Everything they're doing is proving him right. They're all ducking and dreading discovery like some dark curse but they still wanna claim innocence lmao.
Nobody wants to go to discovery unless you absolutely have to
As a huge Drake fan, it has been interesting seeing Drake fans who have never talked about a court case in their entire life
All of a sudden be legal experts
Us angels are so talented shoutout OVODocket
When the case is dismissed and all the OVHoes start coping again.
As a huge Drake fan I doubt that happens, it would be terrible for optics
Most likely the public will have no idea how this truly ends but any real OVO solider knows Drake got a least a billy and owns UMG now
As a huge Drake fan I doubt that happens, it would be terrible for optics
Most likely the public will have no idea how this truly ends but any real OVO solider knows Drake got a least a billy and owns UMG now
As a huge Drake fan remember when Drake dropped the petition against UMG and we all gloated for about 12 hours that UMG kissed the ring, Only for him to actually file the lawsuit the next day
As a huge Drake fan remember when Drake dropped the petition against UMG and we all gloated for about 12 hours that UMG kissed the ring, Only for him to actually file the lawsuit the next day
As a huge Drake fan how could I forget
I finally felt happiness, all my favorite accounts told me Drake got a huge settlement, Great Devine, Ak, OVO William
Just for my hopes to crash and burn, but just like Drake, I get back up, just to crash and burn again
No use trying to have any good faith discussions with these people. They are still repeating the same s*** they said 570 pages ago. Very clear what’s going on.
At a certain point you have to let these guys get whatever win they can get lol. They don't even understand the difference between no public response and a completely separate publication talking to an insider lmao. Been a tough year for them
At a certain point you have to let these guys get whatever win they can get lol. They don't even understand the difference between no public response and a completely separate publication talking to an insider lmao. Been a tough year for them
As a huge Drake fan you are talking to a fellow angel brother, we've spent many of night in the drake album thread waiting for the real red button
As a huge Drake fan you are talking to a fellow angel brother, we've spent many of night in the drake album thread waiting for the real red button
Oh s*** lol I thought he was talking about Drake fans lmao my bad
Oh s*** lol I thought he was talking about Drake fans lmao my bad
All you gotta do is look at his name. It’s a Drake reference
Oh s*** lol I thought he was talking about Drake fans lmao my bad
As a huge Drake fan thats how we get ya, we start out sounding logical but then you realize we are only here to protect The Boy
All you gotta do is look at his name. It’s a Drake reference
I wouldn't know
drake is the goat. thank drake for the day. thank drake for saving rappers. thank drake for being raps savior. thank drake for saving the raptors. thank drake for promoting prime energy. thank drake for draining my bank account on stake. thank drake for marvins room.
Why so much focus on Texas? What is going on down there?
iirc they have more laws that are more favorable for drake's type of case typically
Why so much focus on Texas? What is going on down there?
It’s where iHearts headquarters is.
drake is the goat. thank drake for the day. thank drake for saving rappers. thank drake for being raps savior. thank drake for saving the raptors. thank drake for promoting prime energy. thank drake for draining my bank account on stake. thank drake for marvins room.
More importantly, this settlement was reached on February 26.
AP was the first to report on it and Drake's legal team left a statement that echoed what they filed with the court (both parties reached a settlement that was favorable to both parties and as such, the suit would be dropped). That was when iHeartMedia (via their lawyers) were supposed to leave their own comment. Even if they couldn't immediately reply to AP in time for their article, they could have left a comment with them a day or 2 later and the article would have been updated but they didn't.
5 days pass and now a "source from iHeartMedia" puts out a statement that all the publications are rushing to post, instead of the initial post that AP posted. That source still isn't iHeartMedia because their lawyers are supposed to put out that statement, not some random, faceless "source."
These are the same games UMG tried to play when they LIED that Drake had taken out certain elements of his lawsuit against them and that would lead to the case being dropped. A bunch of legacy media publications reported that, which was based on absolutely nothing but what they were fed by UMG because there isn't even any legal document corroborating that.
That's why Drake's lawyers doubled down and insisted the judge not push the start of the trail further. Too many games are being played.
is this your first time reading the news? large stories often break because of individuals within organisations speaking to media prior to the organisation making an official statement. it’s very strange that you think this is unusual
is this your first time reading the news? large stories often break because of individuals within organisations speaking to media prior to the organisation making an official statement. it’s very strange that you think this is unusual
Your comment would have merit if the obvious source wasn't CtG
Your comment would have merit if the obvious source wasn't CtG
Is there a source for CtG being the source? I think that insider is an obvious PR move regardless and I don't give it much merit but would like to know if it's definitely him
as a huge Drake fan, can someone please explain to me why this video makes it seem like Drake is a pedophile? is there a certain part of it that’s misleading? is any of it fake footage? made with AI? taken out of context? please help, i want to keep stanning Drake but need to know that he wasn’t kissing and sexually touching 17 year olds while he was 23