Would you let other people make money off your name without giving you a cent?
it's going to be impossible to prove people listened to the album solely because of the vogue cover
If we’re talking about looks then it should be either
If we’re talking about the Petty King baiting Ye so he can release the rumored Hitler-Themed Diss Song then the obvious choice is Kim
💀💀
Using ktt as one of the MAIN pieces of evidence in a case like this is actual insanity
Using ktt as one of the MAIN pieces of evidence in a case like this is actual insanity
this how i know they taking the L
imagine using ktt as a cited source
@AnnaWintour you’re right, all the Drake fans thought it was real and starting promoting it on their Instagram’s.
Add KTT2 to the lawsuit and tell them you’ll drop them from the suit if they shut down the Drake section.
Would you let other people make money off your name without giving you a cent?
It just doesn’t feel right claiming they made money as much as that can be argued. Directly out of everything parodied how much in reality did a fake magazine really impact the sales of the album? I can say hardly at all if none cause people were checking it out regardless. It’s 50/50 to me at least but wtf do I know
this how i know they taking the L
imagine using ktt as a cited source
Like brah
theres a good chance the highlighted users will get a summons to testify in court
it's OVER
it's going to be impossible to prove people listened to the album solely because of the vogue cover
They probably honestly don’t care about winning
Prosecution is prob just a Kendrick stan
it's going to be impossible to prove people listened to the album solely because of the vogue cover
You are missing the point, and being obtuse at the same time
It’s not about people listening because of Vogue, it’s about people relating the use of Vogue to the album in a non-parody manner, which is what is being highlighted in the KTT screenshots
theres a good chance the highlighted users will get a summons to testify in court
it's OVER
Drake might have to get rid of them and claim they were bots.
21’s millionaire status hangs in the balance, he has no choice.
You are missing the point, and being obtuse at the same time
It’s not about people listening because of Vogue, it’s about people relating the use of Vogue to the album in a non-parody manner, which is what is being highlighted in the KTT screenshots
Bro NAAHHHHH
You are missing the point, and being obtuse at the same time
It’s not about people listening because of Vogue, it’s about people relating the use of Vogue to the album in a non-parody manner, which is what is being highlighted in the KTT screenshots
okay
but does that have to do with the album
You are missing the point, and being obtuse at the same time
It’s not about people listening because of Vogue, it’s about people relating the use of Vogue to the album in a non-parody manner, which is what is being highlighted in the KTT screenshots
Obtuse
Rubber Goose
Green Moose
Guava Juice
Giant Snake
Birthday Cake!
all i know is Lendrick stans took another L
It just doesn’t feel right claiming they made money as much as that can be argued. Directly out of everything parodied how much in reality did a fake magazine really impact the sales of the album? I can say hardly at all if none cause people were checking it out regardless. It’s 50/50 to me at least but wtf do I know
If you were one of the largest magazine publications in the world, and one of the largest artists in the world used your name and you didn’t do s***, what precedent would that set for smaller artists? They could take your s*** too
Before you know it, your brand is unprotected and you miss out on a LOT more money than what you anticipated. Protecting branding is something that should be proactive and unapologetic in the business world
okay
but does that have to do with the album
Nothing
it has to do with drake and Vogue
VOGUE fucking MAGAZINE sues DRAKE:
KTT:

If you were one of the largest magazine publications in the world, and one of the largest artists in the world used your name and you didn’t do s***, what precedent would that set for smaller artists? They could take your s*** too
Before you know it, your brand is unprotected and you miss out on a LOT more money than what you anticipated. Protecting branding is something that should be proactive and unapologetic in the business world
B**** move by Vogue cause Drake is GOATed
But this is facts. You gotta protect the copyright
If you were one of the largest magazine publications in the world, and one of the largest artists in the world used your name and you didn’t do s***, what precedent would that set for smaller artists? They could take your s*** too
Before you know it, your brand is unprotected and you miss out on a LOT more money than what you anticipated. Protecting branding is something that should be proactive and unapologetic in the business world
As true as that is I feel like it literally is separated because it is Drake. It could be argued that people are gonna inquire about Vouge more and look into it bringing attention to them. Double edged sword in my eyes and that’s why I think this will get thrown out or just settled. No way they walk away with the 4 mill or whatever it was they want.