I’m writing an essay for you all in relation to Nietzsche and I’m wondering if any philosopher went as hard as him, I don’t know… he got on everybody ass and did it with such brilliance and skill. He weaved things few have and completely disarmed many before him. Good philosophy went deep while staying at the surface. Metaphysical while completely natural. His call to the human… wow. What y’all think?
I like Nietzsche but i'm not deep.
I've heard people say his teachings are depressing but I don't get the same impression
I like Nietzsche but i'm not deep.
I've heard people say his teachings are depressing but I don't get the same impression
If anything they are full of hope. The thing is he does deconstruct a lot of moral belief and does confront the vanity and flaws of an individual. Reading Nietzsche you will be confronted with yourself and the limitations in your beliefs in various aspects. The ego is very much challenged.
always gotta give jung his flowers
and zapffe for being the most hardass son of a b**** for his take on human consciousness being overdeveloped and causing us to be rejected from nature
always gotta give jung his flowers
and zapffe for being the most hardass son of a b**** for his take on human consciousness being overdeveloped and causing us to be rejected from nature
Jung is my favorite
always gotta give jung his flowers
and zapffe for being the most hardass son of a b**** for his take on human consciousness being overdeveloped and causing us to be rejected from nature
I should read more into Zapffe, but he seems too biological and scientific. He doesn’t seem to address the metaphysical. Addressing the ontology of it all in a very practical way. Which to me is answering by saying he can’t answer it. Which is contradictory because he acknowledged men have developed a consciousness worthy of asking and answering the questions. It also seems to me to imply man is greater than his nature, while being lesser than his nature which is also contradictory.
And although I’m not as versed on psychology, Jung is good
I should read more into Zapffe, but he seems too biological and scientific. He doesn’t seem to address the metaphysical. Addressing the ontology of it all in a very practical way. Which to me is answering by saying he can’t answer it. Which is contradictory because he acknowledged men have developed a consciousness worthy of asking and answering the questions. It also seems to me to imply man is greater than his nature, while being lesser than his nature which is also contradictory.
And although I’m not as versed on psychology, Jung is good
Yeah he's not on the same level metaphysically but when I was deep in my depression charged antinatalist reading his s*** slapped lol
Hegel
nietzche was an annoying coward with no b****es and an incest fetish
whiny mfer for real
Yeah he's not on the same level metaphysically but when I was deep in my depression charged antinatalist reading his s*** slapped lol
Lmaoo understandable
nietzche was an annoying coward with no b****es and an incest fetish
Nietzsche has more hoes then you
Hegel
Ahh Hegel, his good, very good. Important. But Nietzsche did it different. Idk if Hegel did it different. If you know what I mean?
if we talmbout ppl who did it different we gotta shoutout camus
nietzche's dead
His words live on. And bad b****es reading em for their philosophy requirement class in college. And when they hate on him or call him a whiny loser. You tell them your poetic and melancholic interpretation of him. And they get wet and vulnerable with you so you can be hard and vulnerable with them cause they think you’re a misunderstood tortured soul. And they want to be the only one who really understands you on an intimate level(Since their ego leads them to believe they are the only one capable of that! Ha!). And when you get p****, Nietzsche gets p**** through you
His words live on. And bad b****es reading em for their philosophy requirement class in college. And when they hate on him or call him a whiny loser. You tell them your poetic and melancholic interpretation of him. And they get wet and vulnerable with you so you can be hard and vulnerable with them cause they think you’re a misunderstood tortured soul. And they want to be the only one who really understands you on an intimate level(Since their ego leads them to believe they are the only one capable of that! Ha!). And when you get p****, Nietzsche gets p**** through you
blogs.law.columbia.edu/nietzsche1313/8-13
reading fanon through nietzsche @PhilipMorris
https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/nietzsche1313/8-13/
reading fanon through nietzsche @PhilipMorris
The things academia does to Fanon are ridiculous