mos def 🪐Jan 18, 2025·3 replies
Jan 18, 2025·2 replies
The Darkest AngelStreamers aren't getting sued. Spotify ain't named in this new lawsuit. He going strictly at UMG. Drake and Spotify may have worked something out hence them coming into an agreement and not denying the allegations, unlike UMG
ppl who reacted to not like us are in it
Jan 18, 2025mos def
He unfazed
Jan 18, 2025YE17ppl who reacted to not like us are in it
- Jan 18, 2025YE17
ppl who reacted to not like us are in it
They’re not getting sued
However, Drake is saying they were paid by UMG to promote NLU. That’s why they’re mad
Jan 18, 2025mos def
drake stans, please remember that if you deny that drake has lost money, is personally humiliated, is experiencing mental anguish, suffering and emotional distress as a result of NLU you are undermining his lawsuit
if Drake's lawsuit has merit, he is experiencing all of these things. if he is not experiencing these things he is committing perjury, which of course we know he wouldn't do
- Jan 18, 2025·1 reply
RIZGODNot a***ogous to this suit at all. A news network falsely accusing someone of profiting from and exploiting people trying to escape Afghanistan in a news report presented as factual is not the same as Drake crying at a label because a rapper said some mean things about him in a song and they promoted it
Truth is a defence to defamation in almost every jurisdiction around the world. All UMG have to do is show evidence that Drake has displayed inappropriate behaviour around underage girls. And you know that'll be easy to do
Didn't ask your opinion.
- Jan 18, 2025thegreatdivine
Didn't ask your opinion.
did you ask a 17 year old if it's okay to grope them once?
- Jan 18, 2025·1 replyThe Darkest Angel
You are in for a big disappointment if you think that's going to happen and even if they found anything that hasn't already been debunked by all those women themselves that isn't going to be enough to prove to any judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a pedophile and therefore NLU is factual. All Drake has to do is show these at the trial and UMG would have no leg to stand on
The real world ain't like twitter. You can't just post s*** out of context to make someone look bad and get a bunch of npc niggas to like it and you win. Lies have serious consequencesNiggas are so stupid, they've let their hate for Drake blind them from common sense.
Goodluck to UMG even trying to insinuate Drake is a pedophile. That'll be what buries them.
The lawsuit states Drake reached out to UMG multiple times and told them of the damage them promoting the song was causing him and they told him to f*** off. He also reached out to them to mediate an agreement or come to some sort of understanding and they told him to f*** off. It also doesn't help their case that they basically told him he'd be ridiculed if he sued them because they're untouchable. Judges don't like bullies.
If he has any sort of proof of his payola and bot allegations, then this s*** is halfway in the bag.
Not to mention, I bet there's lots of other things his lawyers haven't mentioned in the suit that they're saving for the trial.
He hired the damn near best defamation lawyer in the US who has a handful of high-profile wins to his name. Dude and his law firm aren't taking on such a huge case if they don't think there's a path to victory or at least a solid case to be made.
We also don't know the terms of Drake's contract and certain things UMG might have violated by their actions — things strongly insinuated in the lawsuit. It's so many moving parts to this thing that won't be revealed till the trial starts but leave it to KTT2 and Twitter "lawyers" who hate Drake to tell you he doesn't have any chance or any case to make
- Jan 18, 2025thegreatdivine
Niggas are so stupid, they've let their hate for Drake blind them from common sense.
Goodluck to UMG even trying to insinuate Drake is a pedophile. That'll be what buries them.
The lawsuit states Drake reached out to UMG multiple times and told them of the damage them promoting the song was causing him and they told him to f*** off. He also reached out to them to mediate an agreement or come to some sort of understanding and they told him to f*** off. It also doesn't help their case that they basically told him he'd be ridiculed if he sued them because they're untouchable. Judges don't like bullies.
If he has any sort of proof of his payola and bot allegations, then this s*** is halfway in the bag.
Not to mention, I bet there's lots of other things his lawyers haven't mentioned in the suit that they're saving for the trial.
He hired the damn near best defamation lawyer in the US who has a handful of high-profile wins to his name. Dude and his law firm aren't taking on such a huge case if they don't think there's a path to victory or at least a solid case to be made.
We also don't know the terms of Drake's contract and certain things UMG might have violated by their actions — things strongly insinuated in the lawsuit. It's so many moving parts to this thing that won't be revealed till the trial starts but leave it to KTT2 and Twitter "lawyers" who hate Drake to tell you he doesn't have any chance or any case to make
You’ve let your love of Drake blind you from common sense
The fact y’all try to justify weird behavior because you’re in love with a man that doesn’t know you exist is sad
- Jan 18, 2025·4 replies
Dorks still siding with UMG after years of being on KTT crying about labels abusing up and coming struggling artist? Lol
Like when they pretended they fw Meek years ago just to flip on him over some tweets
Jan 18, 2025Troy Ave StanDorks still siding with UMG after years of being on KTT crying about labels abusing up and coming struggling artist? Lol
Like when they pretended they fw Meek years ago just to flip on him over some tweets
i thought ktt was anti capitalist
- Jan 18, 2025mos def
Like a lot of people on this site are sociopaths
- Jan 18, 2025Troy Ave Stan
Dorks still siding with UMG after years of being on KTT crying about labels abusing up and coming struggling artist? Lol
Like when they pretended they fw Meek years ago just to flip on him over some tweets
Fake communist
- Jan 18, 2025·2 replies
ValentineYou know when he did this he said quote:
They persecute you, they persecute Christ
God bless women’s rights?I think it’s God who knows the intentions in Kendrick’s heart behind this message. Do not do this. You woulda been better attacking reincarnated
Christianity is against abortion my man. Thanks for providing my point that Midrick anti-Christian and is going to get punished severely by God soon.
- Jan 18, 2025
Great read.
- Jan 18, 2025Troy Ave Stan
Dorks still siding with UMG after years of being on KTT crying about labels abusing up and coming struggling artist? Lol
Like when they pretended they fw Meek years ago just to flip on him over some tweets
They're legit cheering for UMG lmao. This beef has exposed how widespread mental illness is in the "culture."
Jan 18, 2025·2 repliesHugeKetamineFanlmfao you think victims of grooming saying the grooming was okay removes any criminal responsibility? was it okay that tyga f***ed kylie jenner when she was 15 just because she said she didn't mind?
Drake objectively likes them young, Kendrick never lied, lawsuit has no grounds other than hurt feelings
Youre sad lmao
- Jan 18, 2025Tilia
Youre sad lmao
I'm very happy, I have a rich and fulfilling life :) I hope you are happy too!
- Jan 18, 2025
Drake is sad though according to his lawsuit. pray for him to our almighty god Allah SWT pbuh
Jan 18, 2025·2 repliesTiliaYoure sad lmao
you're the sad one for not putting trolls on Ignore
- Jan 18, 2025Cosmic Warrior
you're the sad one for not putting trolls on Ignore
this is a music discussion website there is no insincerity
- Jan 18, 2025HugeKetamineFan
And people still pretend Drake doesn't belong in jail for life.
- Jan 18, 2025Cosmic Warrior
you're the sad one for not putting trolls on Ignore
Dam
- Jan 18, 2025·1 replyAvalanche
Christianity is against abortion my man. Thanks for providing my point that Midrick anti-Christian and is going to get punished severely by God soon.
saying this is very narrow minded. There is nothing explicitly stated that says Christianity is against abortions, especially when we know today thanks to advances in medicine that abortions could be for a multitude of reasons from financial, to age, to health.To place that blame on the human being who thanks to their fellow humans God given abilities were able to develop cures for these circumstances, is just sad. As a fellow believer, we gotta do better and exit these one ways of thinking
