Jan 15, 2025·1 reply
krishna boundread the actual lawsuit, people are posting funny parts of the case on here but this isn't just him complaining, he's making actual claims in here and people have won in civil court over far more ridiculous business transaction differences. it's not 81 pages of drake b****ing. i'm not saying if he's in the right or wrong for doing it but people are making it seem like he's making frivolous claims and he very much is not throughout the document
The claims he's making are so difficult to prove in Federal court. At best they come to a settlement, but in the end he wouldn't win. He's doing legitimate damage to his career.
Jan 15, 2025krishna boundread the actual lawsuit, people are posting funny parts of the case on here but this isn't just him complaining, he's making actual claims in here and people have won in civil court over far more ridiculous business transaction differences. it's not 81 pages of drake b****ing. i'm not saying if he's in the right or wrong for doing it but people are making it seem like he's making frivolous claims and he very much is not throughout the document
Very curious how the link from euphoria "don't tell a lie bout me and I won't tell the truth bout you" to the claims on NLU resonating with the general public goes over in court if it gets there
Jan 15, 2025·1 replyKr0niicThis s*** so funny man
Is it if it wins him the lawsuit? This all helps his claim.
Jan 15, 2025·1 replykrishna boundthe lawsuit isn't about the claim itself or the beef, one of the opening statements basically says this. the claim is that UMG purposefully handled the song differently knowing what the result would be to force him into a worse contract. i'm not saying this is true or valid, but the claim isn't "someone said something bad about me", it's "UMG used someone saying something bad about me in a leveraged manner". people are focusing too much on the ridiculous stuff in the document but unlike the spotify one there's actual claims in this
Unless UMG had DJs across the country set up to play the song the day it dropped then I find this hard to believe
Why would Universal damage their cash cow only to re-sign them for diminishing returns? If they only want his back catalog then they could buy it out from him via Tech firm
Other than that, Drake’s newer music hasn’t even touched the Top 50 after the beef. So destroying Drake’s reputation just to re-sign him to a worse deal where they’ll probably make less money makes zero sense
- Jan 15, 2025
Drake with his new lawsuit
“the Epstein angle was definitely not the s*** I expected “
Jan 15, 2025i’m crine at how everyone just made s*** up about a settlement in the last thread. KTT lawyer cosplay at its finest
goretex 💁🏽♂️Jan 15, 2025
Silas"On information and belief, Lamar signed a short-term deal with UMG to see if UMG could prove its value to him—to promote him more effectively than any other music company could—in a compressed timeframe.
If successful, Lamar would then continue his relationship with UMG through a new, longer-term contract.
On information and belief, that long-term deal was consummated in December of 2024."
Wait what
Jan 15, 2025Silas"On information and belief, Lamar signed a short-term deal with UMG to see if UMG could prove its value to him—to promote him more effectively than any other music company could—in a compressed timeframe.
If successful, Lamar would then continue his relationship with UMG through a new, longer-term contract.
On information and belief, that long-term deal was consummated in December of 2024."
Interesting
OPJan 15, 2025THERE'S STILL BOT ACCUSATIONS IN THE LAWSUIT
Jan 15, 2025·2 replies
Smacked Voodoo
"Where can I purchase Drake's candles?"
Jan 15, 2025
ElementalOne of the intruders used his bare hands to dig into drakes property on May 8th
Bro was outside the OVO Embassy like this
Jan 15, 2025Lawubrey Graham gotta chill man
Jan 15, 2025
BrickellBaysideNo this is extreme lol
I would agree if he wasnt obsessed with a song that was released almost 9 or 10 months ago
Everyone is past it he has dropped 3 suits about it
Jan 15, 2025·2 repliessizzurpsteveYou’re constantly moving the goal post lol prior to Family Matters s*** was said in songs by both of them
Once again people clearly do not care about domestic abuse and rappers/famous people. I gave you 3 examples and people still champion those people to this day. Can’t believe I have to actually spell this all out for you. Being labeled and PEDO is severe defamation. Way more so than being an alleged “woman beater”
Clearly you seen how it plays out so why still act dumb about the entire thing? You live under a rock?
You do not get to choose which accusation is worse and just disregard the other one.
Defamation is defamation. If Kendrick wanted to sue Drake for the lyrics in Family Matters, he has every right to
- Jan 15, 2025
Notice that little kid got quiet when i asked what his excuse is for being in every drake thread
Jan 15, 2025Unforgivable"Where can I purchase Drake's candles?"
Jan 15, 2025Silas"On information and belief, Lamar signed a short-term deal with UMG to see if UMG could prove its value to him—to promote him more effectively than any other music company could—in a compressed timeframe.
If successful, Lamar would then continue his relationship with UMG through a new, longer-term contract.
On information and belief, that long-term deal was consummated in December of 2024."
Last lawsuit Drake claimed UMG employees were getting fired for showing "loyalty to Drake" lmao.
I wouldn't take anything in this doc as a fact till proven.
- Jan 15, 2025Silas
"On information and belief, Lamar signed a short-term deal with UMG to see if UMG could prove its value to him—to promote him more effectively than any other music company could—in a compressed timeframe.
If successful, Lamar would then continue his relationship with UMG through a new, longer-term contract.
On information and belief, that long-term deal was consummated in December of 2024."
Means absolutely nothing man
- Jan 15, 2025TheFader
You do not get to choose which accusation is worse and just disregard the other one.
Defamation is defamation. If Kendrick wanted to sue Drake for the lyrics in Family Matters, he has every right to
Yeah and none of you would let that slide lmfaoo
Jan 15, 2025PALESTINE DATTENIs it if it wins him the lawsuit? This all helps his claim.
u are an actual b****
Jan 15, 2025MidzyThe suit was brought on behalf of Drake by Michael J. Gottlieb, a partner at the firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, who has previously represented the owner of the Washington pizzeria targeted by the “Pizzagate” conspiracy theorists and the election workers falsely accused by Rudolph W. Giuliani of aiding a false plot to steal the 2020 presidential election.
???????????????????
Jan 15, 2025·1 replyThe social media comments in the suit are hilarious. He go that from the Vogue suit against him, when they used this site.
- Jan 15, 2025·1 reply
Can't believe my goat is doing this man
Jan 15, 2025Havent listened to that s*** in weeks but it might be time to run it back lol
- Jan 15, 2025·1 replyUnforgivable
"Where can I purchase Drake's candles?"
I know you got them. You the biggest drake stan on this site