively

    Yea i understand that but i think its faulty to look at it that way. ideally congress would be split by how the people in the country are thinking.

    lets say 2 republicans won texas senate yes they represent the whole state but the 40% democrats there arent having their voices heard at all.

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    CLB Fractions

    Yea i understand that but i think its faulty to look at it that way. ideally congress would be split by how the people in the country are thinking.

    lets say 2 republicans won texas senate yes they represent the whole state but the 40% democrats there arent having their voices heard at all.

    Eh either way when taking in voter suppression and lack of participation the ratio still isnt like the biden trump election, which was a 51-46 win

    Only 50 plus percent of Americans vote. In Canada it’s 74%, Australia it’s 90% plus. Most other developed countries are in those ranges

    And no the 56% of currenr voting americans still isn’t representative enough bcus we know non voters skew lower income and minority, in other people who’d vote dem or parties who are left of dem (a large percent of current dem national election voters would vote for a party who are left of dems if it were a viable as things already are)

    I really do think the current republican coalition is a minority one that wouldn’t hv any real path to a majority in a real democratic and fair system

    Using that logic that’s why id argue the senate representation ratio is a better metric bcus it places republican ideas at around 35%-40% max. Which also tracks with trumps approval rating throughout his term

  • Mar 14, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Saint Aquinas

    "no taxation without representation" does not inherently mean direct representation given the history of our country.

    And of course they want statehood. That's more power. Doesnt mean it makes sense to grant it to them. A capital is designed to be just that. Nothing more.

    was the argument not that britain had no right to tax the 13 colonies if they had no representation in parliament?

    and ok, a capital only serves to be a capital...what's stopping an enclave of the capitol, scotus, white house, national mall, etc from being a functional capital of the country? the federal government and the local government of DC already operate separately.

    and lobbyists still live in virginia and maryland and all across the country, dissolving DC into maryland wouldn't lessen the influence of lobbyists so long as money in politics still exist. that argument isn't making sense to me, seems like the only reason you opposs DC statehood is because the city is heavily democratic.

  • Mar 14, 2021
    Maartins

    Eh either way when taking in voter suppression and lack of participation the ratio still isnt like the biden trump election, which was a 51-46 win

    Only 50 plus percent of Americans vote. In Canada it’s 74%, Australia it’s 90% plus. Most other developed countries are in those ranges

    And no the 56% of currenr voting americans still isn’t representative enough bcus we know non voters skew lower income and minority, in other people who’d vote dem or parties who are left of dem (a large percent of current dem national election voters would vote for a party who are left of dems if it were a viable as things already are)

    I really do think the current republican coalition is a minority one that wouldn’t hv any real path to a majority in a real democratic and fair system

    Using that logic that’s why id argue the senate representation ratio is a better metric bcus it places republican ideas at around 35%-40% max. Which also tracks with trumps approval rating throughout his term

    agree on a lot of what you said. under popular vote with two parties a republican president would never win.

    I just dont think adding states is the way to go. a system overhaul is needed