you're arguing this could proceed to something deeper and may get settled
They're arguing they're barely is enough in the lawsuits right now to even entertain Drake's claims nor would it help him in the UMG deal
not saying they're 100% right but yall are on two different pages of how this goes. i think it could be a play for Drake to get out the current deal but don't see how you think this ends with him in a deal worth hundreds of millions more. a lot of dramatic steps would be needed
idk if it's play to leave the deal - i think the docs make it pretty clear that this is to find out more information, up to them if they wanna open themselves up to that right?
@Randy_Butternubs Your vibe is so familiar and comforting
Good for you. I’m an entertainment lawyer myself and explained earlier in this thread why Drake’s firm will have trouble succeeding on the merits of these claims.
Hence the tag for a poster who I gave reasons to before.
what are your thoughts on this claim (as an entertainment lawyer) ?:
"The incentives are largely based on the specific UMG division, rather than the performance of UMG more generally.
For example, the annual incentive or bonus of Interscope’s CEO, John Janick, is based 90 percent on the financial success of Interscope and only 10 percent on the financial success of UMG generally.
Thus, on information and belief, Mr. Janick and other executives at Interscope have been incentivized to maximize the financial success of Interscope through the promotion of “Not Like Us” and its revitalizing impact on the artist’s prior recording catalog, including his first five studio albums, which are owned by Interscope."
I’m a direct decedent of George Washington who wrote the Judiciary Act of 1789 creating The Supreme Court so I guess you could say I’m your boss
Denzel’s burner
notice how none of those weird ovo ktt niggas itt
surprised to see this thread is kinda balanced now - ts is interesting af to talk about
surprised to see this thread is kinda balanced now - ts is interesting af to talk about
i like your avi
reminds me of some baby keem type s***
@sab Why did the beef thread close? Shouldn't it open up again bc all of this stuff?
lol
notice how none of those weird ovo ktt niggas itt
post some more clapdeads and see what happens

Good for you. I’m an entertainment lawyer myself and explained earlier in this thread why Drake’s firm will have trouble succeeding on the merits of these claims.
Hence the tag for a poster who I gave reasons to before.
Yo that’s sick do you like it? The job?
Talk about him likin’ young girls, that’s a gift from me
That’s entrapment
Case closed

what are your thoughts on this claim (as an entertainment lawyer) ?:
"The incentives are largely based on the specific UMG division, rather than the performance of UMG more generally.
For example, the annual incentive or bonus of Interscope’s CEO, John Janick, is based 90 percent on the financial success of Interscope and only 10 percent on the financial success of UMG generally.
Thus, on information and belief, Mr. Janick and other executives at Interscope have been incentivized to maximize the financial success of Interscope through the promotion of “Not Like Us” and its revitalizing impact on the artist’s prior recording catalog, including his first five studio albums, which are owned by Interscope."
This doesn’t seem like anything substantial or unethical
A cease and desist is for hoes
The cease and desist on like that remix was done by Lucian not Drake
Drake music aint even that good for niggas to be acting like this. You would have thought bro made Graduation, LR and MBDTF
The cease and desist on like that remix was done by Lucian not Drake
Still funny he said that and does this