His defense needs that picture. No homie looking challenged like that could possibly commit these crimes

This would be the case if government adequately proved instances of violence were directly related to her being uncooperative to sexual acts

So far all but one of the instances had to do with jealousy, cassie seeing other people and d****

The governments smoking gun so far is the video which they interpreted, with the help of cassies testimony, as cassie trying to escape a freak off

A logical juror wouldn’t be so certain instances of violence and "freak offs " were entirely related based on the strings of texts defence presented

But I doubt this will be a logical decision anyway

They did

She said it and you can’t divorce the grooming, violence, control, coercion, stalking, etc from that. To act like she was being abused and controlled by him in every single facet of her life and then turn around and say she was happily participating is obtuse. He beat her DURING freak offs, there are texts obviously manipulating her to participate when she doesn’t want to and she clearly has Stockholm syndrome

He said that he picked Cassie because she’s young and moldable

There were texts insinuating freak off or else

Or was there a text saying - "one last freak off ?"
after which she insinuated she didn’t want it to be the last one

I’ll let you extrapolate the evidence to wherever it takes you to fit your bias on your own because you haven’t had a single clear-eyed take on this case itt

Yeah I mean in theory, it’s plausible.

The idea / defense that the DV is all tied to jealousy, and that we were both just big ol freaks doing consensual adult s***shit. There are no hard text msgs of Cassie planting her flag stating she hates freak offs for example. On the contrary, the thousands of messages says otherwise.

There’s no real evidence in real time that she wasn’t it.

The problem is that that’s an incredibly hard plane to land in the eyes of the jury and regular people. Especially when you factor in the age and wealth gap.

To put it bluntly, a young 22 year old who’s entire life is controlled by a billionaire who’s 25 years older than her and who financially, emotionally and physically abused her turns her out and puts her onto the most deviant of sexual s*** makes sense.

If a 39 year old Cassie says she only took piss and c***from random Johns and rubbed c***on Diddy’s nipples because she was scared of what Diddy would do to her if he got angry, and we have evidence of what him being angry looks like…jury’s going to roll with that, IMO

the only person doing that is you who comes here repeatedly to say you must not have seen the cross

I could say you haven’t seen the prosecution

Prosecutors revealed photos of the s***workers involved in the Diddy and Cassie 'Freak-offs'.

All I'm gonna say is MGK didnt blow up until P Diddy took him under his wing around Rage Pack mixtape

Middle is that guy who had that video going on that rant in a police interview?

The one back in 2018 right? That is actually crazy wtf

yea his name is Jonathan Oddi.

Cassie mentioned him by name during her testimony and said she didn't trust him after he recorded one of the freak off sessions.

Heard she said this but didn't know it was him Damn, sounds like they didn't even really vet the s***workers they used, just used escort services or take up any offers on Craigslist. Diddy must've been h**** af, risky af for a celebrity

the guy underneath Cassie is in jail for murder

he was on that showtime show gigolos

Diddy wasn't the one on craigslist, Cassie was lol

My hot take is that you kind of want a sketchy s***worker to a degree fr if you're going to engage in s*** like that.

Jesus, you’re right. He was saying some s*** too

Y'all think they gonna call up Scott/Cudi at some point in this case???

Trial has started

[Before jurors come in]
Combs' Agnifilo: We oppose David James testifying about the incident with Suge Knight. He's going to mention D-Roc, say he was a friend of Biggie Smalls - that's decades ago, not relevant.
Judge: Seems you are previewing your cross

[Witness / personal assistant David James takes the stand]
Judge Subramanian: Good morning. Welcome back.
Courtroom deputy: We are missing four jurors. It may be the subways.
Judge: OK, we'll reconvene

this man really trying to get in front of his bullshit 😭😭😭

[OK, jurors have belatedly arrived]
AUSA Slavik: What about physical violence between Mr. Combs and Cassie - did you personally observe it?
David James: No, I did not.
AUSA: Do you remember a blog post-
David James: Yes. I was in LA when he came back from a club

AUSA Slavik: What did Mr. Combs say?
David James: That someone was lying on him, saying he hit Cassie at the club. He went through my browser history. No one had ever done that to me.

AUSA: Did Mr. Combs give you instructions about Cassie?
David James: To bring her food at the London Hotel - some Roscoe's
AUSA: What is Roscoe's?
David James: Some delicious fried chicken in Los Angeles