Wtf happen on page 88 . That’s too far

If you can’t say

Certified lover boy certified pedophile on a song than America doesn’t have laws

He about to perform that song at the Super Bowl for known pedophiles

Crazy yall get the lyrics wrong

If i won 2 Golden Globes and 2 Academy Awards while being nominated 10 times for each you’d think I’d be on this site??

Brother

Obviously

drake is the biggest loser on the planet bro

Sue me

Is that against any law? Criminal or civil?

I feel like the entire Not Like Us angle is a bluff to try and scare UMG into caving. I don't think Drake cares about bots man.

I think the 100gigs was that too. The 100gigs was supposed to be a threat.

Ultimately, UMG nor Drake will want this to go to trial for obvious reasons, and they'll come to terms on an out of court settlement and this will disappear.

Open Hinge
“I wanna sniff ur armpits like im f***in huffing glue”
Close hinge go buy an 8 ball

Everyone a lawyer but I don’t see them in the national lawyers guild

Im in both the thieve’s and mage’s guild

Real

say no more

Ja Rule no longer the biggest L in rap and passing it to Drake

Entertainment lawyer Kevin Casini describes Drake's filings as more “whining than anything else,” adding that the case for a lawsuit lacks “meat on the bone.”

• agreed - it's interesting to only complain about these things which have seemingly always existed now it has specifically been used against you. ik people argue well drake was getting these big bucks deals for a reason but still the industry is definitely dodgy with their numbers.

"Another entertainment lawyer, choosing to remain anonymous, suggests the disagreement “gets nowhere near trial” due to the challenges in proving defamation."

• fair enough despite the song clearly being disses about him, the legal challenge of linking the dissses and the alleged stream manipulation to directly harming Drake is not straightforward. Labels are supposed to support their artists songs (especially if they're popular)

Regarding "the streaming bots and the pay-for-play thing," even if he feels strongly that there’s some documentation that can prove this, he doubts it will significantly influence the outcome. “I don’t think the average consumer is going to say, ‘Oh, Kendrick paid for bots. Therefore, Drake actually won.’”

• I think this is super disingenuous to say, so if there is documentation that proves this the filings have some solid ground then what does that mean legally..? obviously he lost the beef, we're talking about the legal implications of an artist vs their label here and people are still worried about the intricacies of a rap beef

Drake stan’s left this thread because they know bro ain’t winning this s*** legally so they have to go talk about sales

what happend

I really thought Anthony Richardson tapping out before a 3rd down play was the softest thing I was going to see all year but Drake had to go full Karen mode