Lmao the OG KTT thread is a part of this case

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.589097/gov.uscourts.nysd.589097.12.9.pdf
@op add the url to the pdf in the post
Shoutout the highlighted users
@Moscato
@dirtbag
@SinceKumbaya
@theoneandonly
@OVOLeBron
Congrats
No way bruh loool
Drake’s lawyer:
Lawyers gonna pull up the Her Loss reaction thread with the hentai gifs
Wtf lmaooo and what the f*** do they think this “proves” this was literally before we all found out it wasn’t legit. They wanna frame it as if it is tho of course which simply isn’t true.
The point is that they used a legit copyright to mislead for promotion at one time
The point is that they used a legit copyright to mislead for promotion at one time
But isn’t it fair use if it is parody and not sold?
Wtf lmaooo and what the f*** do they think this “proves” this was literally before we all found out it wasn’t legit. They wanna frame it as if it is tho of course which simply isn’t true.
No, they're suing for impersonating. Those people thinking it was real then finding out it's actually fake is proof that their marketing was taking their branding ☠️
No, they're suing for impersonating. Those people thinking it was real then finding out it's actually fake is proof that their marketing was taking their branding ☠️
They were trolling
But isn’t it fair use if it is parody and not sold?
Not if it was used to make money. It'd be different if he just posted a fake version to his social media like Ye did with Time Cover magazine.
But isn’t it fair use if it is parody and not sold?
The announcement and the use of the copyright was not parodied in any of the promotion, just in the magazine itself
And even if the magazine was free, it was part of promotion for a paid work (the album.) that’s why there’s a highlighted passage of “I hope they talk about the album”
They were trolling
They're going to be arguing to the jury that they weren't trolling
Not if it was used to make money. It'd be different if he just posted a fake version to his social media like Ye did with Time Cover magazine.
Nah you can make money off of parody. The issue is whether or not the use of Vogue WAS a parody by drake
Under U.S. Copyright Law, a parody can be considered a “derivative” work protected from copyright infringement claims by the fair use doctrine.
Vogue is probably claiming this Drake’s use of their trademark is not a parody relative to the announcement and distribution of the magazine
The announcement and the use of the copyright was not parodied in any of the promotion, just in the magazine itself
And even if the magazine was free, it was part of promotion for a paid work (the album.) that’s why there’s a highlighted passage of “I hope they talk about the album”
It seems dumb imo still I don’t get why they would sue when in reality if they didn’t make a fuss people would have forgotten a year or 2 down the road. It’s Vouge are they really that down bad for money they gotta do this?
Lmao the OG KTT thread is a part of this case

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.589097/gov.uscourts.nysd.589097.12.9.pdf
@op add the url to the pdf in the post
Shoutout the highlighted users
@Moscato
@dirtbag
@SinceKumbaya
@theoneandonly
@OVOLeBron
Congrats
It seems like ktt is the main piece evidence (for people supposedly thinking it real and not a parody)
& Wikipedia
Nah she’s the one right here
https://twitter.com/dailyloud/status/1584670317988827136If we’re talking about looks then it should be either
If we’re talking about the Petty King baiting Ye so he can release the rumored Hitler-Themed Diss Song then the obvious choice is Kim
It seems dumb imo still I don’t get why they would sue when in reality if they didn’t make a fuss people would have forgotten a year or 2 down the road. It’s Vouge are they really that down bad for money they gotta do this?
Would you let other people make money off your name without giving you a cent?
They're going to be arguing to the jury that they weren't trolling
Lmaooo
roll out the spider p***