Objectively, to take said ‘victim’ & disregard what they’ve said to still create a narrative in which they’ve explicitly said is not true is just dumb but that’s fine.

New age nonsense.. you might as well worship Molech. May God have mercy on your soul.

It’s a lot of opinions, but no power to carry it

She is not under age anymore , it does not mattee if the action happened years ago. You can still sue, you know that right? , and she decided NOT TO.

She can take her own decisions, which she did.

Why you going against that?

You clearly dont know how consent works

brother, u cant give retroactive consent LMAO whatever the way the victim feels about the thing years later doesnt change whether they are a victim or not

This post ain’t Christ-like

they are on "its not rape if they liked it" levels of thinking it seems

nobody is making narratives about how the victim felt about it, its about the action drake commited.

Ofc you can LMAO, that's the f***ing point

Yall tryna push a narrative like it was your life , getting offended in her place

Makes no f***in sense, or what you gonna do? Force her to sue?

nobody is gonna pressure a victim to sue other than drake fans
no you cant. Nobody is arguing about how it affected the victim or how she feels about it, that doesnt change what it was and that she was a victim.

if someone gets groomed them saying "i didnt get groomed" doesnt change that the fact they got groomed

Obssed stans are going to force a lady to press charges only to validate their silly argument and win internet points

Lady: Its ok, Im fine with it. It happened years ago and it never affected me.

Stans: NO, YOU ARE WRONG. YOU NEED TO SUE HIM OR IM GOING TO SUE YOU FOR NOT UNDERSTANDING CONSENT, B****!

Thats how yall sound

just told you that no one is tryne pressure her to sue or press charges idk if ur going through a psychotic episode or something

doesnt change the fact of what happened
ur goat is a proven weirdo that is attracted to minors and will publicly engage in romantic activities with them once shown they are a minor no amount of cope will change that

You are totally missing the point.

Nobody is saying what happened was correct, but there is levels to it. Yall acting like we are promoting that behavior, we are against it. The thing is that yall using this as an argument to discredit someone only because of stan wars, not because you actually care about the victims health.

If she said she is fine, if there was no evil intentions behind the mistakes, why the f*** you gonna keep pressing this case?.

Its f***in weird that you are vicariously looking for damages when you dont even know these people irl

You clearly dont know how law, consent or dignity works and its sickening

u understand how stupid this line of thinking
label = bad therefore they are always in the wrong always and anyone trying to harm them therefore is always right i will never critically think ever about the case
drake is not an up and coming strugglign artist and its not like hes suing about his deal or something
hes suing over them promoting a diss track by someone on the same label, and if you dont believe the stuff hes said, its perfectly legitimate to think thats not only a dangerous precedent for hip hop but a b**** move!

i dont say this because of the victim. none of this is about how it affected the victim or her health or anything. what makes you think any of this is about the girl? You weirdos are the only ones making it about the poor victim. its not about law either. your the only guy talking about law or the victim's feelings or anyone's intentions. Im talking about the fact of the matter of what occured and what it says about drake and what that opens him up to.

LMAOOOOO.

You actually admitted you dont care about the victim, do you realize that?

You actually admitted its only about hating Drake and nothing else, you dont care about the facts or the law.

S*** is embarrassing

Naaah, this b**** edited his comment. Motherfuker erased the word "Drake" from his comment.

i do care about facts. the fact of the matter of what happened and what that behaviour was. No, how the victim feels about it doesnt change any of that so its p irrelevant. There are a million reasons why a victim might not recognize that they were one or would downplay it to the public.

Yes this convo has always been about drake no one made it anything else other than you

B****, why would you care more about hating Drake than the victims feelings?

Are you insane? Go back to sleep insensitive a******

Wrong again.

Its not about the law or the victims feelings.

This is all about hating Drake

Because the discussion is about drake as a person and what is fair to label him as lmao i think the best way you can accomodate for the victim's feelings is by leaving her alone to deal with it how she sees fit instead of making HER as a person the center of a convo that isnt rly about her but about the actions of the artist

I had no idea that Drake was going for the anti Semitism as well....

Obviously he aint file the lawsuit in all its accusations himself but that man should be ashamed... only proving Kendrick point

Brother, You dont know Drake as person in real life, why would you care about him like that?

The only important thing is if he is commit a crime, thats the only thing that matters.

Being an a****** is not illegal. Why would you dismiss the law?

"calling drake a weirdo is based on only internet rumours and bullshit my goat would never!"
"drake groped and kissed a 17 year old on stage after she told him she is 17"
"uhh well she said it was ok 10 years later and didnt matter!"
"doesnt change that it happened though"
"wtf! thats so f***ed up u dont care about the victim?"